Tag: Film

REVIEW: Disney’s Snow White

Sappy Leave a comment

In this 2025 live adaptation of Disney’s 1937 film Snow White, Rachel Zegler plays the part of Princess Snow White, a young woman who is mistreated by her evil stepmother, known as the Evil Queen. The Evil Queen is jealous of Snow White for her beauty and kind heart, and thus sends her outside the castle to be killed. However, Snow White escapes and goes on an adventure in which she meets seven dwarves and a group of thieves led by a young man named Jonathan, and eventually confronts the Queen herself.

One aspect that I admired about this film was Rachel Zegler’s musical performance. The emotion she puts into performing is captivating, as one can clearly tell she puts her heart and soul into singing to really bring Snow White’s character to life. Gal Gadot also does a good job portraying the evil queen. Her subtle facial expressions and movements really convince the audience of the queen’s evil nature.

Although this film had many endearing parts such as the cute forest animals that Snow White befriends and the characteristic catchy Disney songs, there were some aspects of the film that I thought were lacking. The overall pacing of the movie felt very inconsistent. Some scenes were drawn out and felt almost boring, while others felt choppy and rushed. There were some key moments that felt a lack of buildup in emotional intensity, leading to abrupt scene changes. However, this could be due to the director wanting to market the movie towards more younger audiences, and so they may have decided to cut out any scenes that would be too intense. I enjoyed how there were a couple instances in which the Seven Dwarves made jokes more catered to adults but were innocent enough that it could be included in a children’s movie.

I also noticed that the costumes on both Snow White and the Evil Queen were noticeably tacky and looked out of place from the film. They looked similar to the Halloween Costumes found in retail stores for children to wear. However, I realize that this is not that important to the overall plot of the film, and is just something that I noticed.

The film kept to the original in some parts but strayed from the original in others. For example, the seven dwarves and their iconic personalities were kept in, as well as the Evil Queen’s magic mirror and poison apple. However, they added the young thief Jonathan and his group of bandits as a replacement for Prince Charming. I thought that made a lot of sense to do because in the original, Prince Charming does not have much of a role in the film.

Although Snow White (2025) was not a tear-jerking, awe-inspiring film, it also was not terrible. The two main actresses did a phenomenal job and the movie still kept its feeling of having Disney magic. However, the film lacked a more deep and thoughtful plot and had an inconsistent flow to it, and so would likely be more enjoyed by young children and their families for a light-hearted movie night.



REVIEW: The Wild Robot

Sappy Leave a comment

Directed by Chris Sanders (best known for How to Train Your Dragon), The Wild Robot stands out for its gorgeous animation, rich worldbuilding, and a touching yet humorous storyline. It’s no surprise that Forbes ranked The Wild Robot among the top 10 best-reviewed computer-animated films of all time. While it isn’t packed with action or major plot twists, its heartfelt, compelling narrative draws the audience deeply into its world.

The Wild Robot is an animated adaptation of Peter Brown’s novel. The story takes place on an island untouched by human life, yet thriving with animals and lush vegetation. The protagonist, Roz, is a service robot who crash-lands on the island after a shipwreck. Though the island’s animal inhabitants fear her, Roz’s programming makes her endlessly kind and selfless. Soon, Roz discovers and cares for an orphaned gosling, which marks the beginning of her emotional development that sheds her of her robotic nature.

I was surprised that this film was only 1 hour and 42 minutes long because the pacing felt natural and never rushed. That said, I personally found the opening a bit jarring. The film begins in a violently chaotic, almost overwhelming way that makes it hard to settle into the story right away. In retrospect, I understand why the filmmakers chose this approach—it fully showcases Roz’s sudden and disoriented arrival—but at the same time, it felt slightly off-putting. Thankfully, once the film found its rhythm, I became fully immersed. I grew incredibly attached to the characters and was deeply moved by their evolving relationships. In the latter half, I even found myself tearing up several times.

