REVIEW: Romeo and Juliet

In their new studio production, the Department of Musical Theatre presents William Shakespeare’s most well known tragedy Romeo and Juliet. Set in Verona, the play follows Romeo and Juliet, two young lovers from feuding families. Through a serious of rash actions and unfortunate misunderstandings, the lovers’ lives come to a tragic end, which ultimately reconciles the two families.

Performed in the intimate Arthur Miller Theatre with a minimal set, almost no props, and very basic costumes, this was an interesting production that seemed to want to focus on the raw emotion and drama in the play. The simplicity of the production worked well in that in allowed the audience to engage with the language of the play and the portrayals of the characters. However, it also caused some aspects of the performance to feel out of place, and sometimes a bit awkward, such as the use of physical swords in the final scenes since swords were not otherwise used in the production.

Another interesting aspect of the production was the casting choices. This production had actors playing roles of the opposite gender, with females playing the traditionally male roles of Mercutio, Benvolio, and the Friar, as well as a male playing the role of Juliet’s nurse. While this was sometimes confusing, especially at the beginning, it ultimately worked well, and brought out aspects of the characters that may not always be seen. In addition, the use of the cast within the production was also an interesting choice. While it is normal to have parts doubled, this production used the entire cast as the chorus. While it was nice that everyone was included, having all of the actors run on stage in the dark and crouch under a bright light while speaking in monotone unison was ultimately off-putting.

Although most of the cast performed well, one of the best aspects of the performance was Cameron Jones’ exuberant and sassy, but always caring, portrayal of Juliet’s nurse. Although not one of the lead roles, Jones shined in every scene he was in, captured the audience’s attention and affection, and brought humor and lightness to an otherwise emotionally tense and tragic play. As he strutted across the stage in his long black dress and apron wittily addressing other characters, he fully engaged the audience who laughed, smiled, and applauded all of his scenes.

Overall, this was a somewhat unusual production that had some great moments. While there was some awkwardness, the minimalistic set and costumes highlighted the emotions in the play and allowed the focus to be more on the actors and the scenes they were creating.

PREVIEW: Romeo and Juliet

 

WHO: The Department of Musical Theatre

WHAT: William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet

WHERE: Arthur Miller Theatre

WHEN: February 20-23

COST: $10 for students

Shakespeare’s most famous tragedy tells the story of Romeo and Juliet, a couple of young star-crossed lovers from feuding families. As they try to be together, a series of unfortunate events and misunderstandings ultimately lead to their deaths.

Review: Neither Mad Nor Sad

This weekend I went to the Rude Mechanicals’ production of Hamlet at the Mendelssohn Theater. I love seeing Shakespeare performed live. It gets so much funnier and more emotional. Reading his plays, I always get lost. All the names are similar and there are no faces to match them to. But on stage! Everything comes to life. Every character has wit and style. Even the words seem clearer. I just love it. Last year I saw the Shakespeare Globe Theater here at UofM and couldn’t stop smiling through the whole thing.

Another thing I like about seeing Shakespeare is seeing what the director added. In this version of Hamlet, there was supposed to be a Mad Men theme, and there was, sort of. I feel like it only went into the costumes. Different themes and settings are often added to these plays. For example (though I use it only because it is more accessible than live shows), the Leo DiCaprio version of Romeo and Juliet uses Shakespeare’s words, but in a modern day setting and adding countless technologies to the plot. A long sword becomes a gun (with the brand name Long Sword), a carriage becomes a car, and many lines in the play correspond to the theme. In this aspect, this play didn’t utilize the theme. There was really only one example of it, besides the costumes, which was the use of a condom for a joke. But that’s really all beside the point anyway.

The play was well acted and produced. I think the casting choice for Hamlet was perfect. He was, firstly a great actor and speaker, and secondly he understood what to do with the character. How to make him mad with grief in just the right way. I was a little disappointed in the overall play though. The plot of Hamlet is well known, so I won’t explain it, but we all know it is a tragedy. And though Shakespeare does add a lot of comedy to his tragedies, he does it tastefully and sparingly. This show took comedy to a whole new level. Although it was funny, it took a lot away from the character development and the depth of the play. When Hamlet bests Laertes and accidently kills him, he should not victoriously get on top of him and starting beating him with fists. It’s very comedic, and since it is the most tragic scene in the play… it was strange.

Overall though, I really enjoyed it. I would definitely recommend seeing it. It’s great to see these students working so hard to put together something like this. And it gives them a great opportunity, one that I truly miss, of being on stage. I know that these actors absolutely loved the drama that the play allowed them to create. There is one more show, and it is today at 2pm. So Sunday, 06 November 2011 at 2pm. Only $3 for students!

Sending you love and light (and luck for the piles of homework we all have),

Danny Fob