PREVIEW: SMTD@UMMA

europe_on_paper_website_slider_v1
from umma.umich.edu

If you’re an indecisive appreciator of art, or an enthusiast of all forms, the upcoming SMTD@UMMA performance, Image in Motion, is for you. In this collaboration between the Department of Dance and the University of Michigan Museum of Art, U-M Dance students will use UMMA’s new exhibit Europe on Paper as inspiration for the performance. The Europe on Paper collection features the work of German and Austrian Expressionist painters; dancers will interpret the works’ emotion and color through movement.

These two artistic modes lie close to my heart, and based on past STMD@UMMA performances, the beauty of UMMA’s gallery space only further brings SMTD work to life. This marriage of artistic forms is happening Thursday, November 17 at 7:30 in UMMA, and is free and open to the public.

REVIEW: C. Dale Young Reading & Booksigning

I readily admit that I tend to avoid both poets and poetry. Whether it’s the dense arrangement of words or the way I stereotype poets as aloof and didactic, I don’t give them as much thought.

C. Dale Young, MD, MFA, proves why I’m wrong. I was drawn immediately to him because he has an MFA, but he also went on to medical school, and is now a practicing physician in Redwood, California. So while he was certainly poetic, he was also warm, polite and engaging.

Dr. Young’s poetry is a blend of soul and landscape, in addition to the body. His poems wove through the fabric of his life, mixing in a bit of science here, a dash of hapless romance there, and a zesty topping of fantasy.

As most poets do, Dr. Young’s poetry contains gems such as:

“Things always beg for significance, would that we had time to come back to them”

And:

“No one talks about joy anymore; it is more taboo than love”

He saved the two best ones, however, for the very end. “The Bridge” is available online, and is a whimsical piece about love. On the exact other end of the spectrum was “Torn,” a moving piece about him suturing a victim of homophobic assault and his fear of suffering the same fate.

There is also a recording of “One More Thing” here.

For the audience’s sake, Dr. Young kept his poems short, and his commentary in between readings was also curt, but often humorous. This is a poet to explore, if you ever have the chance.

 

 

 

PREVIEW: Kazuo Ishiguro

Image Courtesy Michigan Union Ticket Office

In order to celebrate his newest publication, The Buried Giant, bestselling novelist Kazuo Ishiguro is bringing the party to Ann Arbor!!! Ishiguro was born in Nagasaki, Japan, but moved to England at a very early age. His cross-cultured background often plays a huge role in his most popular books, including “The Remains of the Day” and “Never Let Me Go,” both which have been turned into highly acclaimed films.

The talk, part of the Zell Visiting Writers Series, will be focused mostly on the release of the new novel, which relays the mystical journey of Axl and Beatrice across a declining Saxon England in search of their missing son. But if you haven’t read it yet (I haven’t either), don’t let that stop you from going!!! I’m in a class right now (Modern British Travel Narratives) and we are currently reading “The Remains of the Day,” a book that has touched me with its language so tenderly. Somehow, Ishiguro makes his reader feel so much for a stolid butler who hardly shows his emotions at all. Kazuo Ishiguro is a master of words and no doubt, an inspiration to all practicing writers.

*This event is free, but because of the expected crowd, tickets must be shown at the door. Tickets are available at the Michigan Union Ticket Office (or 734-763-TKTS).

What: Kazuo Ishiguro Reading

Where: University of Michigan Museum of Art; within the Forum Entrance (the modern entrance by the sculpture)

When: Thursday, March 26 at 6-7. (Book signing will take place earlier from 5-6).

How Much?: Free! But don’t forget to present your ticket!!!

More info about the event can be found here!

And check out this awesome Paris Review interview with Ishiguro in the meantime!

