REVIEW: God of Carnage

“We are all civilized people, wich means that we are all savages at heart but observing a few amenities of civilized behavior.” -Tennessee Williams

Tonight in Studio 1, the liberal principles of two married couples were torn to shreds before my very eyes in 80 short minutes. Of course, this spectacle was in the guise of a play called God of Carnage by playwright Yasmina Reza, but does that make it any less real? Basement Arts (the source of tonight’s entertainment) is a long-standing student organization, but student organization it nonetheless remains. As such, this means that the quality of the shows they put on is hit-and-miss. “Hit-and-miss” is the nature of all theatre, professional, student, or amateur – but you would be mistaken if you were to suppose that the hits are irreproachable and that the misses are worthless. The directors, performers, and designers for Basement Arts are all students, and this means that, hit or miss, everyone in the room can learn from any kind of performance. In a sense, this is educational theatre – as educational for the actors as for the audience.

Let me first make myself plain: tonight was a success. I have been to nearly every Basement Arts production in the last year, and I must confess myself far more impressed than usual. The scenery was suggestive without being minimalist or reductionist, and I didn’t hesitate to suspend my disbelief. The props were especially clever (particularly the pillow – but I’m getting ahead of myself; we’ll come to that). The momentum of the play was airtight; kudos to director Austin M. Andres on that score. The small cast of four actors had a tough job – Reza’s work is difficult to execute effectively – but I think on the whole it was done right, and done right, the play is monstrously funny and appallingly delicious.

The setting of the play is the living room of Michael and Veronica Valone (Josh Aber and Zoe Kanters). They have invited Alan and Annette Reille (Nick Skardarasy and Emma Sohlberg) over to discuss an incident involving the couples’ sons, who were involved in a physical altercation at a public park. Rather, the Valones’ son was struck in the face by a branch wielded by the Reilles’ son, and the two couples attempt to make some kind of an understanding about it. For a minute or so, all seems civilized – if strained – but soon the pretense gives way to unbounded cruelty. It’s almost like Lord of the Flies, only the people are adults and the “island” is a living room.

Each actor tonight surprised me in various ways, but Skardarasy as the viciously intelligent Alan deserves mention as the stand-out performance of the night. Not once did I doubt the reality of his being. He embodied people I know, people I get along with famously, people I hate – all in the span of eighty minutes. His deadpan comic timing was right on – it was Alan’s deadly seriousness that made him funny, his dry and witty sense of humor that made him loathsome. Certainly God of Carnage was very well cast by a director who knew precisely what he wanted: clear archetypes. Emma Sohlberg was instantly recognizable as the almost Gothically prim wife of harried Alan, presumably a law advisor for a pharmaceutical company currently under scrutiny. His constant incoming phone calls were something of a joke throughout the play. Kanters as Veronica made a convincing self-righteous (and selfish) bleeding-heart liberal, while Josh Aber had a respectable run as her affable, simple, husband.

The genius of this kind of play (and its translator – let’s give credit here where it’s due – Christopher Hampton translated admirably this masterwork from the original French) is that, similarly to Chekhov’s best plays, no one character is the hero or heroine, yet no one is the villain. Still, this isn’t realism. Each character represents all of us, in a way – not entirely a victim, not entirely culpable; but at the end of the day, there is a mixture of pity and hatred for these characters. This is the only way that a play such as this can be successful.

A moment should now be taken to appreciate a part of the play that was so convincing it was almost alarming. Annette, after eating some of Veronica’s cooking, becomes ill, and yes, vomits onstage. Moments like this are so easy to glaze over, to half-ass, or to present apologetically because the director could not find a way to present it without looking foolish and phony. Not so in this case. I am told the vomit was very cleverly concealed inside a pillow that Annette held moments before she “puked.” It actually looked so real that it took a few minutes for me to decide fully that it had indeed been staged, since the characters were moving on with the play and not pausing to inform us that Ms. Sohlberg was truly ill. A very loud hand for this brilliantly conceived moment.

