REVIEW: Nell David & Franny Choi

On Friday night, the Helmut Stern Auditorium of UMMA was a small and cozy literary haven away from the museum’s After Hours event beginning upstairs. Though I attended alone, several Zell MFA friend groups and writer-enthusiasts (and probably writers themselves) around me gathered and giggled while we all waited for fiction writer Nell David* and poet Franny Choi to take the stage. The atmosphere was excited and comfortable.

In the tenth installment of its kind, two current MFA students emceed this year’s Webster Reading series. David was the first to read, and one of the emcees read her introduction: at an AWP conference in Washington, DC, the two strolled from table to table finding magazines in which David’s work was published. In each, her last name was different – a detail that interested me from the get-go of the evening. “At age 25, she was writing better fiction than people five years out of their MFA programs and didn’t give a damn about the name she put on it,” the emcee joked.

David, or [redacted] as they had also earlier joked, took the stage with the first few pages of a short story called “Joyce is Better Now.” The story was about a single mother whose son had just moved out for his first year of college, and how she fell in love with a doctor she had been seeing. While I’ve been paying more attention to poetry than fiction these days, I was still struck by her characters and how she moved through the piece. Characters, notably Joyce herself, were relatable yet given realistic and unique voices. I was reminded of life itself as they focused on small desires in a big world: two themes I noticed were those desires of finding honesty in already friendly relationships and being candid yet kind. Her reading style was confident and reserved, and I appreciated that she laughed at a funny line of her own. The excerpt she read gave us just enough information that we didn’t get the entire story, but wanted to know what happened next and how Joyce’s endeavors turned out.

Next was Choi, introduced by a different student (I think – or peer). He introduced her personality as a poet and commended her talents: “Saying that you’re a famous poet is like saying you’re a famous mushroom. Franny is the morel of poets.”

I’ve seen videos of Choi doing slam poetry a few years before, but this was a new experience. Slam poetry usually consists of some storytelling with sounds written to be heard on stage alongside movement, and I could sense those sounds echoing in her work within wordplay and patterns that I wouldn’t have expected. Sound aside, the images evoked were abundant and worked into one another while working together and alongside one another – stunning. She spoke with her hands and read so confidently, too, which also made me think of spoken word and slam poetry trends. Again, I was struck by the writing, especially as a poet myself.

Her first work that she read was from a collection about conducting a Turing Test on herself to see whether she’s actually a robot, though she read different poems thereafter (including one I’ve seen recently, “On the Night of the Election”). Before reading “You’re So Paranoid,” she noted that she’d never read it aloud before, and took a short pause before starting. That small moment was so beautiful, and I wondered whether she was considering the best way to read it, or whether she was capturing the moment for herself and the poem. Another intriguing piece she read was partially in response to the conversation about allowing neo-nazis speak on campus and a video wherein Richard Spencer used an image of her face, “The Cyborg Watches a Video of a Neo-Nazi Saying Her Name.” I liked how she bookended her reading, ending with a piece called (and reading the title in a voice that reminded me of an AI voice) “So, How Do You Like Working with Humans?”

Something that I appreciated about her reading lineup was that she interspersed poems about the aforementioned collection with others unrelated to it, but still managed to flow from one to the next cohesively. It was well-rounded and full of incredible work.

There was lots of writer’s confidence in the auditorium that evening, which extended to me, and for which I was grateful. I encourage y’all to read and support these talented writers as well as those who share the community here in Ann Arbor and beyond – or at least attend an MFA reading at some point.

*I wanted to include links to Nell David’s work in this review, but had some trouble finding her online and would appreciate any located links in the comments!

PREVIEW: A Wrinkle in Time

The beloved 1962 book, A Wrinkle in Time, finally comes to the big screen. Directed by Ava DuVernay, this is the second attempt at an adaptation, hopefully more successful than the 2003 television film. This version features newcomer Storm Reid as Meg Murry. Meg sets out on an interdimensional adventure with her little brother, Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe) and her classmate Calvin (Levi Miller) to find her father. The journey promises to be fantastical, beautiful, and dangerous. Another interesting aspect of the movie is its star power.  Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon, and Mindy Kahling all have roles as Mrs. Which, Mrs. Whatsit, and Mrs. Who, respectively. A Wrinkle in Time is currently showing at the State Theater. Purchase tickets ($8 for students with ID), online at the Michigan Theater website or at the box office.

