REVIEW: Exploring the Complexities of Jazz Funk

Have you ever been to the video studio in the Duderstadt? It’s a super cool space. This was my first time seeing a performance in the studio. They have a lot of fancy sound and video equipment.

Exploring the Complexities of Jazz Funk is a behind-the-scenes commercial dance video production put on by Lenard J. Foust for his masters thesis. Audience members experience what it was like to film a dance video with all the camera angles, breaks between different takes, etc. It was a really unique experience that made me think about the differences between a live dance performance and one that is filmed.

For the most part, I enjoy live dance performances a lot more than filmed ones. This is mainly because I get really annoyed when the camera zooms in and out so I can only see one aspect of the performance. For example, when the camera only focuses on the dancers’ faces, I can not see their footwork. Or when the camera only shows one dancer so I miss out on the synchronicity of the ensemble, which is often a crucial element of the performance. I saw a lot of this happening during Exploring the Complexities of Jazz Funk. They also had busy projections in the background during the videos. I thought it was unnecessary, a little too “busy,” and distracted my focus on the dancers.

Even so, I understand why camera movement and somewhat-psychedelic backgrounds are so widely utilized while filming dance performances. With the shortened attention spans of this generation, it takes more and more to keep audience members intrigued. Camera movement makes a scene more “exciting,” even though I personally believe that choreography should be captivating “enough” in and of itself.

Another element I noticed was how dance should appear “effortless.” Clearly, after dancing vigorously for an hour, most people would be exhausted. But to put on a dance performance that is professional, it is important for dancers not to huff and puff, or grimace, or be dripping with sweat from physical exertion unless the choreography calls for it. Of course there are exceptions. But this is something I have noticed from personal experience and also watching competitions such as World of Dance (an international dance competition and tv show where judges evaluate top dancing talent and troupes of all ages). A dancer’s facial expressions are as important, if not more important, than the choreography. If you are bored by the routine and your movement shows it, how can the audience not feel at least a tinge of boredom or lack of energy as well?

The dancers in Exploring the Complexities of Jazz Funk did a great job of exuding confidence, connecting with the camera, as well as coming up with engaging motion on the spot. Often, I feel like I have a limited repertoire so it was helpful to see how each routine showcased different types of movement. Jazz funk is recognized for its sharp movement and syncopated musicality. It often exudes lots of “femininity,” and the genre combines elements from hip hop, jazz, vogue, and waacking. One piece had a lot of back-arching in its choreography, another featured the fluttering of the hands. Paying attention to the choreography introduced new ideas of movement into my vocabulary.

Overall, the performance was thoughtful. It sparked personal reflection, and I am glad I went.  

PREVIEW: Exploring the Complexities of Jazz Funk

It’s that time of year again when thesis performances are in abundance. Tomorrow and Friday, Lenard J. Foust (Master of Fine Arts in Dance candidate), will present Exploring the Complexities of Jazz Funk.

What is Jazz Funk? It’s more than sharp movements and syncopated musicality. It blends traditional concepts of “masculine” and “feminine” movement. A jazz funk dancer isn’t just someone who embodies the movement, but also one who understands the historical and cultural contexts that led to the birth of jazz funk as a genre.

The thesis performance features twenty dancers, interactive projections, and choreography by Foust, Lando Coffy and Jose Tena (who are international jazz funk dance professionals). Audience members will experience behind-the-scenes production of a commercial dance video.

A panel discussion will follow each 8:30pm performance.

 

Price: Free

Show Times:

March 28th, 7pm and 8:30pm

March 29th, 7pm and 8:30pm

Location: Duderstadt Center Video Studio (Suite 3360), 2281 Bonisteel Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

More info: smtd.umich.edu/dance/#events & https://www.facebook.com/events/217873582492656/

Dancers

REVIEW: Legally Blonde, the musical

Prior to hearing that Musket was putting on the show, I had no idea Legally Blonde was a musical. I knew the story from the 2001 movie starring Reese Witherspoon—which I have really enjoyed in the past. During the show, it was fun to compare the plot and scenes with ones in the movie. I was curious which one came first, so I did a quick search and found out that the movie was produced first. This mak            es the screenwriter’s and director’s artistic choices in the musical even more interesting. Fun fact, Legally Blonde was originally a book by Amanda Brown. The title is a play on the words “legally blind” and “legally bound”—because, you know, Elle is blinded by her binding love for Warner—Ha.  