Of course, there were bits that annoyed me somewhat. A couple of times, I felt that the director was reaching for comedy by trying to force a laugh out of a moment that didn’t really warrant one – instead of playing the truth of the characters’ emotions and letting the audience decide when to laugh. This is certainly when the play was weakest. Happily, I can report that these moments were few and overall not corrosive to the rest of the play. Indeed, the truth of moments is what is memorable (Alan stonily quips, “Our son is a savage,” without a hint of bitterness or irony – it’s hilarious); the moments that tried to produce comedy rather than truth were forgettable. Cheaply manufactured “comic” moments rob themselves of humor and rarely make us laugh – one of the great paradoxes of the theatre.

All that aside, though, I enjoyed myself very thoroughly; something of that savage nature displayed in the four characters is awakened in the spectator, who gruesomely revels in the way the couples tear each other to shreds. It’s delightful. One of the greatest structural elements in the play is the way that the characters form and dissolve alliances with the speed of a bullet. Husband and wife wrestle with husband and wife; the next moment, it’s men versus women; at some times, it’s three-on-one. It is probably the most disconcerting and truthful element of the playwright’s storytelling: these are things that we all do. Consciously or not (probably not), we truly are savages competing under the laws of the “God of Carnage” invoked by Alan towards the end.

This is a play where each person starts out with noble intentions, and then for one reason or another, abandons them for the laws of the jungle. It’s important to note that all four people “lose” something important to them: Alan’s phone, his precarious link to his high-stakes job, is drowned in the flower pot by his own wife (she’s made bold by her drunkenness at this point); Veronica’s book is ruined by Annette’s vomit; Michael’s excellent rum is all drunk (again, mostly by Annette), and moreover, his secret phobia of rodents is made humiliatingly public; and by the end, Annette has lost her dignity, reduced to a sobbing wreck (“It’s the worst day of my life, as well”).

If tonight’s show is anything to reckon by, this will be a good year for Basement Arts. Let’s keep these hits coming.

PREVIEW: Bat Boy, the Musical

Yes, Bat Boy. The School of Music, Theatre, & Dance will be performing the musical at the Arthur Miller Theatre, Nov. 15-18. This American musical was written by Keythe Farley and Brian Flemming with music and lyrics by Laurence O’Keefe. The plot is based on a June 23, 1992 Weekly World News story about a half-boy, half-bat, dubbed “Bat Boy”, who grew up living in a cave. It has never made it to Broadway, but succeeded for several years Off Broadway, winning several awards such as the Elliot Norton Award, the Richard Rodgers Development Award, and the Richard Rodgers Production Award. I think it’s going to be good, and it’s by the Musical Theatre school so, needless to say, expectations should be high.

Bat Boy the Musical
Bat Boy the Musical

Get your tickets soon!!

citations:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_Boy:_The_Musical
http://events.umich.edu/event/9696-1171537

PREVIEW: God of Carnage

It seems that my tastes of late have been very French. First I reviewed Ionesco’s Rhinocéros, and now I’m tackling Yasmina Reza, another French writer. His play God of Carnage depicts an evening involving two children’s respective parents. The action is centered around a playground scuffle between the children in a public park; the pairs of parents meet to discuss the incident in a civilized fashion. Yet as the play progresses, the parents behave more and more childishly and soon we see just how quickly their pretense of civility falls away to reveal the chaos within. I’ve been told the play is uproariously funny. Best yet, and like all Basement shows, it’s free!

What: God of Carnage

Where: Walgreen Drama Center, Studio 1

When: 7:00, tonight, October 27

For more information, visit www.basementarts.org/

I would like to note that in my experience with Basement Arts, the audience isn’t as varied as it could (and should) be. I see mostly people from the theatre or musical theatre program there to support their friends, a few parents, and even fewer strangers. Basement Arts has provided free theatre to the University and its students for nearly a quarter of a century; I urge anyone who can attend this play, or future productions, to do so. Theatre is a vital part of the cultivated life, and what’s more, it’s great fun and an opportunity to get out and meet people!

