REVIEW: God of Carnage

“We are all civilized people, wich means that we are all savages at heart but observing a few amenities of civilized behavior.” -Tennessee Williams

Tonight in Studio 1, the liberal principles of two married couples were torn to shreds before my very eyes in 80 short minutes. Of course, this spectacle was in the guise of a play called God of Carnage by playwright Yasmina Reza, but does that make it any less real? Basement Arts (the source of tonight’s entertainment) is a long-standing student organization, but student organization it nonetheless remains. As such, this means that the quality of the shows they put on is hit-and-miss. “Hit-and-miss” is the nature of all theatre, professional, student, or amateur – but you would be mistaken if you were to suppose that the hits are irreproachable and that the misses are worthless. The directors, performers, and designers for Basement Arts are all students, and this means that, hit or miss, everyone in the room can learn from any kind of performance. In a sense, this is educational theatre – as educational for the actors as for the audience.

Let me first make myself plain: tonight was a success. I have been to nearly every Basement Arts production in the last year, and I must confess myself far more impressed than usual. The scenery was suggestive without being minimalist or reductionist, and I didn’t hesitate to suspend my disbelief. The props were especially clever (particularly the pillow – but I’m getting ahead of myself; we’ll come to that). The momentum of the play was airtight; kudos to director Austin M. Andres on that score. The small cast of four actors had a tough job – Reza’s work is difficult to execute effectively – but I think on the whole it was done right, and done right, the play is monstrously funny and appallingly delicious.

The setting of the play is the living room of Michael and Veronica Valone (Josh Aber and Zoe Kanters). They have invited Alan and Annette Reille (Nick Skardarasy and Emma Sohlberg) over to discuss an incident involving the couples’ sons, who were involved in a physical altercation at a public park. Rather, the Valones’ son was struck in the face by a branch wielded by the Reilles’ son, and the two couples attempt to make some kind of an understanding about it. For a minute or so, all seems civilized – if strained – but soon the pretense gives way to unbounded cruelty. It’s almost like Lord of the Flies, only the people are adults and the “island” is a living room.

Each actor tonight surprised me in various ways, but Skardarasy as the viciously intelligent Alan deserves mention as the stand-out performance of the night. Not once did I doubt the reality of his being. He embodied people I know, people I get along with famously, people I hate – all in the span of eighty minutes. His deadpan comic timing was right on – it was Alan’s deadly seriousness that made him funny, his dry and witty sense of humor that made him loathsome. Certainly God of Carnage was very well cast by a director who knew precisely what he wanted: clear archetypes. Emma Sohlberg was instantly recognizable as the almost Gothically prim wife of harried Alan, presumably a law advisor for a pharmaceutical company currently under scrutiny. His constant incoming phone calls were something of a joke throughout the play. Kanters as Veronica made a convincing self-righteous (and selfish) bleeding-heart liberal, while Josh Aber had a respectable run as her affable, simple, husband.

The genius of this kind of play (and its translator – let’s give credit here where it’s due – Christopher Hampton translated admirably this masterwork from the original French) is that, similarly to Chekhov’s best plays, no one character is the hero or heroine, yet no one is the villain. Still, this isn’t realism. Each character represents all of us, in a way – not entirely a victim, not entirely culpable; but at the end of the day, there is a mixture of pity and hatred for these characters. This is the only way that a play such as this can be successful.

A moment should now be taken to appreciate a part of the play that was so convincing it was almost alarming. Annette, after eating some of Veronica’s cooking, becomes ill, and yes, vomits onstage. Moments like this are so easy to glaze over, to half-ass, or to present apologetically because the director could not find a way to present it without looking foolish and phony. Not so in this case. I am told the vomit was very cleverly concealed inside a pillow that Annette held moments before she “puked.” It actually looked so real that it took a few minutes for me to decide fully that it had indeed been staged, since the characters were moving on with the play and not pausing to inform us that Ms. Sohlberg was truly ill. A very loud hand for this brilliantly conceived moment.