For the most part, the musical followed the plot of the movie. There were, however, some noteworthy differences. A lot of the scenes were squished or condensed together in the interest of time—such as when Elle and Paulette conversed in the salon and when Vivian invited Elle to the ‘costume’ party.

There were other elements that were unique to the musical as well. Such as Paulette’s fascination with dating an Irish man, which I thought was kind of random. So was the song “There! Right There!” which was about determining if Enrique (the pool boy cross examined in court) was gay or European. Additionally, there was another scene where Elle took the people in the court to a bathroom to present her evidence against Chutney, which was bizarre, outrageous, and almost satirical. Because of these reasons, I thought the musical was much more dramatic and over-the-top than the movie.

I also noticed that Emmett had a much larger role. The storyline focused more on him and Elle falling in love, rather than Elle fighting to get Warner back. There was an entire scene dedicated to Elle taking Emmett shopping and giving him a makeover. In my opinion, it was a weird scene to add, considering that the “makeover” has become a cliche in rom-coms.

Anyway, my most anticipated moment was the bend-and-snap scene. And I wasn’t disappointed. It was infused with humor and amazing choreography. Once Paulette learned how to do the bend-and-snap, a group of boys suddenly appeared and responded to her movement. Their synchronicity with Paulette was delightful to watch. When the scene finally ended, it concluded with a bang: Paulette broke Kyle’s (the UPS guy’s) nose. Kyle fell dramatically and the audience roared with laughter.

Another scene I also really enjoyed was Brooke’s exercise routine/jump-rope choreography. The sequence was so creative. I was blown away by the actors’ athleticism; they basically danced and jump-roped at the same time. I have never seen anything like it.

And of course, I must comment on how much I appreciated having real dogs starring in the show. Reggie the campus corgi appeared, and the audience exploded in cheers and applause which was really funny. Bruiser Woods, the Chihuahua, was also adorable. I awwwed every time he appeared on stage. I was so impressed by how well both dogs behaved. If I was a dog (which is a weird thing to think about), I would have freaked out at the bright lights and loud noises.  

You can checkout behind the scenes videos on Musket’s Facebook page, under “videos.”

REVIEW: GenAPA Cultural Show 2019: “TECHNICOLOR: Vivid past, vibrant future”

This was my first time attending GenAPA’s annual cultural show. There were so many performances that I surprisingly enjoyed and would otherwise not have seen if I had not gone to see TECHNICOLOR. Each performance showcased a unique aspect of Asian and Pacific American culture. A video, played before each group’s performance, described what ‘technicolor’ as well as the Asian and Pacific American community meant to each student group. There were thirteen featured groups and performers in total. Below, I will mention a few of the performances that I particularly enjoyed.

Sinaboro, Korean traditional drumming group, was the opening act. Throughout their whole performance, the musicians remained seated on the floor of the stage. Their joy and passion for samulnori was delightful to observe (samulnori is a genre of percussion music that originated in Korea. The word samul means “four objects”, while nori means “play”. Samulnori is performed with four instruments: a small gong, a larger gong, an hourglass-shaped drum, and barrel drum). The way the musicians played their instruments was almost like a dance, and it was fascinating to watch.

Michigan Hula’s performance was also intriguing. Prior to the show, the only exposure I had to hula dancing was through the movie, Lilo and Stitch (really sad, I know). You know the scene where Lilo went to hula class? Yup, that’s it. I really appreciated hearing, what I believe is, the Ipu (percussion instrument made from gourds that is often used to provide a beat for hula dancing) and the language the dancers chanted and sang during the performance.

Taekwondo put on a skillful, entertaining, and also humorous performance. The taekwondoins began by monotonously demonstrating different kicks and moves. And then the music came on, and the audience went wild. They demonstrated jumping and spinning kicks and fast kicking techniques. They broke wood boards and performed with nunchucks. It was a blast.

DB3 was one of my favorite performances during the show. They are a male k-pop dance crew. During their performance, they danced hip hop as well as k-pop. Seeing their performance made me feel like a judge on the show, World of Dance. The dancers were so in sync and the choreography was refreshing and stunning. I’ll be looking out for their shows in the future.

Overall, TECHNICOLOR was a blast. There was a wide-range of performances which showed different aspects of Asian and Pacific American culture. The show was both educational and entertaining. In terms of the crowd, there was a great turn-out. A lot of people came out to support their friends and also clubs they enjoyed. I am so glad I went this year.