REVIEW: Border Crossers

I heard about this project when it was just getting started–with the call for student applicants. Now the project is complete, students and professors have designed, modeled, constructed, and tested their graceful, elephant-like, robot. Its completion itself is an incredible feat for everyone involved, especially as I consider how many brilliant ideas fizzle as we go about our busy lives as students. The thing itself is a 15-foot blow-up structure that arches over walls as it expands, creating the friendly sensation that someone is reaching out to you. It’s goal is to reflect what an actual structure to facilitate international border crossing would look like. But the full project is not part of this exhibit in the Institute for the Humanities gallery, open until March 23rd.

Instead, the exhibit sheds a unique light on the background and process that brought this art into being. There are large charcoal sketches on the walls, a mini model made with wood and plastic, and a binder of geometry, physics, and algebra plotting the logistics. This is the art behind the art, that we usually don’t see. It took me a minute to adjust to the idea that this was meant to show a process, not a grand product, and to appreciate the exhibit for what it was, the nitty gritty. However, seeing the visions and hopes the creators had for their project also kickstarted my imagination for how we can transform borders. The walls that the border crosser reached over were so foreboding, yet this team of people wanted to overcome them.

The process of creating the border crosser also helped surmount metaphorical borders, in bringing together people from across academic disciplines, from engineering to American cultures, to build and conceptualize the project. I don’t often think about technology intersecting with social issues, or SMTD students working with physics, but the breadth of this project forces viewers to stretch their preconceptions.

I think the most influential part of Border Crossers was the reminder that we can create beautiful things, even before we begin our careers. These students formed a cohesive groups and made something together all within the past few months, which is a pretty incredible achievement. The real world is happening now, and we can all be a part of it, even if we feel like we are not yet significant enough, not yet smart enough, not yet established enough, to produce something great.

REVIEW: A Wrinkle in Time

A Wrinkle in Time, the readapation of basically everyone’s favorite childhood book by Madeleine L’Engle, chronicles the adventure of young Meg Murray (Storm Reid), on a quest to find her father. In the process she unwilling becomes a warrior for the light against the evil of the universe. Calvin (Levi Miller) and her younger brother Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe) accompany her, guided by three seriously peculiar goddesses/guardians/celestial beings. In truth, the whole adventure is simply a coming of age story for the relentlessly teased Meg. It came so close to being a fantastic film, but tried to combine too many ideas in the space of two hours. (spoilers below)

This film felt so ordinary. Protagonist goes on a journey of self discovery and learns to love themself, aided by a corny love interest and powerful guiding forces who do nothing but offer unhelpful advice. To be clear, I have no problem with self discovery journeys. I do have a problem when the film relies on tropes and fails to add anything new. I was waiting anxiously for some plot twist or great reveal that would bump the film up the extra step it needed to greatness… aaaand nothing happened. I’m pretty sure I predicted about 96% of the film accurately.

So, the second problem. I think part of the reason it felt so discombobulated was because there were really cool elements that had the potential to be really interesting, but were kept at surface level. For example, Meg’s father discovered the tesseract, a higher dimension (???) which enables people to teleport across the universe when they tap into the right frequency. And I have so many questions!! How did her father learn this? He’s been missing for four years, so why didn’t he just tesserate back? What even is this higher dimension?? I understand this is a fantasy/science fiction movie, so I’m already suspending a lot of belief. But, it can only go so far. Like, if I’m going to accept people can tesserate across the universe there better be flawless worldbuilding that backs it up.

