{"id":10022,"date":"2019-01-02T20:53:19","date_gmt":"2019-01-03T00:53:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/?p=10022"},"modified":"2019-01-02T20:54:29","modified_gmt":"2019-01-03T00:54:29","slug":"evil-is-beautiful-in-the-secret-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/2019\/01\/02\/evil-is-beautiful-in-the-secret-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Evil Is Beautiful in &#8220;The Secret History&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/static.bookofthemonth.com\/covers\/list\/SecretHistory.jpg\" alt=\"Image result for the secret history\" width=\"227\" height=\"329\" \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the holiday break, where the days drift like dreams one after another, losing track of time, I find myself reading more than ever. I had the great pleasure of finally finishing Donna Tartt\u2019s brilliant 1992 novel <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Secret History,<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> the same author who recently wrote <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Goldfinch<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> which won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Secret History<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> took me an excruciatingly long time to finish&#8211; it\u2019s a sprawling nearly 600-page novel, dense with detail and suspense. I started it last December, read it for a couple months between classes in the dining hall or before bed until the library due date approached, and I still wasn\u2019t finished (I wonder how many completions of books have been squandered by library due dates). More than half a year later, I wandered into a bookstore and, remembering how much I loved the book, how absolutely beautiful it was, I bought it and finished it. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I marvelled at the author\u2019s capability to create such a beautiful novel&#8211; though it\u2019s strange that I call it beautiful, as the plotline centers around the murder(s) committed by a group of classics students at a small, elite college in Vermont. Most of the group of protagonists are illustriously rich (except for the narrator), lack guiding parental figures, and are drawn to the abstract and the beautiful. They are herded by their professor Julian, who doles out ideas about aesthetics and Greek and philosophy in their class, his students like a tiny cult and him like a benevolent dictator. He presents the idea of a bacchae to his students, essentially a huge party where people get drunk and do various other activities to achieve some sort of transcendent, spiritual experience. His students actually&#8211; not just theoretically&#8211; carry this out, and, in the process, end up unknowingly murdering a farmer. One thing leads to another, and before they know it, they are on a bewitching, mesmerizing path into evil. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The fatal flaws of these characters, I think, is that they fail to draw the line between the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">beautiful<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">good<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Often, the conflation of morality and beauty can lead to disastrous consequences. Things that are irreverent, crude, hurtful, don\u2019t seem so bad because they appeal to our senses or pleasures. The murders these characters commit are done out of a love for beauty&#8211; they yearned for the picturesque, longed to be part of the tragedies and dramas they read about in their Greek class. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Julian, the professor in the book, often said \u201cBeauty is terror.\u201d Donna Tartt, the author, was asked in an interview whether she believed beauty really is terror, to which she responded: \u201cBeauty is harsh&#8211; I mean, there\u2019s almost no respect in which it isn\u2019t harsh. If you\u2019re talking about physical beauty, if you\u2019re talking about the beauty of a flower, or a beautiful person, it\u2019s horrible because it\u2019s given completely capriciously, one has no control over it, you have it or you don\u2019t, really. The same with the flower&#8211; the flower can\u2019t help if it\u2019s a rose or a weed, it\u2019s just born what it is. So there\u2019s cruelty in the way that it\u2019s even doled out. And also, it\u2019s ephemeral, that\u2019s the horrible thing about it. Even to the living things that are lucky enough to be given beauty, it lasts for a very short time.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This, I think, is the fatal flaw that the characters in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Secret History<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> fail to understand. To them, it is beauty that is the eternal thing, not morality&#8211; or perhaps, they mistake beauty as being equivalent to goodness, and fail to recognize that it is so fundamentally unjust, unfeeling, and ephemeral. It\u2019s like what Oscar Wilde once said: \u201cA work of art is useless as a flower is useless. A flower blossoms for its own joy. We gain a moment of joy by looking at it. That is all that is to be said about our relations to flowers.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And perhaps we must have this perspective about beauty and art and goodness. Perhaps this way, we can properly separate a flower from its feeling, fact from fiction, or else we risk the mistake that the characters in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Secret History<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> made, leading them down the inexorable path of evil, steeped so far that they didn\u2019t even know it was wrong. Evil is still evil if it is in a picture frame, if it is on a beautiful face, if it is in Greek tragedy. Evil can be beautiful, but it can never be good. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the holiday break, where the days drift like dreams one after another, losing track of time, I find myself reading more than ever. I had the great pleasure of finally finishing Donna Tartt\u2019s brilliant 1992 novel The Secret History, the same author who recently wrote The Goldfinch which won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize. The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2194,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10022"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2194"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10022"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10022\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10025,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10022\/revisions\/10025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}