My favorite voice performance came from Pedro Pascal, who voiced Fink the fox. I was surprised to learn this was his first animated voice role—he sounded incredibly natural and perfectly captured the sly, sarcastic charm often associated with foxes. In fact, his portrayal reminded me of Nick Wilde, the clever trickster fox from Zootopia. Meanwhile, Kit Connor gave Brightbill, the gosling, a wonderfully youthful charm that embodied the innocence and curiosity of a child. Lupita Nyong’o’s performance as Roz became particularly powerful toward the end. As Roz’s emotional intelligence deepened, so did the rich texture of Nyong’o’s voice, further strengthening the robot’s compelling emotional arc. 

Overall, I would give The Wild Robot a solid 9/10. The only reason it doesn’t earn a perfect score is the rocky beginning, which personally made it a bit difficult to get into at first. Still, this is a touching and worthwhile film. It’s perfect for anyone looking to unwind from the stresses of daily life and enjoy a story rooted in nature, empathy, and personal growth.While its emotional depth resonates with adults, its clear storytelling and themes of kindness make it equally appealing for children.

REVIEW: The Dark Knight

Sappy Leave a comment

Director Christopher Nolan truly outdid himself with his gripping film, “The Dark Knight.” This action-packed movie takes place in Gotham City, where despite the system of law and order, various mobs are running the city and causing havoc. Batman helps to keep crime at bay with the help of Gotham City Police Department’s Lieutenant Jim Gordon and District Attorney Harvey Dent. However, things take a turn when the Joker disrupts the crime scene, causing chaos for both the law-abiding citizens and the criminals of Gotham City. 

I really enjoyed this movie as it was not the typical hero vs. villain action movie that is so common in the movie industry, in which the characters are all either good or bad. Instead, this movie dives deep into the complex emotions of humans and how many will make ‘unethical’ choices depending on what is at stake for them. When successful and morally righteous characters who have always followed the rules have to deal with a traumatic loss, they may end up making cruel choices, but to them these choices are what is ‘fair’. The movie is riddled with scenes in which characters must make a choice, but both choices are cruel and cause suffering to someone/some people, causing the person making these decisions to really think about which choice is the most morally correct. This movie makes you think hard about what is really considered ‘fair’ when making difficult decisions, how nothing is completely black or white.

I thought that the character of the Joker was very well developed, as the Joker is portrayed as different from the usual criminals of Gotham City that are in it for the money. Heath Ledger did an amazing job portraying the Joker as someone that was truly misunderstood by society, causing him to rebel against people that are rule followers. His facial expressions and abrupt mood changes portray a disturbing depiction of an antagonist misunderstood and mistreated by mainstream society. The Joker tries to convince characters that are seen as ‘good’ that they are actually similar to him, and he is constantly trying to push people over the edge to going against the rules and following chaos instead, arguing that ‘chaos is fair.’ 

Aaron Eckhard, who played Harvey Dent, did a marvelous job portraying his character who went through one of the harshest changes I’ve seen throughout the movie (both physically and mentally), and it was interesting to see how he developed as a character. Christian Bale, who played Batman, also captures the essence of how a superhero fits into the rules of society, and whether that makes them a true hero or a vigilante.

Overall, this emotional rollercoaster of a movie with its several twists and turns, paired with intense action shots and thrilling fight scenes kept me gripping my seat in anticipation throughout its entirety. The actors did an amazing job bringing to life the characters that many know from its comics, which really helped to make the viewer feel like they were a part of the adventure. I feel as though this film would be enjoyed by both long time DC comic fans as well as anyone looking for a thrilling action movie with iconic characters.



REVIEW: Mickey 17

Madi Hammond Leave a comment

Science fiction meets satire in an explosive way in “Mickey 17” — but there is simultaneously too much and not enough of either.

Set in 2054, main character Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattinson, “The Batman”) signs up to be an Expendable on the newest space colony expedition to Niflheim after receiving death threats from a loan shark following a failed macaron business venture with his best friend, Timo (Steven Yuen, “Beef”). However, he soon realizes that not reading the paperwork thoroughly was a mistake. As an Expendable, Mickey is sent to do the most dangerous jobs and used as a human guinea pig for the research team onboard. Every time he dies, his memory is simply reuploaded into a newly reprinted version of his body. Meanwhile, failed politician Kenneth Marshall (Mark Ruffalo, “The Avengers”) commands the future colony full of his red-hat-wearing fans with a camera crew in tow, undeserved bravado, and promises of one day reproducing to make a “pure race.”

