PREVIEW: RC Player’s Marie Antoinette

While delving into the world of American playwright David Ajmi’s Marie Antoinette, it is evident this revisionist history comes from the growing oeuvre of theater-meets-pop-culture. Labeled a “tragicomic satire”, it turns its French Revolution-era subject into a mirror for today’s political climate. Put on by the RC Players, I am interested to see how they will take Ajmi’s work and run with it, not only with the script, but with any potential set and costumes (though that’s possibly due to the cotton-candy spectrum of the Sofia Coppola film coming to mind). With the potential to invigorate (or infect, depending on your historical tastes) the continually-analyzed figure of Marie Antoinette with the self-absorbed pop culture of today, I’m excited to see how vain and indulgent their Marie can become to create the biting satire that humbly reminds us we haven’t distanced ourselves too much from the past two-hundred-fifty years.

March 17 & 18, 8pm

Keene Theater, East Quad

Free

Image c/o the American Repertory Theater’s 2012 production of Marie Antoinette

REVIEW: A Dangerous Experiment

A Dangerous Experiment, apart of U-M’s Bicentennial Semester, follows the college careers of the fictional first class of women at Michigan, beginning in 1871 and concluding in 1875. It tells of their trials, triumphs, and the different paths they choose to take. All the women choose a varying way, emphasizing the factions within one movement. Imbued with school spirit, it took a different form than the usual maize and blue rally cry, acknowledging both the strengths and pitfalls of the University’s history.

As I waited in line for the doors of the Keene Theater to open, I looked around and realized the awaiting audience – including myself – was 95% female. While it was not entirely unexpected, being a play about women, it always strikes me that this seems to be the theme in contemporary culture: if the plot is composed of women, it is likely the audience will too.

Emma McGlashen, a U-M student as well as the writer and director, proved to write a script that featured the female-empowering speeches I want to wake up to and drink my coffee over, steeping myself in the fierce words of other women. The play opened to a stage full of men, unintelligibly rumbling about the future of women – not so different than what our country looks like today. As I talked with my friends over intermission, we had to keep reminding ourselves that this was taking place 150 years ago, but also only 150 years ago. It sometimes seems as though the extent of our progress surpasses the decade and half timeline, yet the dialogue was simultaneously present and poignant. One of the points emphasized in the play was that these women, fighting for the right to study alongside men at the University of Michigan, were not only fighting for themselves, but for the women who would come after them. The play’s sharp and timely dialogue hit the center of an ongoing injustice against women; the statements were composed of a century-plus discussion without being trite.

Walking out of the theater, I realized that almost three hours had passed, and yet it felt as though we had just begun to hear this history. I suppose I’m just a sucker for any story about women supporting women. Within the main female characters, I saw the same fears and determination of female students I know today. This play only reaffirmed my love for portraying a female-studded history within the arts.

While it confirmed that I have no wish to return to the roots of Michigan, where women are subject to wearing corsets and attending class behind a curtain, I discovered a nostalgia for one aspect of the past: petitioning every male on campus to return to wearing suits and ascots to class. This, though, is a one-sided street; I will continue to wear pants.

If you get the chance, I could not recommend going to see this show more. If you’ve missed both Friday and Saturday nights’ showings, there is one more performance on Sunday afternoon!

PREVIEW: A Dangerous Experiment

This play takes us back to 1871, to U-M’s first class of female students to enter into the exclusively-male student body. Written and directed by current U-M students, the play is based on both historical and fictional accounts of five female students as they work their way through the world attempting to assert themselves to their male counterparts, faculty, and the city of Ann Arbor itself.

The issue of women in male-dominated spheres remains an issue almost 150 years later. While U-M looks very different today, it’s revealing to look back at its origins to see how far we’ve come, as well as the bounds the University has left to make.

February 10 and 11 at 8 pm, and February 12 at 2 pm

Keene Theater, East Quad

Free  

REVIEW: Breaking News

IMG_1834

The paragraph-long “trigger warning” on the back of the playbill is not the only detail that sets “Breaking News” apart from the traditional play. The play was written and directed by the talented junior in the Residential College, Skyler Tarnas, who believes that these controversial topics that affect everyone should not be kept on the back burner.

This smart and complex comedy/tragedy splits up the many stories of citizens in the fictional town of Hiddlesville, and amps up the drama in the final scene when all of their worlds collide. First, we are introduced to Amanda Hart (Rowan Richards) who is a war veteran, hesitant to participate in the county Veterans’ Parade. She is befriended by Leon James (Kyle Stefak), a timid boy who persuades Amanda to march and be honored for her services. We later find out that Leon has been taken under the corrupted wing of Milo Hawkes (Paul Mayer), a troubled 28-year-old. Together, they make bombs to “make the world care…to make people feel something.” In fact, a few seconds later, a bomb goes off at the parade and places Amanda Hart in critical care. Leon is devastated. Milo takes the bomb’s energy and drives forward, planning the next attack.