Of course, there were bits that annoyed me somewhat. A couple of times, I felt that the director was reaching for comedy by trying to force a laugh out of a moment that didn’t really warrant one – instead of playing the truth of the characters’ emotions and letting the audience decide when to laugh. This is certainly when the play was weakest. Happily, I can report that these moments were few and overall not corrosive to the rest of the play. Indeed, the truth of moments is what is memorable (Alan stonily quips, “Our son is a savage,” without a hint of bitterness or irony – it’s hilarious); the moments that tried to produce comedy rather than truth were forgettable. Cheaply manufactured “comic” moments rob themselves of humor and rarely make us laugh – one of the great paradoxes of the theatre.

All that aside, though, I enjoyed myself very thoroughly; something of that savage nature displayed in the four characters is awakened in the spectator, who gruesomely revels in the way the couples tear each other to shreds. It’s delightful. One of the greatest structural elements in the play is the way that the characters form and dissolve alliances with the speed of a bullet. Husband and wife wrestle with husband and wife; the next moment, it’s men versus women; at some times, it’s three-on-one. It is probably the most disconcerting and truthful element of the playwright’s storytelling: these are things that we all do. Consciously or not (probably not), we truly are savages competing under the laws of the “God of Carnage” invoked by Alan towards the end.

This is a play where each person starts out with noble intentions, and then for one reason or another, abandons them for the laws of the jungle. It’s important to note that all four people “lose” something important to them: Alan’s phone, his precarious link to his high-stakes job, is drowned in the flower pot by his own wife (she’s made bold by her drunkenness at this point); Veronica’s book is ruined by Annette’s vomit; Michael’s excellent rum is all drunk (again, mostly by Annette), and moreover, his secret phobia of rodents is made humiliatingly public; and by the end, Annette has lost her dignity, reduced to a sobbing wreck (“It’s the worst day of my life, as well”).

If tonight’s show is anything to reckon by, this will be a good year for Basement Arts. Let’s keep these hits coming.

PREVIEW: God of Carnage

It seems that my tastes of late have been very French. First I reviewed Ionesco’s Rhinocéros, and now I’m tackling Yasmina Reza, another French writer. His play God of Carnage depicts an evening involving two children’s respective parents. The action is centered around a playground scuffle between the children in a public park; the pairs of parents meet to discuss the incident in a civilized fashion. Yet as the play progresses, the parents behave more and more childishly and soon we see just how quickly their pretense of civility falls away to reveal the chaos within. I’ve been told the play is uproariously funny. Best yet, and like all Basement shows, it’s free!

What: God of Carnage

Where: Walgreen Drama Center, Studio 1

When: 7:00, tonight, October 27

For more information, visit www.basementarts.org/

I would like to note that in my experience with Basement Arts, the audience isn’t as varied as it could (and should) be. I see mostly people from the theatre or musical theatre program there to support their friends, a few parents, and even fewer strangers. Basement Arts has provided free theatre to the University and its students for nearly a quarter of a century; I urge anyone who can attend this play, or future productions, to do so. Theatre is a vital part of the cultivated life, and what’s more, it’s great fun and an opportunity to get out and meet people!

REVIEW: Oh, a rhinoceros! From apathy to rebellion.

It’s always difficult to leave a play with a full sense of what you thought about it. The problem is compounded when you are met with an absurdist play, particularly when it is a monolith like Rhinocéros, filled with layers of meaning, humor, and pathos. This production, courtesy of the Théâtre de la Ville, left me with very conflicting, and yes, absurd, thoughts.

For those unfamiliar, the plot (such as it is) is thus: in a small French town (though admittedly the setting is never named), Bérenger and his friend Jean meet for a drink, when a rhinoceros passes by, running in a full-tilt rampage. The appearance of the rhinoceros is cause for much discussion and argument among Bérenger, Jean, and the other witnesses (each a kind of cartoon of a character). The argument leads to a near fistfight between the two friends, and no one seems to know anything more about the rhinoceros – even after a second one appears (or is it the same one?).

In the next scene, Bérenger returns to his 9-to-5 job at a law office. Everyone is reading newspapers, and discussion of the rhinoceros(es?) is still at the forefront. Some claim they did not exist, others swear to seeing them; but though nothing more is really accomplished, and Bérenger himself, so uninterested at the first sighting, now tries to prove that the rhinoceros was real. Questions, twisting of words, and belligerent challenges cause Bérenger to question not only whether he had even seen a rhinoceros, but the very nature of evidence. The world around him increasingly represents the question, “How can we know anything? Can we trust our senses?”; Bérenger increasingly finds that the answer is “Yes!” The ability to trust one’s own senses is vital if one is to keep one’s sanity, and the first freedom is the freedom to tell the truth as it is.