PREVIEW: Norton Juster Lecture at UMMA

Image Courtesy via rmichaelson.com

He breathed life into such beloved classic characters as Tock the Dog, the Humbug, King Azaz, the Mathmagician, the Princesses Rhyme and Reason, and of course, Milo. He is Norton Juster, the author of The Phantom Tollbooth, a book that celebrates the paradox of youthfully growing up, plays with the English language, and perfectly times intellectual puns. Although the book is consistently labeled as “children’s literature,” critics often acknowledge that the wordplay and extended metaphor of achieving wisdom would totally go over children’s heads. Nevertheless, the plot, the characters, and the essence of the book is translatable across all ages. It’s a story that a family can read together and all gain something from the experience. I first read it last year as a sophomore in college, and it instantly bumped up to one of the most influential books I’ve ever read. And I am beyond excited to announce that Norton Juster has been invited to speak about Children’s Literature and his process of writing The Phantom Tollbooth, as part of the Zell Visiting Writer Series.

The talk will begin with a documentary called “The Phantom Tollbooth: Beyond Expectations” and will be followed with an invigorating Q&A with Juster himself. Come for the inspiration, the whimsy, and the great word puns.

What: Norton Juster Lamstein Lecture in Children’s Literature

Where: University of Michigan Museum of Art (UMMA), Helmut Stern Auditorium

When: Thursday, March 12 at 5:10 – 7

How Much?: Free!!!!

 

REVIEW: Witch Exhibition in the UMMA

Got a minute? Gather a few of your friends together and then tell them to each draw a picture of a unicorn. Chances are they will all include a horse with a mane and a horn sticking out of its forehead – plus or minus a few stars and rainbows. Next, tell your friends to draw a picture of a witch. Suddenly, we have a whole spectrum of possibilities. Is she old or young? Wrinkly skin with craggily nose and warts? Is she wearing a hat? Is she a peasant in Salem, Massachusetts? Does she ride a broom or stay on the ground with her cat and her cauldron? Does she look like Hermione or Luna? Really, the only constant is that she’s a she. It is quite remarkable that the witch, like the unicorn, is an imaginative construct. And yet, we have no collective idea of what she looks like!

I’m in the course here at U-M called “The History of Witchcraft.” One of our assignments was to visit the U-M Museum of Art and check out their limited-time collection of “Witch” art. The small collection of only 15 pieces is located down the stairs in the basement of the modern Frankel Family Wing. The collection mostly displays printed etchings by Francisco de Goya. These etchings are a part of his larger work, “Los Caprichos,” which mostly serve as a satirical medium for Goya’s criticism of 18th century Spanish society. (This video by the San Jose Museum of Art describes wonderfully Goya’s Caprices in more detail. You can even click on each individual etchings to learn more about the hidden meanings.)

I can’t show pictures here because of copyright issues; all the more reason to go see them yourself! But I can describe to you a few that really caught my attention: either because they were so disturbing or because they simply confounded me. The collection ranges from Goya’s Early Modern prints to 20th-century abstract drawings and photography. One of my absolute favorites was “The Witch with the Comb” by Paul Klee. I loved how it was not obvious that the drawing was of a witch.

To me, the woman immediately struck me as an abstract 1920’s flapper rendition of the Queen of Hearts. Her hair was cut in an asymmetrical bob, she wore a shawl and jewelry, and her cocktail dress even had a fringe trim. She definitely looked like an upper-class woman, or at least, like a middle-class woman attempting to look like an aristocrat. Her face was stern with a straight across eyebrow and a pinched little chin. The strange thing about the woman was that her arms were drawn to look like arrows, pointing downward (“towards HELL!” I joked). Why did Paul Klee choose to disfigure this noble woman? The lack of hands dehumanized her, while drawing your attention down to the bottom of the picture. Now you notice her shoes – prototypical ‘witch’ shoes with a curled tip.  Is this woman secretly a witch? Klee reminds us again of the idea that anyone can be a witch. All you have to do is call her one, which he has done in the title. We read in class that many witches could transform themselves into more attractive, humanistic women. I guess even witches can make mistakes sometimes and leave their identities exposed to those who notice the small details.