Once they reach the famed planet, however, native creatures they name “creepers” become a barrier to breaking ground. During an exploratory mission, Mickey miraculously survives a terrible fall. But by the time he makes it back to the ship, another Mickey has already been reprinted; and with “multiples” strictly forbidden under penalty of death, the angrier Mickey 18 and a milder Mickey 17 must keep their existence under wraps.

“Mickey 17” is director Bong Joon Ho’s most recent project after his award-winning film “Parasite.” Bong’s newest film is an amalgamation of genres: satire, horror, science fiction, and comedy, with a few touchingly romantic moments. From start to finish, the film is defined by absurdism. Mickey’s failed business, which was based around misunderstanding that “macarons are the new hamburgers,” sets the tone for a protagonist who has stumbled into something far beyond his understanding.

Ruffalo’s character, while officially inspired by an amalgamation of different tyrannical rulers, reads (at least to the audience at the showing I attended) as a parody of Donald Trump. His reality show-style governance, blonde wife, and red-hat-wearing followers make the connection undeniable. While this satire is amusing at first, its relentless intensity becomes exhausting over the two-hour runtime, growing more repetitive than revelatory.

Pattinson, on the other hand, carries the film with an engaging performance that oscillates between bewildered desperation and deadpan humor. His portrayal of both Mickey 17 and Mickey 18 gives each iteration of his character a distinct edge, subtly differentiating their personalities with their motivations, mannerisms, and even accents. However, the film never quite allows him to fully explore the psychological implications of multiplicity, treating the idea of splitting consciousness as more of a plot device than a deep thematic concern.

Despite its many strengths, “Mickey 17” ultimately feels unfocused. Is it a commentary on environmental protectionism? A philosophical exploration into the implications of dividing consciousness? Or an elaborate vessel for scathing critique of right-wing politics? It might be all of these things, but none stand out as the film’s central thesis.

The concept of the Expendables had the potential to be something profound, but instead, the film brushes past it in a brief flashback explanation about why reprinting technology is only allowed on Earth. This missed opportunity leaves “Mickey 17” feeling like a film bursting with ideas yet unwilling to fully commit to any of them. While entertaining, it leaves the audience wondering: What was the ultimate point?

REVIEW: Mufasa: The Lion King

Sappy Leave a comment

Despite the many negative reviews surrounding the musical drama film Mufasa: The Lion King, I actually really enjoyed it. The storyline acts as both a prequel and a sequel to the original animated The Lion King. While it’s not life-changing or particularly essential, it’s a fun film that adds to the world-building of the original in an endearing way. Perhaps it’s because I had low expectations and didn’t know exactly what to expect, but I found the online reviews overly harsh for a movie primarily directed toward children.

The plot begins with the lion cub Kiara, Simba’s daughter, who is frightened by a large thunderstorm. She doubts her capabilities and expresses that she could never be brave like her grandfather, Mufasa. In response, Rafiki, an elderly and wise mandrill, tells her a story to encourage her. He recounts how Mufasa was at her age and how he grew up to become the great king we saw in The Lion King. Mufasa, who we originally see as proud, confident, and courageous, is depicted as more vulnerable and dispirited in his youth. He struggles to believe in himself or accept praise, which seems hard to believe given his personality in his adult form. Through the animals Mufasa encounters on his journey, the film explores themes of family, belonging, and love. His journey proves his worthiness as king and highlights the qualities that make him a true leader. The plot is a coming-of-age story, fitting for its intended audience. This aspect resonated with me, and I believe many children would connect with it too.

