{"id":7223,"date":"2016-01-25T01:00:07","date_gmt":"2016-01-25T05:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/arts.umich.edu\/ink\/?p=7223"},"modified":"2016-01-24T21:45:24","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T01:45:24","slug":"what-does-it-mean-to-like-a-movie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/2016\/01\/25\/what-does-it-mean-to-like-a-movie\/","title":{"rendered":"What Does It Mean to Like a Movie?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I think consumers of pop culture like me are naturally inclined to love rankings. Top 10 movies of the year! Top 10 summer TV shows! Rankings allow us to discover new things and retrospectively reevaluate art we may have already experienced. Reading movie rankings at the end of the year is one of the irresistible pleasures of being a regular moviegoer and criticism reader.<\/p>\n<p>But they can be a real pain in the ass to create yourself, and that\u2019s due to one problem in particular: it\u2019s so unclear what it means to like a movie.<\/p>\n<p>A year ago, I decided to maintain a list of movie rankings for each year. At the end of 2014, I\u2019d struggled to look at the 57 movies I\u2019d seen and simply rank all of them; it\u2019d be much easier, I figured, to gradually add to the ranking each time I watched a new movie in 2015. And it did start off okay! The first two movies I saw in 2015, \u201cKingsman: The Secret Service\u201d and \u201cThe DUFF,\u201d had an obvious quality gap; I loved the former and thought the latter was okay, so in my preliminary ranking, \u201cKingsman\u201d was #1 and \u201cThe DUFF\u201d was #2.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"thumbnail wp-caption alignnone\" style=\"width: 1010px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.crimsontear.com\/articles\/201503\/kingsman-secret-service-boom-lg.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.crimsontear.com\/articles\/201503\/kingsman-secret-service-boom-lg.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"416\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"caption wp-caption-text\">\u201cKingsman: The Secret Service\u201d has a pretty dramatic climax.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>I found, though, that as the year went on, it became much harder. I ran into the same problem that I ran into in 2014, namely that it\u2019s really hard to determine overall quality. It\u2019s the same reason reducing a movie to a simple grade is so hard. It\u2019s why I\u2019ve come to appreciate websites whose reviews lack star or letter ratings.<\/p>\n<p>What makes you \u201clike\u201d or \u201clove\u201d a movie? I\u2019ve found almost invariably that most of the movies that are regularly considered the \u2018best\u2019 of the year are movies with which I don\u2019t have a huge emotional connection. I was totally engaged throughout \u201cSpotlight,\u201d for example, and there were moments where I was horrified and moments where I felt triumphant. If it does go on to win Best Picture at the Oscars, I\u2019ll be totally onboard, because I know intellectually that it did everything so well.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/s.newsweek.com\/sites\/www.newsweek.com\/files\/2015\/11\/10\/spotlight.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/s.newsweek.com\/sites\/www.newsweek.com\/files\/2015\/11\/10\/spotlight.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1227\" height=\"661\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>But then I watched \u201cSpy,\u201d \u201cTrainwreck,\u201d and \u201cWhat We Do in the Shadows,\u201d three great comedies that made me laugh constantly throughout. Are they all as technically accomplished as \u201cSpotlight?\u201d No, and of course none of them have subject matter as important as \u201cSpotlight.\u201d But if \u201cKingsman: The Secret Service\u201d made me ache with laughter and stunned me with its ridiculously over-the-top, colorful, exhilarating action sequences, is it really that bad that I ranked that above \u201cSpotlight,\u201d \u201cCarol,\u201d \u201cBrooklyn,\u201d \u201cThe Hateful Eight,\u201d and most of the other big Oscar nominees?<\/p>\n<p>This especially becomes a problem when I consider movies that I didn\u2019t really like, but which showed a clear creativity and ambition. \u201cThe Gift,\u201d though very acclaimed, felt shapeless and confusing. In my review, I called it \u201cadmirable in its unconventionality but jarring in ways that negate its intelligent ideas,\u201d and I stand by that. \u201cThe Gift\u201d had an abundance of fascinating ideas that made me want to see more from writer-director Joel Edgerton, especially compared to a clich\u00e9, forgettable movie like \u201cThe DUFF\u201d or even \u201cTrainwreck.\u201d And yet \u201cTrainwreck\u201d was my #11 movie compared to #44 \u201cThe Gift,\u201d and even the predictable \u201cThe DUFF\u201d managed to pass \u201cThe Gift.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/movietvtechgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/amy-schumer-trainwreck-movie-reviews-2015-images.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/movietvtechgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/amy-schumer-trainwreck-movie-reviews-2015-images.