REVIEW: The Turn of the Screw

I was a little apprehensive going into The Penny Seats Theatre Company’s performance of The Turn of the Screw, this Thursday at the First Congregational Church of Ann Arbor. I had just recently finished reading the book version of The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James, and I had no idea of what to expect in terms of seeing it done on the stage — especially since I knew the production was only going to involve two actors.

When the lights went out at the beginning of the production and the church filled with the eerie voices of children singing, I already knew it was bound to be a good time. From then on out, in my opinion, the night was a success.

The show featured two actors: Mary Dilworth and Will Myers. Dilworth played the main character, the governess from whose perspective the entire story is told. Myers, very interestingly, played every single other character: the narrator; the handsome bachelor who recruits her to work at his estate; Mrs. Grose, the elderly caretaker of the estate and the governess’s ally; and Miles, the precocious, secretive, and endlessly creepy ten-year-old of whom the governess is charged with taking care. There is a second child, the young Flora, but there is no actor at all for her; her presence is only mimed by the other characters, addressed as thin air.

Considering this, it must be emphasized how impressive both of these actors were. Dilworth played with and cradled the invisible Flora so convincingly that she may as well have actually been there. She played the governess with an enthusiastic, girlish charm that I wasn’t expecting, but found completely believable. Myers, meanwhile, slipped so easily between his roles that it never once managed to come across as confusing, not even when he was given less than a second to transition.

The Turn of the Screw tells the story of the young woman, who is “seduced” into taking the job of the governess at Bly, an isolated estate in the countryside. The strange happenings that follow prompt her to question what happened between the previous governess, Miss Jessel, and the now-deceased gardener, Peter Quint; why Jessel and Quint are dead, and why they now seem to haunt the premises; and what part the innocent-seeming children, Miles and Flora, have to play in all of it. Needless to say, it is a classic ghost story, which means that most of the audience probably came to the church looking to get scared. (At least, I did.) The production did not disappoint–Myers and Dilworth utilized the entire church space, walking between the pews and lurking behind the rows and up in the balconies, so that it came to feel like the play was taking place not just before us, but all around us. The church ended up being the absolute perfect setting for the play, really lending itself to the element of creepiness.

I also really enjoyed seeing the textual changes made between the novel and the play adaptation. There were a lot of elements added–for instance, Miles’s affinity for riddles, and some surprising encounters between Miles and the governess. I won’t spoil everything, but it’s definitely a production worth checking out, especially if you’re looking to get into the spirit of the Halloween season. The Penny Seats Theatre Company will be putting the play on for two more weekends at the First Congregational Church of Ann Arbor, at 8:00 p.m.

REVIEW: 1984

1984 is a beautiful and thought-provoking film that asks necessary questions about the role that government plays in people’s personal lives. Based on the 1949 book by George Orwell, the film was directed by Michael Radford and stars John Hurt, Richard Burton, Suzanna Hamilton, and Cyril Cusack.

The screening that took place Tuesday night was free to all University of Michigan students, but there were also tickets available for non-students, and the crowd was made up of a surprisingly wide array of people. There were college students and adults of all ages, couples and family groups, and altogether the theater was filled almost completely, which made the experience particularly exciting.

The event was put on by U of M’s Film & Video Student Association. Before the screening, they explained that they were going to have an introductory clip of Radford speaking a little about the film, and that after the film they would show a segment of an interview done with Radford. Due to a mislabeling of the tapes, they ended up showing a clip of the interview first instead, which was actually really interesting to see.

Radford talked a lot about how quickly the film had been put together – apparently he decided to make it at the end of 1983, since he realized it was almost 1984 and it would be great for a film adaptation of the book to be released then, and it was released in September of 1984. He also talked about the film’s terrific leading cast: Burton, who had a reputation for alcoholism at the time but who didn’t touch a drink during the making of the film; Hamilton, who stood out among hundreds of women who auditioned for the role of Julia; and Hurt, whom Radford actually approached first and told him that if he wouldn’t take the role of Winston Smith, then Radford wouldn’t make the movie. According to Radford, Hurt responded by saying, “Well, I’m not going to stop you from making this movie.”

It’s a good thing Hurt was on board, because the movie was terrific. I had never seen it before this screening, and I was worried that I wouldn’t be able to remember enough from the book for it to make sense, but the reality of the film was perfectly clear to anyone who had or hadn’t read the book beforehand. 1984 tells the story of Winston Smith, who lives in a dystopian country called Oceania, which is forever at war with one of two other countries (Eurasia and Eastasia). Under the political regime of the powerful Inner Party, citizens are controlled in every aspect by the government, and are expected to obey the government wholeheartedly and without question. The extent of censorship is so great that even “thoughtcrime” is severely punishable, which comes into play for Winston when he falls in love with a girl named Julia, even though the only love he is supposed to truly feel is his love for the party.

