PREVIEW: Phantom Thread

Phantom Thread promises to be a fascinating film featuring the work of two masters. It is the second collaboration between Paul Thomas Anderson and Daniel Day-Lewis after their 2007 masterpiece, There Will Be Blood.  The film concerns Day-Lewis’ character, Reynolds Woodcock, a renowned dress maker. In 1950s London, Woodcock is massively successful, dressing celebrities, socialites, and heiresses alike. However, his carefully plotted life and career suddenly change course when he meets Alma (Vicky Krieps). Alma fascinates him. She even acts as a muse for his fashion efforts. It would be silly to expect a conventional love story from Paul Thomas Anderson, though. He does not make anything according to expectations. Although, it will be fascinating to watch the movie purely for the aesthetic appeal of the beautiful clothing, Anderson also does not make shallow movies. All in all, this film is assuredly an exciting new entry by an American master director.  Phantom Thread is currently showing at the Michigan Theater. Tickets can be bought online or at the box office ($8 with a student ID).

 

PREVIEW: Dancing Globally

This Saturday I’ll go to a theater that that holds more than a thousand people and watch some of the talented students from the Dance Department, who I’ve never seen perform before. Having never been exposed to modern dance, I know seeing Dancing Globally is a promising first modern dance program to attend because of my friend who is in it, who has been practicing tirelessly.
Dancing Globally, already shown Thursday February 1st and Friday February 2nd, will be shown Saturday February 3rd at 8PM and Sunday February 4th at 2PM at the Power Center for the Performing Arts. Tickets can be purchased for a variety of prices here.

REVIEW: Bodies of Michigan exhibit

The Bodies of Michigan art exhibit put together by Natalie Giannos in Palmer Commons is located along the walls of the Windows Lounge.  That immediately made it difficult for me to look closely at the images because in order to do so, I needed to navigate around all the people studying and invade their space.  It also gave me the impression that while the images were in a public space, not many people were actually seeing them because they were so immersed in their own projects.  That made me a little upset because I found a lot of the pieces rather striking.  Therefore, I think a different venue would greatly benefit this exhibit if it’s going to run again next year — maybe something a little more intimate where the images can actually be observed closely.

The exhibit featured six images (there is a spot for a seventh image entitled “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not” Robin Rranza, but the picture looks like it was torn off the wall).  The collection overall was very colorful, with images like “Bad Boy Rebellion” also by Robina Rranza and “Alternatively…” by Sonalee Joshi.  I found this enjoyable because, despite the difference in medium, those two images captured two completely different types of people.  “Bad Boy Rebellion” could be representing more of a party scene whereas “Alternatively…” seemed a little more hipster and low-key.

Bad Boy Rebellion
Alternatively…

While the majority of this exhibit was colorful, there was one photograph that stuck out to me.  Entitled “Loveletter” by Mackenzie King, it was a picture of a seemingly nude woman in monochrome.  I really enjoyed looking at “Loveletter” because the centralization of light silhouetted the model’s body in such a way that emphasized her curves beautifully.  The title of the photograph and its content really worked well together, and I enjoyed its simplicity.

Loveletter

Another image was “Goiters Caused by Coulrophobia” by Adrian Hanna, which presented a depiction of what looked like the interior of the human body.  This was an interesting piece because it had some 3-D elements.  The final image was entitled “I Know” by yours truly, a picture of my friends posed underneath a bridge in the Arb.

Overall, I think I would have enjoyed the exhibit a lot more had it been held in, for instance, its own room.  Despite that, I loved the concept behind it and all the different interpretations of the human body.

PREVIEW: Constellations

“Who knew that higher physics could be so sexy, so accessible—and so emotionally devastating?”

The description of this play doesn’t give away many details, but once I saw this line from a New York Times review of the play, which had a run on Broadway starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Ruth Wilson, I was hooked. I love science and I love the arts, and it just gets better when they’re combined.

Constellations is about two people and the infinite pathways their relationship could follow. It’s not my usual type of show, but it sounds incredibly intriguing. I am really looking forward to seeing it.