The scenes shift and we are introduced to the police station, where the officers are trying to locate the bombers and put a stop to the terrorism. Agent Frederick Dole (Alex Bernard) volunteers to head the search. Meanwhile, the audience is tuned into the “Breaking News” reports with your host, Jack Kingsley (Travis Reilly). After each bombing, Kingsley breaks in with report after report, with each one becoming less and less accurate. In the tense last scene where Agent Dole and Leon are facing each other down the barrel of their guns, breaks suddenly into…the PLOT TWIST that no one saw coming. With all of the cameras and spotlights on her, Leon’s crazy aunt leaps out of a box she had been hiding in for hours and shoots Leon in the back because she wants to be “the hero” and receive televised fame.

I asked Tarnas to explain the message he hoped his viewer’s would get out of the play. I was interested in his new genre, “a comedic tragedy.” How could someone possibly make innocent deaths funny? In his own words, he says, “Tragedy is tragedy. It’s sad. People die. There’s no escaping that. But there’s also no escaping the fact that with the media devoting an insane amount of attention to every sad event they see, there’s a lot of comedy to be had. You don’t know whether to cry at the dead people on the screen, or laugh at the fact that CNN has Nancy Grace and Ashleigh Banfield in the same parking lot on a split screen. It’s that conflict that I chose to base the play on.”

Indeed, the satire of it all came from the broadcasting narrative. People who believe their job is more important than their life. That entertainment and fame is more important than the truth. The playbill’s “Director’s Note,” posited the insightful question, “What really is so different between a terrorist and a troubled young man?” Why do we so often demonize ‘foreigners’ for causing trouble when we have ‘terrorists’ in our own country? Tarnas pokes fun at broadcast racism when Jack Kingsley pronounces the young men’s American names, Leon James and Milo Hawkes, as ‘Layon Hammays’ and ‘Meelo Hawkees.’

Tarnas presents family issues as one possible reason why people are hardened by the world. He creates a subplot, shown as a brilliant flashback, of Leon’s childhood at home. After his dad left the family, his mother (Sara Head) began dating a new man, who hated Leon. They moved in with the boyfriend, but the mother slowly began to grow annoyed by having Leon around. She wanted him to leave her and her new ‘guy’ alone. Tarnas beautifully staged these memories with the simplicity of a spotlight, metaphorically acting as the inside of Leon’s brain. All Leon ever wanted was for his mother to notice him, to love him. Perhaps, terrorists aren’t looking for the world’s attention. They really want the attention from the only one who can’t give it to them.

A similar story of family hardship follows Agent Frederick Dole, who has a wife (Anne Marie Barry) and two children at home, yet he has lost interest in being a father. He tells his wife that “his job is the only thing that makes him feel alive.” It is this paralleling of narratives that fleshes out the entire play and makes all of the characters so well-rounded.

One thing that really struck me happened in the tense and emotional last scene. Leon James, sits in the empty warehouse, remote control in hand. One press of the thumb and he can make the entire broadcasting studio explode. Agent Frederick Dole finds him and tries to coax him out of it. Leon explains that the reason why he makes bombs is to make people feel something. Tragedy makes us come together. Which I actually found, frightfully, so true. After both man-made and natural disasters, social media is bombarded with funds, raising money for the victims. People hold a little tighter to their families and loved ones. The true tragedy occurs after Leon James is shot by his aunt and dies. Agent Dole’s wife has found the bomb and deactivated it (yay! for strong female roles!), which means that even if Leon had pressed the remote control, nothing would have happened. Leon did not have to die.

I’m not even sure I can explain the emotional roller coaster that this play took me on. At times, I laughed at the slapstick humor, which though sometimes a little silly or overdramatic, I understand why it was necessary. The play could have worked as just a tragedy, but the mood lighteners made us appreciate the actors’ performance skills even more. Not just anyone can deliver both comic and tragic lines with such control. At other times, I curled myself into a ball, hands over my ears, preparing for the gun to go off, while chanting in my head, “Don’t do it. Don’t shoot!” That is the magic of the play. We lose sense of the fictionality of the play, and it becomes all too real. The team of Tarnas’ brilliant writing and the amazing skill of the actors who brought it to life was an astounding success….and that is ‘breaking news.’