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"456\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>So \u2018liking\u2019 something is such an ambiguous term. If you judge quality on originality and innovation, some of your least favorite movies of the year might be some of the best, but if you judge it on the strength of emotional reaction alone, some of your favorite movies might be the worst. I tend to rely on what the movie provokes in me emotionally, so I end up with the suspense of \u201cSicario\u201d and the tear-jerking \u201cBrooklyn\u201d high above the slightly clinical, understated \u201cCarol,\u201d though there was a lot I loved about that movie.<\/p>\n<p>Same goes for \u201cClouds of Sils Maria,\u201d which has a duo of great performances and so many thought-provoking ideas but failed to elicit more than vague interest for me. Having heard about the plot beforehand, I thought the movie would resemble Bergman\u2019s \u201cPersona\u201d or Aronofsky\u2019s \u201cBlack Swan,\u201d two movies that had the emotional punch of psychological horror. Instead, though, it was more patient and exploratory in its themes. It felt like a movie adaptation of a classic work of literature; I\u2019m sure somebody could write a whole book analyzing the movie, but I would\u2019ve traded that for a bit more of an emotional connection.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.christianitytoday.com\/images\/58505.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/www.christianitytoday.com\/images\/58505.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1001\" height=\"583\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I wasn\u2019t wholly uninvolved while watching the movie\u2014I\u2019d still give it a solid B. Aside from the thematic exploration, it was fascinating just to watch Maria (Juliette Binoche) and Valentine (a subtle and great Kristen Stewart) converse. There were some really enjoyable scenes of the two bonding. I especially like the conversation at the bar about superheroes; the silly fantasy movie they were watching was way too on-the-nose and unrealistic, sure, but the conversation has a lot of smart things to say about big-budget fantasy blockbusters versus the high-brow psychologically based theatre that Maria dedicates her life to. I couldn\u2019t help but cheer when Valentine defended teen actress Jo-Ann (Chlo\u00eb Moretz). There\u2019s something nuanced and interesting about the conversation\u2014Maria is clearly a bit condescending in the way she dismisses the teen fantasy genre, and in the way she laughs off Valentine\u2019s defending of Jo-Ann, but it never escalates into an all-out fight, only a healthy debate. You can see how comfortable the characters are with each other, and their unique dynamic kept me intrigued the whole time. Besides, Jo-Ann is an interesting character in her own right, though her subplots don\u2019t quite fit in perfectly with everything else going on.<\/p>\n<p>I guess part of my slight disengagement came from my confusion; though I knew there was so much buried commentary in the movie about identity and art\u2019s relationship with reality, I wasn\u2019t sure what the main conclusion to draw was. The final outcome of Valentine imitating the end of the <em>Maloja Snake<\/em> (the play she\u2019s helping Maria rehearse for) is the logical endpoint for the character based on the theme of life imitating art, but I thought the conclusion would be a bit more tragic and disturbing instead of haunting in an understated way. Then again, maybe the movie\u2019s ideas would be buried in melodrama if it became truly horrifying.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thinkingcinema.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Clouds-of-Sils-Maria-Chloe-Friend.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thinkingcinema.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Clouds-of-Sils-Maria-Chloe-Friend.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"859\" height=\"463\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>All of this is to say that I had no idea where to place \u201cClouds of Sils Maria\u201d on my list. It currently sits at #31, which feels so wrong when you compare it to #27 \u201cUnfriended,\u201d #26 \u201cAnt-Man,\u201d and, again, \u201cKingsman\u201d and \u201cTrainwreck.\u201d And yet each of those movies entertained me more, and elicited more immediate emotions from me. Their ideas aren\u2019t as sophisticated, their writing isn\u2019t as meaningful, and their characters aren\u2019t nearly as complex. But I liked them more.<\/p>\n<p>But what does \u2018like\u2019 even mean, anyway?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think consumers of pop culture like me are naturally inclined to love rankings. Top 10 movies of the year! Top 10 summer TV shows! Rankings allow us to discover new things and retrospectively reevaluate art we may have already experienced. Reading movie rankings at the end of the year is one of the irresistible [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2178,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7223"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2178"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7223"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7223\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7225,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7223\/revisions\/7225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artsatmichigan.umich.edu\/ink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}