The narration is engaging, with the story progressing at a good pace. However, while Mufasa’s character development is well-paced, the development of other characters either lacks depth or, particularly toward the end, feels rushed. As the movie reaches its climax, the character arcs become hurried, especially in the conclusion, which makes their actions seem almost out of character. One factor that held the character development back was the CGI animation. While the visuals were strikingly realistic and beautiful, the realism made it harder for characters to express themselves facially or display more creative body language. It also became difficult to differentiate the lions, as they generally shared the same appearance aside from slight changes and their voices. While these details may stick out more to adults, younger children may not notice them as much, meaning a cartoon version might have appealed to a wider audience.

This placed a greater emphasis on the voice acting and music, which I think the film did well. The instrumental soundtrack was a great homage to the original, with many elements inspired by or directly recreated from it. I also appreciated that there was often music playing in the background. In addition to the bright sunshine and natural scenery, this contributed to the triumphant and joyful emotions in the film. However, one disappointing aspect was the singing, which I felt could have been of higher quality, as it could have been another opportunity to express the character’s personality. 

I think the film’s weaknesses largely stem from the characters not feeling as relatable. However, most of the movie’s strengths lie in its overarching messages and foreshadowing of events that occur in the original. I think it would be a great film for young children to understand self-growth, confidence, and friendship. Though it may be an unpopular opinion, I don’t think it is a waste of time or detracts from the original The Lion King in any way, unlike other prequels and sequels I’ve seen. I would still recommend it to people of all ages, but it’s important to approach it with an open mind. 

REVIEW: Wicked

Sappy Leave a comment

After several disappointing movie-musical adaptations in recent years, I was skeptical that Wicked would be any different. As the first musical I had ever seen, and on Broadway in New York no less, I had especially high expectations. However, I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the hype surrounding the movie was justified. Under the guidance of director Jon M. Chu, with a talented main cast including Ariana Grande (Glinda), Cynthia Erivo (Elphaba), and Jonathan Bailey (Fiyero), Wicked offered a refreshing take with a charm that still retained the essence of the Broadway play that sparked my love for musical theatre.

Based on Gregory Maguire’s novel Wicked, the story is a prequel to The Wizard of Oz. The main character, Elphaba, grows up experiencing hardships due to her unusual green skin. Ostracized by even her own family, she is nonetheless loved by her nanny. Because of this, she grows up with a pure heart. When she sends her younger sister to Shiz University, Elphaba catches the eye of Madame Morrible, played by Michelle Yeoh. Morrible is a famous magical history professor and the object of admiration for Glinda, a beautiful and popular girl who has lived a life essentially the opposite of Elphaba’s. As the story progresses, it explores the complex relationship between the two women. Their character development is one of the highlights of the story, touching on themes of friendship, values, purpose, and societal expectations. Grande and Erivo’s chemistry, both on and off screen, brought this relationship to life brilliantly. 

Despite both the musical and the movie running for roughly three hours, the movie only covers half of the original story. I did feel that the pacing dragged at times, with the plot progressing slowly—almost frustratingly so. However, this slower pace gave more creative freedom to the director and actors. Compared to the stage production, Elphaba and Glinda felt more alive in this version. Their characters were more developed and complex, which created a deeper connection with the audience. I particularly enjoyed Glinda’s nuanced portrayal, whereas in the play, she seemed more ditzy and one-dimensional.

Though I find live singing and dancing more impactful, the movie was still incredibly immersive. The film’s close-up shots of the characters, their costumes, and facial expressions added a level of intimacy that the stage production can’t match. The lighting and camera angles also contributed to a richer atmosphere. The movie was visually striking and the vivid colors truly brought the fantasy world of Oz to life. These added details allowed for more foreshadowing, extensive world-building, and deeper character development. It never felt like a simple recording of the play. 

A friend of mine, who is more versed in musical theatre techniques, also offered some insightful commentary on how film is a unique medium. On stage, only those sitting in the front row get to see the actors’ faces clearly, and even then, it’s impossible to catch all the small details. It’s difficult to compare movies and theatre because they offer different experiences and strengths. Perhaps that’s why I remain skeptical about many movie-musical adaptations retaining a high quality—they’re often unfairly compared to the original. Nevertheless, Wicked is proof that a great musical-movie adaptation is possible.