You could easily spend an hour staring at these 15 pieces, which seem to have more significance when brought together in one glass case. You can contrast and compare, noticing witchy details that are marked in this print and not that. Why did he choose to obscure her leg here? What is he trying to hide? Take a friend and ask each other questions. Start with a simple: what is going on here? I promise you – that will be enough to keep your mind active.

I believe that UMMA will keep this Witch Exhibition up for another week or two. Don’t miss this rare opportunity to see how real artists have attempted to portray witches in their work.  Maybe your witch drawing will be more similar than you ever expected.

Review–Seeing is Believing / A Consideration of Image, Memory, and the Velocity of Time

The UMMA has recently installed an exhibition in their new media gallery located on the main floor entitled Performing Still Images: David Claerbout and Matthew Buckingham. The exhibition problematizes the relationship between photography, film, and time. Buckingham’s piece, “Image of Absalon Projected Until it Vanishes”, features a still image with the intention that the image continually deteriorates over the course of its exhibition. I saw this piece for the first time Wednesday, and it had already deteriorated to the point where Absalon’s figure is barely recognizable, and many of the finer details of the photograph have already disintegrated. The piece is a haunting reminder of the limitations of the medium—although we tend to see photography as an art form that immortalizes a snapshot of time, Buckingham reminds us that the medium, like our own memory, is faulty and transitory, ultimately worn away like all other things by time. Claerbout’s piece, “The American Room”, is a 25 minute video of a series of still photographs taken from a room—it is as if someone hit a pause button—everyone is eerily still. Although the images are still, the Claerbout has manipulated the images using green-screen technology to create the effect of a moving camera within each shot—audiences see sweeping pans and changing camera angles over these stills, a seemingly impossible phenomenon.
This Wednesday, I attended the exhibit and a panel discussion on the artists afterward. The exhibit featured a curator, two local artists, and a visiting lecture through the Stamps school, all individuals from unique artistic backgrounds who lended the audience their insight in hopes of achieving a greater understanding of the internal meaning the exhibit presents. During this exhibition, the panel addressed themes relevant not only to the two works in the exhibition, but also relevant to each artist’s entire body of work.
After viewing Claerbout’s earlier work, I understood his artistic progression to the piece I saw in person, his tremendous fascination with the social reality of time as opposed to the objective reality of time—in other words, real time versus experienced time. The computer generated effect of camera movement imposed on still images detached me from the subject I was viewing—rather than attempt to identify with the characters in the photo, I identified with the photographer, who must choose one ideal vantage point out of thousands of possibilities in order to capture the emotion of his or her subject. Another fascinating idea the panel discussed was the idea of experiencing filmic time while viewing a still image—Claerbout turns a still image into a 25-minute film that is compelling enough to keep people watching. In some sense, he’s creating something out of nothing.
Buckingham’s also considers the distinction between experienced and real time. His decaying photograph is like a metaphor for memory—our own perception of the experiences we have had in our lifetime is imperfect and fleeting. The longer it has been since the event we are recalling, the more fuzzy the details get, the more likely we are to remember the event in question incorrectly. My personal interpretation of Buckingham’s work was a confrontation with the mortality of human experience. We believe we can immortalize our experiences by logging historical records and photographs, but we forget that these records are also vulnerable to the passage of time.
Needless to say, the exhibition features fascinating and creative works of art that challenge the limits of what their medium is capable of, and present some stirring philosophical and metaphysical questions to mull over. I highly recommend attending UMMA’s hub lecture series to students interested in the UMMA’s exhibitions. The panels are an opportunity to gain a deeper introduction into an artist’s work, and to glean understanding into the artist’s personal philosophy, which in my opinion enhances the museum experience as a whole.

Read more about the exhibit here: http://www.umma.umich.edu/view/exhibitions/2013-davidclaerbout.php

Some links to videos presented during the panel discussion:
Claerbout’s “Piano Player”
Bas Jan Ader’s “The Fall”—This is pretty funny to watch on repeat
Bill Viola’s “Reflection Pool”—A 7 minute video that is a time commitment, but well worth a contemplative viewing.