The show is being performed by the Theatre Nova (410 W Huron Street). Tickets ($20) are on sale here. The show runs from January 26 through February 18. Showtimes are 8pm on Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays, and 2pm on Sundays.

REVIEW: Call Me By Your Name

It is the special power of youth that one can transform a thousand times in the course of one lazy, Italian summer. That sense of self has not set yet. Perhaps it is a gift. A chance at change instead of stagnation. However, sometimes one simply exchanges the frustration of monotony for the near constant confusion of growing up into someone you don’t understand or maybe even like. It is this process of metamorphosis that 17 year old Elio (Timothée Chalamet) undergoes one summer break. Every year, his father, a renowned professor of archeology, invites older graduate students to live with the family in the small, country side Italian town. However, the summer of 1983 is immediately different. Oliver (Armie Hammer) is handsome, intelligent, and seems intent on disturbing all the regular rhythms and, perhaps even, the tedium that has built up one lazy summer, after lazy summer. He is forward and confident. He ends every conversation with a brisk “Later”, as if he will always return. At first, Elio handles his discomfort with Oliver with impertinence and distance. However, as the summer passes by, week by week, Elio is prompted to act upon his feelings, even if they may not fit what he may think of himself.

The glorious landscapes surrounding Elio aid both him and the audience as he embarks on this journey. The summer blooms brilliantly in a sumptuous, bountiful glory. Every tree in the family orchard is bursting with ripeness and every river runs cold and clear. Every swim is followed by a glass of freshly squeezed apricot juice. The Italian countryside begs to be explored, with its shady secret areas perfect for two lovers. It is a place that Elio is both intimately familiar with and yet, has never understood to its fullest extent. The eternal greenery and idyllic lifestyle that it encourages allows Elio and the viewer to imagine that perhaps summer will never end. He allows chances to repeatedly pass him by, even as his feelings for Oliver become stronger. But nature also acts as a prompting agent, urging Elio to live as vividly as it does.

This results in a film that is softer, more welcoming than other films that depict young, gay men coming-of-age. It seems impossible to compare Call Me by Your Name to yesteryear’s Best Picture, Moonlight, or even the more recent, Beach Rats; though they all may be simplistically reduced to the same genre. Elio does not encounter any opposition to his relationship with Oliver other than the values that he has internalized. Although same sex relationships were still largely forbidden in 1983, even those views seem muted as if the summer has allowed even reality to slip away with the flowing sunshine. Perhaps some will point to the lack of traditional, physical turmoil and see a drawback. However, it allows the movie to focus, instead, on deepening the relationship between Elio and Oliver, which it does with great success. Chalamet plays Elio’s yearning with a deep understanding, resulting in final scenes that are all the more devastating. His complex performance is complemented by Hammer’s perfectly.


In addition to the two young men at the center, Elio’s parents (Michael Stuhlbarg and Amira Casar) bring a much needed contrast of experience and weariness. Time has already changed them irreparably. However, this feeling of being passed by is not expressed as cynicism or bitterness, but in support and hope for their son. Even time is not treated as an enemy, something to be raced against or contested. Life happens as a steady march forward and we simply change along with it. Elio and Oliver’s affectionate switching of names, the source of the movie’s title, is an acknowledgement of each other even as they are becoming other people. Perhaps we cannot remain youthful forever, but that promise of transformation, with its beauty and pain, is never lost.

PREVIEW: Bodies of Michigan exhibit

The Bodies of Michigan art exhibit at Palmer Commons features a multitude of artists and their take on how they understand and interact with the human body.  Differing mediums, styles, and contexts convey everything from friendships to phobias.  I’ve personally been really interested in street photography lately, and the fact that this exhibit features photography as well as different styles is really fascinating.  I’m hoping to understand how other artists have chosen to represent their worlds.

It’ll be at the Windows Lounge until Thursday, and I’m excited to see it!  For more information, click here.

My contribution to the exhibit is also featured!