REVIEW: How to Train Your Dragon 3: The Hidden World

 I had mixed feelings about the third movie in the trilogy. On the one hand, there were many elements that I enjoyed. For one, I loved the soundtrack. Two, the animation was amazing. The Hidden World was creatively imagined, and I really enjoyed seeing new species of dragons that hadn’t appeared in the previous two movies.

 

I could also tell that the animators did research on birds and other biological organisms in order to display a diversity of dragon species and behaviors. Toothless’s mating dance was clearly based on mating dances of birds of paradise. Lastly, I thought the themes explored were substantive and intriguing. Hiccup’s coming of age story was heartfelt; he eventually found his sense of self and established self-confidence, even without Toothless. Flashbacks to Hiccup’s childhood were emotional and vulnerable. Toothless and Hiccup’s relationship also demonstrated the important lesson of how love and loss comes hand in hand.

The weaknesses in the film, I thought, were generally in the plot. At times, it was rushed and sloppy: there were unanswered questions in the narrative, levels of threat posed in the story were either exaggerated or understated, illogical choices were made by Hiccup as a leader, and the main villain was unconvincing.

Loose threads/unanswered questions: What happened to the warlords (secondary antagonists) in the story? After Grimmel (primary antagonist) was defeated, the warlords just dropped out of the narrative, which was odd given their massive army, resources, and ambition to conquer the world. The narrative could have been stronger, arguably, if they were taken out of the story completely.

Plot points that don’t make sense: Why would the Vikings of Berk abandon their home without a concrete plan? Yes, Hiccup’s thinking and style of leadership is unconventional, but their village has hundreds(?) of people from an older generation accustomed to combat and warfare. It would make more sense for them to hunker down and fight Grimmel, meanwhile sending out people in search of the Hidden World so they can move there later (once they’re sure the place even exists).

Exaggerated and understated levels of threat: (1)Grimmel had six Deathgrippers, versus the hundreds/thousands of dragons on the island of Berk. Hiccup’s forces significantly outnumbered Grimmel’s forces. Why would the people of Berk feel threatened enough to flee their island they’ve populated for seven generations? (2)Near the end of the movie, Hiccup’s crew attacked a massive fleet of ships in order to save Toothless and the Light Fury. They were outnumbered—possibly 1000:1. However, only two or three ships attacked them and were then easily defeated. There were no cannons fired, no arrows shot, no naval tactics were employed. What??? If only ten or fifteen ships were present in the scene, I would have been less confused and unsatisfied by the enigmatic ease with which Hiccup’s crew defeated the antagonists.  

Regarding the antagonist: I thought Grimmel was an unconvincing villain because he didn’t possess strong intrinsic motivations. Why did he target Night Furies? Why didn’t he want to train Toothless into being his servant instead of killing him? Why didn’t he kill Toothless, given the many chances that he had, if that was his ultimate goal? The movie briefly tried to answer some of these questions during Grimmel’s few monologues and encounters with Hiccup, but I just wasn’t convinced. Perhaps if the movie included a couple of flashbacks from Grimmel’s past, it would have shed more light on his hate of dragons and ambition to hunt Night Furies specifically.

An Aside: Strangely, Astrid felt like a different character in the third movie. I’m not able to pinpoint why, but I think it may be because she had a more masculine role in the first movie (engaging in combat, being jealous of Hiccup, picking a fight with him, being rash(?)), and in the third, she took on a more feminine role (pacifying Hiccup, being the voice of reason, etc). Just the way she talked felt different for me.

Agree or disagree—what are your thoughts on the film?

PREVIEW: GenAPA Cultural Show 2019: “TECHNICOLOR: Vivid past, vibrant future”

Come out for GenAPA’s (Generation Asian/Pacific American) Cultural Show! GenAPA was founded in 1995; they are the biggest Pan-Asian cultural show in the Midwest. Their shows happen every winter semester.

This year’s show celebrates individual talents and experiences through vibrant colors and pictures that symbolize the Asian and Pacific American community. This is a really great example of the intersection of art, social justice, education, and culture. 

A lot of different performance groups will be featured, including:

  • – KPL x PAPhi Step and Stroll
  • – Michigan Taekwondo
  • – K-Motion
  • – Hula Michigan
  • – VeryUs
  • – rXn Traditional
  • – Sinaboro
  • – Seoul Juice x Emily & Jae
  • – DVN Guy-Girl Traditional
  • – DB3
  • – HEADLINER: DAVID SO!!

Tickets: $12 at the door

Location: Lydia Mendelssohn Theater

Date/Time: 3/15/19, 7pm

Connect