A lot of the film felt progressive; major lines were dropped about accepting oneself both as a woman and/or a woman of color. Aspects of these deeper themes peeked out from the plot, but were then smothered by insanely corny lines and childish dialogue creating a push and pull between a more mature film to one aimed at little kids. (Literally, my friend and I were hard-core cringing half the film from second hand embarrassment). To be fair, the kids were splendid actors and the inclusion of Oprah was a definite bonus, but I wish the director had dug deeper and explained more. Director DuVernay had the right pieces in the puzzle but they didn’t stick together well.

Image: Disney

REVIEW: Thoroughbreds

We are fascinated by murder. We parse through the grisly details, not with glee, but with a relentless, morbid curiosity. Most of all, we are captivated by the murderer, the unnatural being who has deviated outside moral boundaries. Perhaps it is the rebellious nature of murder and the assertion of independence from seemingly binding rules that is so fascinating.

If so, there are no characters more appropriate than the teenage girls at the center of Thoroughbreds. Lily (Anya Taylor-Joy) and Amanda (Olivia Cooke) are entirely products of their upper-class breeding. They are perfectly groomed, perfectly behaved. They are calm, cool, and confident. They are beautiful, shiny exteriors; cracked into a thousand pieces underneath. Amanda confesses to feeling nothing. Lily despises her step-father. Together, they plan a murder. It is a simple enough premise, made interesting because of the characters. These are two girls that are fundamentally broken, but well-trained enough to hide it. This leaves the audience constantly guessing at their motivations and questioning any display of emotion. The film takes advantage of the eagerness to psychoanalyze and constantly toys with curiosity, offering one motive after another. It is a conceit that is at once intriguing and completely maddening because it allows the movie to get away without making its meaning clear. Instead, the film pursues multiple tracks, switching personalities as easily as the sociopaths it concerns. Thoroughbreds wants to be a character study, a critique of the rich, and a crime movie at the same time. It never succeeds entirely in any of these attempts, but the resulting combination is perhaps unsettling enough to leave a lasting impression.

An uneasiness permeates the film even as the camera cruises through opulent mansions and well-tended lawns. The over-the-top richness of the setting lends to the discomfiting feeling. Watching Lily and Amanda treat these luxuries for granted separates them and the situation even further from reality. It certainly leads to some good laughs, especially with the constantly present and entirely ambivalent staff at the mansion. However, in doing so, the film also becomes less consequential and more fantastical. The bizarre elements become more problematic when the character of Tim (Anton Yelchin) enters the movie. In contrast to the two girls, Tim is a drug dealer, a man desperate for money thrust into a world beyond his wildest dreams. He is proof that the there is another reality besides the insular world of the ridiculously rich. But the film cannot deign to fully explore what Tim represents. Instead, he is another prop for the girls to play with and discard. Perhaps, this too, is a choice to display the carelessness and abuse of the rich. It is just not a very complex or interesting one. The film wants to confront us with the damages, to question the systematic pursuit of money. However, it is so deeply embedded in the mindsets of those born to privilege that it only challenges these topics superficially.

More intriguing, is the relationship between Lily and Amanda which succeeds because it does not attempt to tackle the thorny issue of class. Instead, it relies entirely on the deadpan charisma of Cooke and the enigmatic talents of Taylor-Joy.  They have a natural rapport as they warily dance around each other. Cooke expands upon what could be a one-note role in the wrong hands. Taylor-Joy does equally good work by letting Lily’s moments of emotion surface through layers of repression. It is these two performances that give the film its twisted charm. Thoroughbreds’ greatest flaw is also its greatest strength. By refusing to elaborate on the details, it allows the audience to construct its own murder narrative. But it also doesn’t say much.

 

 

PREVIEW: Blithe Spirit, by the RC Players

A ghost story, but on stage! And it’s funny! In Blithe Spirit, a novelist invites a medium to his home to conduct a seance, so he can collect material for his new book. In the process, the ghost of his first wife is released from the spirit world and attempts to ruin his relationship with his current wife. Prepare for plot twists, deaths, and a sense of comedic doom. Written in 1941, this play lives on (unlike some of its characters).

Check it out in the Keene Theater in the East Quad basement, Friday, March 16th, and Saturday, March 17th, at 8pm! The show is free (though donations are appreciated) and you can see more information at the Facebook event!