{"id":1633,"date":"2011-03-15T23:50:19","date_gmt":"2011-03-16T03:50:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www3.arts.umich.edu\/ink\/?p=1633"},"modified":"2011-03-16T18:44:52","modified_gmt":"2011-03-16T22:44:52","slug":"watching-the-sky","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/2011\/03\/15\/watching-the-sky\/","title":{"rendered":"Watching the Sky"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Clouds are innocuous things to look upon, omnipresent, mundane, worth barely a mention. The sky is there every day and night. Weather often serves as a filler in conversations, a last resort. And yet, many seem to have a propensity for sunsets and sunrises and dramatic summer cumulonimbuses. Never mind cliche. &#8220;Let&#8217;s enjoy nature,&#8221; people say, and head out to the yard or the lake to watch the sunset. There is allure, clearly, but what?<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright\" title=\"v\" src=\"http:\/\/i18.photobucket.com\/albums\/b127\/andunie_\/ink\/13056778.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"180\" height=\"504\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Some time ago, when I had been maintaining a personal blog, I discovered a little link-share page. It was called Skywatch Friday, and the concept was very simple. Every Friday, you blogged. You posted a picture of sky. You added your link to the Skywatch page, and your thumbnail was displayed for all to see. Here&#8217;s the sky in Sweden, the sky in Melbourne, the sky in Iowa. For three years, I browsed others&#8217;, posted my own.<\/p>\n<p>Inane? Perhaps. But what you learned was how to see.<\/p>\n<p>One needs be neither a\u00c2\u00a0meteorologist nor an astronomer to \u00c2\u00a0find interest in studying the sky.<\/p>\n<p>A great number of posts contained the classic something-silhouetted-against-a-sunset shot, or the picture-of-buildings-with-a-sliver-of-sky-in-the-back kind of deal, perhaps. Some displayed particularly striking and unusual atmospheric conditions. One can take a picture for the sake of taking one to post (it boosts my traffic!), or because it seems aesthetically pleasing, or because there is a rare phenomenon that musn&#8217;t be missed. These are simple. Click, done.\u00c2\u00a0But then there are the ones that physically, literally, do not show anything of particular interest. Yet they manage to be more than aesthetically pleasing- meaningful, thought-provoking.<\/p>\n<p>Interpretation is the viewer&#8217;s task.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve recently just read Annie Dillard&#8217;s <em>Seeing<\/em>, an essay on just that. Bah, you think. Everyone sees. We&#8217;re not blind. The truth is objective. It is out there. Is that really the case? In a way, but not quite. We see, she seems to say, what we expect to see. We do not see what we do are not searching for. Those well-versed in their particular areas of knowledge will always see more, know more about their own area than outsiders do.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The point is that I just don&#8217;t know what the lover knows; I just can&#8217;t see the artificial obvious that those in the know construct. The herpetologist asks the native, &#8220;Are there snakes in that ravine?&#8221; &#8220;Nosir.&#8221; And the herpetologist comes home with yessir, three bags full.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Although, what we see is certainly not set in stone. One only has to look. Possess the desire to know, to see, and it will happen. I am not suggesting the sky is full of rich, life-fulfilling truths, necessarily, only that it is a good place to begin. We give such simple things not a second glance, not a second thought. Can it not be that we are missing something?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Clouds are innocuous things to look upon, omnipresent, mundane, worth barely a mention. The sky is there every day and night. Weather often serves as a filler in conversations, a last resort. And yet, many seem to have a propensity for sunsets and sunrises and dramatic summer cumulonimbuses. Never mind cliche. &#8220;Let&#8217;s enjoy nature,&#8221; people [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1633"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1633"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1633\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1643,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1633\/revisions\/1643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}