Review–Ching’lish

Thursday evening I attended a screening of a theatrical performance of the play Chinglish by David Henry Hwang. I was interested in checking out this comedic examination of cultural and linguistic barriers between the US and China because I relate to the problem–in my visits to India, I go through a lot of goofy exploits trying to adapt to the different culture. I’m happy to say I enjoyed the play very much. The entire audience was in uproar, laughing at a show full of great performances inspired by a stellar script.

 

This production could not have been possible without support from multiple on-campus departments and groups: the Confucius institute, the Department of Theatre & Drama, The School of Music, Theatre and Dance: Collaborative Student Assembly, The International Institute, The Department of Asian Languages and Cultures, Center of Chinese Studies, MESA/Trotter Multiethnic Student Affairs, Basement Arts.

 

Ching’lish is the story of a small time Cleveland businessman trying to weasel his company in as the head of Chinese-English signage translations for major Chinese buildings, but this businessman speaks no Chinese, making negotiation particularly difficult. He relies on a talented translator who helps to avoid some major translation errors. These dialogues are a comedic goldmine. Failing to recognize the importance of enunciation while speaking Chinese, the businessman accidentally makes several lewd comments during his meetings. Fortunately, his translator navigates through these goofy gaffes and business relations start.

 

The acting in throughout the play, but particularly in the comedic scenes, was excellent. The comic timing was spot on, each actor carefully tiptoeing the line between believable and farcical. The protagonist’s role as an earnest businessman in an absurd predicament is both sympathetic and humorous. His translator’s devotion to Chinese culture was clear in the performance–he spoke in flawless, unaccented Chinese. The Chinese developers and politicians embodied the distinct cultural character of the country–I could feel a cultural difference between American and Chinese business tactics through body language alone.

 

I think the performances were so successful in large part because of great writing. The writing centers around idea of communication gap due to linguistic and cultural barriers. The story’s dramatic problem relates directly to its theme–you have two parties who want to start a business translating each other’s languages. In order for them to start this business, they need to translate each other’s language successfully. The stakes of every scene are compelling for this very reason–if translation in a single business deal goes awry, it is a bad omen for the businessman’s long term goals. Moreover, the source of tension is also the source of comedy–this is a comedy of communication error. A common pitfall in writing humor is succumbing to gags over plot and character development. Hwang avoids this pitfall with his clever subject matter–the more ridiculous a scene, the more characters are growing as they learn to avoid repeating their mistakes.

 

I believe treading the line between comedy and drama serves to enrich as much as entertain. The first step towards problem solving can only begin when we stop running away from the problem and start to face it. Humor is a good coping mechanism for reason, as it exposes flaws while keeping things light.

Watch and maybe even contribute to this show.

kickstarter/preview video

A short excerpt from a scene.

Review: Stamps Series Presents Joseph Keckler in “I, as an Opera”

The Michigan Theater hosts a Penny Stamps Lecture Series every Thursday at 5:10pm, open to the public. This past Thursday, the series replaced the lecture with a performance by Art and Design school alumni Joseph Keckler. Keckler performed segments of “I, as an Opera”, a multimedia opera performance. Keckler’s performance felt particularly personal, he began with a humorous conversational anecdote which served as seamless transition directly into the performance. What followed was a kaleidoscopic exploration into Keckler’s life, mind, and soul.

I admit I have no prior experience watching opera, but since Thursday I have scoured the internet for more information and feel safe to say Keckler’s presentation was quite original and innovative.

(A quick digression—I’ve never been interested in opera, nor did I ever expect to be, the fact that I have since googled opera speaks volumes about how creative and immersive this performance was.)

TL:DR, “I, as an Opera” is a humorous retelling of a really bad shrooms trip. I can not confirm or deny
On one hand, the tone of the piece was really funny, because the experiences Keckler sang about were so absurd, and hearing about a bad drug experience via opera singing is probably something I will never get to see again. At the same time, the story was quite disturbing—at one point Keckler tells about his drug-induced sensation of demonic possession.

I felt the inherently humorous concept of presenting a drug story through the conventions of opera is an incredibly bold idea, one that would probably never work in a traditional operatic performance. This is why Keckler’s unique spin on the opera worked so well. Rather than fill the stage with an elaborate set and a large cast, he used a projector to present a variety of visuals to the audience—a lightshow while talking about the positive aspects of the mushroom experience, a silent reel of his old singing teacher while recounting memories from the past induced by the psychedelics. This unique style both accentuated the personal nature of the narrative and successfully demonstrated the mind-warping nature of the story.

There was one other person on stage for about 5 minutes—a man dressed up as a minotaur near the end. Other than that, Keckler performed on stage alone. The one man show style created an intimate connection between lone performer and audience. Keckler also interacted directly with his projections. The audience saw the most important visual representations of the experience—absolutely no extraneous details. This performance, from start to finish, focused entirely on one man on a lot of drugs, and his disjointed journey through his own mind.

The visual details we did see gave us a greater insight into the psychedelic, introspective nature of the experience. Keckler projected images of strobing, colorful lights to illustrate his warped visions during the experience. Much of his performance also delved into memories of his teenage years, time spent learning singing. During this part of the performance, Keckler exhibited a silent film featuring a talking head of his singing teacher. She broke into a series of tangents about Keckler’s personality and habits. Whether this was her opinion or Keckler’s projection of his self-image is unclear. Regardless, this scene illustrated a psychedelic exploration of the self.

