Will Eisner famously used the term sequential art to describe comics. But isn’t film also sequential? Scott McCloud talks about how film is similar if you look at the film itself, and not when it is projected and played. Film is just a series of images, a comic in slow motion if you will. McCloud notes that the difference between comics and film is the way in which individual images are juxtaposed. The comic is far more voluntary than film is. You are forced to see frame after frame while watching film but with a comic, your eyes can wander. But more importantly, with film, the way in which the images are juxtaposed with one another is through time, the chronology of the images as they get projected onto the screen, one after the other. However, with comics, it is space that juxtaposes one panel with the next.

Did you ever wonder if there was a term for the tiny margin of empty space between panels? No? Well I am going to tell you anyways. It is called the gutter. Not the most appealing name for such an important aspect of comics.

But why am I telling you all this? Why am I stressing the importance of space in comics? Well that is because I ran into one this summer that utilized it in a way that I had never seen before.

Asterios Polyp is a comic written and drawn by David Mazzucchelli. Basically it is a coming of age story about a famed fifty-year-old architect named Asterios Polyp as he seeks self-discovery. To me, it is so very important that he is an architect. Now there are many things to talk about when considering this comic. It’s dense, both in its written content and its visuals. But I want to focus on one mechanic the comic uses over and over again.

At the beginning of each “chapter”, if you will, is not the name of a chapter, but a single  panel that is directly in the center of the page. What is so special about this panel is that, first of all, it is not sequential, and second, the content within the panel is itself isolated elements. Let me provide an example of when this is used.

The very first page, we see inside the lone panel, raindrops – individual raindrops. From this we can assume that it is either raining, or we are possibly looking at drops of water on a window. In a way, the specificity of the image itself is defeated by the fact that it resides in a panel that is isolated from any other visuals. But that is not entirely true, for you can never forget about the white space that surrounds the panel. May I remind you, when you only have one panel on a page, there is a lot of white space. But all that space is directionless and aimless. But Mazzucchelli provides direction in the next page.

We then turn the page over and we see two panels now. One shows the raincloud that is precipitating, then the next one shows that it is raining on a city. We get even more context on the next page where we see a lightning bolt crash to the city below from the rainclouds perspective. Basically, Mazzucchelli keeps zeroing in on the subject at hand, page by page, till we realize that the lightning bolt hit Asterios’ apartment causing it to catch on fire. In the span of six pages, we go from the isolated specificity of the raindrops to the contextual specificity stating that this is where Asterios Polyp lives.

What I think is so genius about the use of that very first panel is that it shows how space can operate at a fundamental level. An element can occupy one space in a vacuum but the next page expands our understanding of that very space by showing how even the most isolated of elements are a part of a greater picture, a greater space.

In the next chapter, Mazzucchelli uses this to show a well-groomed Asterios with a cigarette then proceeds to show the sad, unshaven, and wet face of Asterios right after his apartment caught fire. He uses this over and over again. How fitting for a story about an architect. One that can design all these empty buildings while he himself has nobody to share his space with.
Mazzucchelli uses it once to show a grid of apples that are all drawn differently, only to go to the next page to show various people that are drawn differently, with the narration saying, “What if reality (as perceived) were simply an extension of the self?” This is one of my favorites.

We are all a part of a shared space and whenever we consider something as an exception to this, it becomes inscrutable or more importantly, not what it actually is – completely mutable based upon our own interpretive means. Which, in itself, also alters what the image is talking about, over and over again. For as much as we may convince ourselves of one meaning, we recognize that an isolated image invites countless interpretations. We get lost within our own mind. But when we recognize that there are others within the space with us, we find direction and a sense that our solutions are taking us somewhere, not leaving us stuck in the cyclical nature of an isolated mind.

The manga starts with Edward questioning what went wrong, calling out for his seemingly missing little brother, yelling that it wasn’t supposed to be like this, and we see that he is missing his left leg. A disembodied text says, “Teachings that do not speak of pain have no meaning…because humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return.”