Meanwhile, the frenzy about the rhinoceroses begins to terrify Bérenger more and more. There is a moment which should have been comical, but which truly struck me dumb: in the office scene, as a rhinoceros rampages outside, everyone loses their head simultaneously and begins hopping about like wild chimpanzees. A moment later, they return to themselves, but the betrayal is irreversible; we’ve all seen the beasts inside the suits. When terror strikes, reason is the first to leave the party.

Everyone around Bérenger “turns” – even Jean, the last person he expected to – leaving him completely alone. Apathetic at first, Bérenger is forced first to confront the reality of the rhinoceroses around him, and then to take a stance. He is unable to join them, even though for a moment he desperately wants to. He is left no choice but to resist them – completely alone – and it is here that the play ends – with Bérenger’s inspiring and terrifying declaration: “I’m not capitulating!”

Ionesco’s play, while originally an allegory for the rise of the Nazis, is a chilling reminder of that most inescapable part of human nature: humans will always pay attention to disruptive things, even if they are also destructive. The temptation to join in the destruction is irresistible for most (think mob psychology). What is terrifying is that each person’s reasons for turning into a rhinoceros (or, joining the Nazis) were, on the surface, perfectly reasonable: loyalty to one’s husband, loyalty to one’s colleagues, “keeping up with the times,” etc. Only with hindsight does one feel the horror of how easy it is to convert.

This production, located at the Power Center, was very impressive in several ways. First, the ensemble deserves quite a hearty round of applause for their synchronization. Actors are illusionists, and having played Jean once in a production of Rhinocéros, I can confirm that the illusion of a rampaging rhinoceros in the town square is one of the trickiest scenes to stage I know of. Certainly this show was visually striking – I couldn’t help noticing that everyone looked miserable in their stuffy suits. Bérenger, though unkempt, anxious, and bewildered, seemed the sanest and freest person in the play.

The last thing I wish to remark upon is the use of actual rhinoceros head puppets, each so large that they cover more than half of the actor holding them up, and all exquisitely realistic. Held up at various levels and behind a scrim, swaying ominously, and lit so that only the head of the whole “rhinoceros” was visible, each rhinoceros seemed terrifyingly real, ready to charge out of the darkness. Moments such as that made me understand viscerally the anxiety that Bérenger suffers.

The absurd makes us laugh, but it is also a harbinger of horror; in reason we find security, but in Rhinocéros, neither reason nor the absurd offers us any hope. There is only fear; there is only confusion; there is only destruction.

It is truly a pity that Rhinocéros played for only three nights at the Power Center; I would have loved to see it once more, to wrap my head around it a little more. In the meantime, I would suggest that theaters around the country produce more plays from this unconventional yet powerful genre. Absurdism is startlingly underrepresented, and it has so much to offer, even if it doesn’t leave us with that “feel-good” sense of closure when the curtain falls.

So hats off to the Théâtre de la Ville, and to UMS for bringing them to Ann Arbor. And the next time you see a “rhinoceros,” reflect: is apathy an option?

PREVIEW: Théâtre de la Ville: Ionesco’s Rhinocéros

How many plays can you think of where the action involves a struggle for identity? A fair few, I would imagine. How many that involve a struggle to maintain identity in a world where everyone around you is turning into rhinoceroses? Just one: Rhinocéros by absurdist playwright Eugene Ionesco. At once a tragedy and a rollicking comedy, Rhinocéros shows us the journey of one man’s transformation from an apathetic man with nothing to live for to a man who sees with startling clarity what it is he must do: resist the tyranny of the majority. A parable about fascism and France’s involvement with it, Rhinocéros is a play rich with both Ionesco’s brilliant sense of the stage and his facility with words.

What: Rhinocéros by Eugene Ionesco

Where: Power Center

When: Tonight – Saturday, October 13 7:30 PM

Note: The performance will be in the original French with English supertitles.

Rhino is watching.