PREVIEW: Monkeys and Playbills

Head over to Arthur Miller Theatre November 8-10 to see Basement Arts’ FREE performance of “[Title of Show]”. Basement Arts is an entirely student-run performance network on campus and their shows are always beyond one’s expectations. The show, [Title of Show], is super clever. It tells the story of four friends who band together to write a musical. The songs are great, the laughs are rich, and its a great time. I can’t wait to see the show and you shouldn’t either! AND IT’S FREE!

Title of Show
Title of Show

Hope to see you there 🙂
more info on their website: www.basementarts.org

REVIEW: Sunday in the Park with George

Friday night, I had the privilege of seeing “Sunday in the Park with George” as performed by the Musical Theatre Department here at the School of Music, Theatre, & Dance. The premise of the show is the story of Georges Seurat, the creator of the famed painting “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte”. He struggles with success and criticism of his work in his time period, never having sold a painting during his lifetime. He has difficulties balancing work and his relationships with others and ends up losing his mistress and model, Dot, to another. George is an interesting character in a lot of ways. His concentration to his art and failure at succeeding at much else for one thing is quite perplexing and the attention to detail in his work is astonishing. The show mentioned also that it took him two years to finish the painting “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte”. I thought the musical did a lot to represent accurately Seurat’s work habits and advanced concentration to his work.

The show was definitely a success, the actors and actresses, singing, and dancing was entirely up to par, as anticipated. Some standouts from the show include the actress performing the role of Dot. Her voice was absolutely phenomenal and she totally reminded me of Bernadette Peters, who played the role while it was on Broadway. The lead, George, was so good at mimicking a crazed artist, affixed in both his paintings and his work. He flitted around the stage, particularly in the scene “The State of the Artist,” where he hovered between appearing interested in potential investors and posing for photographs. It was a whirlwind of a scene and it played to his strong points.

The middle of the show, in all honesty, was sort of a snore. The three hour-long performance droned on and I felt bored with the nitty-gritty of the plot while the songs seemed to me rather dull. The first act was definitely better than the second, but it still wasn’t entrancing. I truly believe, however, that this was due entirely to the writers of the show and not the men and women of the Musical Theatre department. I think the show isn’t Sondheim’s best, but it is such a cool concept, basing the entire plot and musical numbers on a single painting and its artist – it’s worth portraying. I think with a few more crowd-pleasing numbers and less dialogue-heavy scenes, it would have worked better.

All was restored for me, including the immensely boring middle parts, when that final song “Sunday” was performed at the ends of both acts. It’s such a beautiful song and the melodies seem to flow directly from the heart. It has the usual Sondheim ring to it, finishing with a bang and a grand flourish of the arm. I loved it. And when the musical ended and the backdrop went white, Dot leaves the stage while George’s final word coincides with the emotions of the audience: Harmony.

I don’t believe I would recommend the show to a friend if it were inconvenient for them to see it; although, if it was right in your backyard with an amazing cast, I wouldn’t say no to a ticket. Glad I saw it, but glad it’s over. Can’t wait for what show they put on next.

PREVIEW: Sunday in the Park with George

This weekend come see the stunning U-M Musical Theatre department perform the beloved Sondheim production “Sunday in the Park with George”! Inspired by the painting “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” by Georges Seurat, this fictionalized story tells of this painter’s life and his interactions with his lover and model, Dot. The book is by James Lapine, who also worked on such popularized shows as “Into the Woods,” “Falsettos,” and “Passion.” He frequently collaborates with Stephen Sondheim and this show is considered one of their best (info from wikipedia.org)

“A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” by Georges Seurat
“A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” by Georges Seurat

The show is running October 11th-21st at the Mendelssohn Theatre – buy your tickets soon!!