1984 is not a happy story by any means, and the story in the film was told in a way that was beautiful, terrifying, and devastating. Hurt in particular was amazing to watch because he so fully captured the last vestige of humanity that Winston clings to in spite of the government – the love in his heart, the “spirit of man” – which made it shattering to see the twisted ways in which the government worked to undermine his identity, to the point where even he himself came to question it. These are themes that resonated with audiences years before 1984, and they continue to resonate with us now. Although the film was made many years ago, this is a story that we should never stop telling.

PREVIEW: 1984

Tonight at Lorch Hall, the Film & Video Student Association will be hosting a screening of classic film 1984. 1984 is based on the 1949 novel of the same name by George Orwell, which narrated the story of Winston Smith, a man living in a dystopian future in which everything and everyone is subject to extreme censorship and surveillance by the government. 1984 realizes many fears that the public has regarding suppressive political parties and government interference in the lives of the people, and it gives its audience many interesting things to think about, especially during a time when these issues are at the forefront of so many people’s minds.

I read the book 1984 a few years ago, but I have yet to see the movie, so I’m very excited about the screening. The movie was made a long time ago, and the book upon which it is based is even older, but I have a feeling that there will still be plenty of thoughts and ideas in the film that are all too relevant. It will be showing from 9:00 to 11:30 PM tonight at 140 Lorch Hall, and the event will be free to all students.

REVIEW: Beauty and the Beast

This year’s remake of Beauty and the Beast revives a classic story with which most of us are familiar, in which the young Belle sacrifices herself for a life of captivity in order to save her father, only to end up falling in love with her captor. Long ago cursed by an enchantress, this prince has been trapped in the form of an animal-like Beast, and his household servants have been turned into animated pieces of furniture. Belle befriends the furniture, falls for the Beast, and ultimately helps defend the isolated castle against the attack of the villagers, led by her own scorned lover, Gaston.

When I got to the theater, I was worried that all of the good seats might be gone, but we ended up being surprised: There were so many available showtimes and theaters that everyone was able to get in without a problem. The theater we ended up in was huge and filled with audience members of all ages.

I ultimately thought the movie was really entertaining. Everyone left the theater talking about how much this version had lived up to their expectations, and making comparisons between this and the classic animated movie. These comparisons are definitely fair, especially considering how so many of us grew up with that movie.

Personally, I thought this version was a worthwhile new addition to the legend. It didn’t contribute a ton of meaning that wasn’t already there in the first one, but it was fun to see the story brought to life in live action, and it did fill in the plot hole about what happened to Belle’s mother so many years ago. It was satisfying to see LeFou’s true feelings for Gaston recognized, and the animation of the furniture and the Beast himself worked terrifically alongside the rest of the human characters. Not to mention a girl falling in love with an animal can be a hard thing for some people to get behind, but Emma Watson and Dan Stevens did such a convincing job with the love story that by the time we got to the famous dancing-in-the-ballroom scene, everything made perfect sense.

The music was also terrific. The cast is full of talented singers, and I hadn’t paid much attention to the lyrics of the older version when I was younger, but listening to them made me understand the story a lot better this time. I couldn’t get enough of Mrs. Potts (Emma Thompson), the doting but strong teapot who looks after Belle when she is at her most uncertain, or Lumiere (Ewan MacGregor), the candlestick who retains a good attitude despite being trapped in this castle for so many years.

I ultimately found this to be a really enjoyable movie experience. It’s touching, thought-provoking, and just plain fun to watch, and anyone looking for a good retelling of this classic story is in for their money’s worth.

PREVIEW: Beauty and the Beast

I’ve been Google-Searching Beauty and the Beast on a regular basis for about four months now, and if the conversation among my friends is anything to go by, I haven’t been alone. Judging by the trailer, Disney has pulled out all the stops this time with special effects, an all-star cast, the company’s first openly gay character, and classic musical numbers redone by the likes of John Legend and Ariana Grande. Everyone knows the story of Belle – the smart, ambitious girl who sings about leaving her provincial town, who sacrifices herself to save her father, who learns to see past the Beast’s rough exterior. But that won’t stop any of us from wanting to see it again on the big screen.

And of course, it doesn’t hurt that I’m automatically down for anything that even remotely involves Emma Watson.

The movie will be showing in theaters nationwide (including the RAVE in Ann Arbor), starting this Friday, March 17th.