Keckler’s performance was a compelling introduction to opera. His performance focused on subject matter that is relevant and entertaining to today’s youth, but he told his story using an archaic style. This marriage between modern themes and classical storytelling made for a refreshing experience.

Watch Joseph Keckler‘s video short based on the opera here

PREVIEW: “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” at the Michigan Theater

Ni!

As King of the Britons, I order you to see Monty Python and the Holy Grail tonight at 7 PM at the Michigan Theater.

Remember: You don’t vote for kings.

You’ll learn a few things, such as the ASB velocity of an unladen swallow (African or European? I don’t know that!), how to identify a witch, or how to stop an English invasion. You have to know these things when you’re a king, you know.

Make sure you get your tickets, or I shall say “Ni!” to you again.

Note: This is a Passport to the Arts event! If you show your Passport, the event is free!

BONUS: How I Became King


REVIEW: GROOVE

GROOVE

On Friday night, the student group Groove put on an energetic, fast paced performance in the Michigan Theater. The bi-annual event has a different theme each year and this season the subtitle was “Innocent Until Groovin’ Guilty.” The evening opened with a spoof film of a criminal case in which Groove members were prosecuted for making too much noise. The convicts were detained in a cell and when they were finally freed, they sprang forth from the silver screen onto the stage and began drumming with spirit. Using non-traditional instruments, such as garbage cans, bicycles, ladders, umbrellas, newspaper, and more, the show turned regular objects on their heads and made them entertaining in a whole new way. The performers also demonstrated their talent with traditional instruments, like guitar, drum set, electric violin, and keyboard. Each scene told a story using a variety of wild costumes and lots of bold singing and acting. One of the funniest sketches was a rap battle between two sections of a middle school band in which the lyrics spoofed off of popular rap songs but using lyrics associated with pre-pubescence and the terrible awkwardness of middle school. Another memorable sketch was a play on the James Bond theme, where some Groove members were taken hostage while others came to the rescue, all the while hammering away a beat.

The audience was totally packed and seemed to love every second of the show. It takes a lot for a student group to pack a full house at the Michigan Theater!  Some fans were also there to support to opening acts, EnCore and Rhythm student dance groups, as well as interluding musicians James Cornelison and Julian Allen.  The exciting evening concluded with a sentimental- albeit comedic- farewell to the senior Groovers as well as an audience shout out from a large sum of Groove alumni who had returned to Ann Arbor for the special event. It was a totally energetic evening, full of comedy, musical talent, and pure entertainment.


PREVIEW: UMMA’s 24-Hour Art21 Screening

UMMA’s 24-Hour Art21 Screening

If you find yourself at the UGLI this Staurday night, studying into the wee hours of the morn and, nearing dawn you need a study break, never fear! Entertainment is on the way. UMMA and the UGLI are teaming up to present a 24-hour marathon screening of Art21. PBS’s series features one hour pieces on famous twentieth century contemporary artists. The episodes to be aired this weekend will include celebrated  names such as Kara WalkerAi Weiwei, El Anatsui, Cindy ShermanMatthew Barney, Barry McGee, Laurie AndersonMarina AbramovićJeff KoonsJohn Baldessari, and many more (ninety, to be exact, because this event honors 100 working artists). The series invites viewers into the studios, homes, galleries, and creative spaces of these pioneering stylists. This behind-the-scenes look is inspiring to artist types and others alike.  So whether you intend to be at the library this weekend or not, you will certainly have something enjoyable to do!

For more information on Art21, click here. The Facebook event and the UMMA’s student blog The Annex will also tell you everything you need to know about the screening. See you there!

REVIEW: Ann Arbor Film Fest Award Screening

Ann Arbor Film Fest Award Screening

On Sunday night, the Ann Arbor Film Fest holds a closing screening of the year’s award winning short films. I sat in for part one of the two part award show and saw a variety of films that took home impressive titles for this year. The evening opened with a short film made by – no artist in competition- but by audience members themselves. Over the course of the Festival, a dry erase board in the lobby captured the doodles and scribbles of patrons of the films. The final collection of drawings was compiled into a stop motion film and was presented as a prelude to the award winners. It was so gratifying to see audience work transform into something experimental and avante-garde over one week of time.

The sequence of winning pieces  included about 10 films from a variety of genres. Stills from my favorites of the collection are featured above. “Split Ends, I feel Wonderful” was a montage of vintage footage of women and men in hair salons getting cornrows. The shots  was overlain with the bourgeois accent of a man commenting on the coif and the culture that so often sports it. The short film carried obvious, but gentle, socio-political commentary.  The second film, which was my favorite of the whole competition, was called “Dad’s Stick.” The British filmmaker made a portrait of his late father, using a slide show of colored panels and a few of his personal belongings beneath short text that described the relationship between each item. It was a very touching film- surprisingly so- given how simple it was; I felt I knew the father so well after seeing only a few of his things. The final film of my top three favorites was one I had already seen at the animated short film screening. It was called “Bite of the Tail.” It told the story of a troubled marriage that was strained by the wife’s mysterious health problems and her husband’s obsession with hunting for snakes in an empty city lot. The narrative was very unusual and the animation was so human that it was captivating to watch.

While these three films were intriguing to me, most fell flat in my opinion. They were too experimental to be accessible; too epileptic and flashy to be pleasant to watch. I noticed a thread of commentary about film- the actual medium- by simulating VCR videos with digital recording devices. I adore the film fest so I was happy to see what this year brought, but I didn’t walk away feeling particularly fond of the selections. Perhaps I just don’t know enough about experimental film. maybe I need to study up before I go back for more screenings next year.