This scene is the consequence of an action that we have yet to find out. But it is nonetheless gruesome and shocking and raises many questions. First time readers may be wondering about the part of a circle they see Edward’s hands resting on. What is going on?

Hiromu Arakawa, the creator of the manga series does not answer this right away. Instead, the very next panel you see is an objective view of an alleyway in a city, with again, a disembodied voice, but this time, it is preaching about the Sun God Leto and how through prayer and faith, salvation can be achieved. But how does worship compare to what was said on the very first page? It is puzzling to think about, when I have faith in a religion; I gain comfort, an existential shoulder to lean on. So by giving trust, I am allowed to…trust? Arakawa’s refusal to answer the questions raised by the first page right away also suggest that after the consequences depicted in the first page, everything has moved on, presumably, even Edward.
All actions have consequences – action and reaction. While reading Fullmetal Alchemist, it is hard to ignore this fundamental balance that exists in all universes, whether our own or one that is created through fiction. But can we relinquish said consequences? And if we can, how do we do so?

This is where the first volume, no, the first arc of Fullmetal Alchemist really shines. It is brilliantly efficient at creating the characters through which Arakawa will try to answer these questions.

Let’s look at Edward. After the first page, through the duration of the first arc, we get his motivations, history, ideology, his pride, his humor, everything. We find out that his brother, Alphonse, is indeed alive, but exists in an empty suit of armor, we see how much he hates being called short, and we see his skepticism for religion. Yet he states that he and his brother have paid the price for stepping on God’s domain. Edward is undoubtedly full of pride, which is further demonstrated in simple moments like when he introduces himself and Alphonse as being the famous Elric brothers while Alphonse just says that they are alchemists. Alphonse, being an empty suit of armor, is literally a disembodied voice but his is one that is slowly learning, and one that is not professing a self-declared truth.

The state of their bodies is revealed at such a genius moment – when they are fighting for the first time. Edward doesn’t go around showing everyone his prosthetic limbs. Nor does Alphonse take off his helmet and show everyone that there is nobody inside. Instead, only when a chimera lunges at Edward and tries to eat him, does he actually use the metal limb to defend himself.

At the end of the arc, Rose, a girl who was faithful to the Sun God, now finds herself directionless as Edward has revealed to people that the priest was a sham. Edward tells her, coldly, that she needs to move on, that she has a fine pair of legs so she should use them. These two brothers understand the consequences of their past actions. But more importantly, they have moved on.

Let me talk briefly about the next arc, which focuses on a mining town that is under the corrupt rule of a military officer. In the first arc, Edward and Alphonse dismantled a corrupt religious regime but now they must handle a different type of organization. But this is different, whereas the dismantling of the church of Leto caused many people to now exist in a directionless limbo, here, when the Elric brothers save the town, the power is returned back to the miners. It shows, that the Elric brothers truly do stand for justice but it also presents a situation where the results of their actions are perhaps more favorable. As we find out later in the series, the loss of the church of Leto causes that country to fall into war. Every action has consequences, even if you think your actions are just.

The second arc also reveals that the very military that Edward plans to join is corrupt as well. A plot point that is further explored in the last arc in the volume which showcases a train heist that is led by military deserters who have now resorted to terrorism in order to dismantle what they believe is a corrupt military body. It is also by the end of this arc that we are finally introduce to Roy Mustang, who ends the volume by literally creating an explosion out of thin air on the train platform, sending the charging terrorist leader flying away. He also introduces himself as the Flame Alchemist, telling the terrorist to never forget it. You can already tell that there may already be one too many huge egos in this story – cough cough, Edward.

This is only the first volume, so I say with confidence that Fullmetal Alchemist is easily one of the most efficient and complete stories that I have ever read. And when I say that, I am including all storytelling mediums.
I would like to draw more parallels to elements that appear later on in the manga, but I will bow out here so as not to spoil anything. Granted, this series and anime series (I am talking about Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood because that is much more faithful to the original manga series) has been out long enough for the whole spoiler warning rule to be null and void, I will still digress.

This is a manga that is smart, expertly told, filled with compelling characters, while being fun, and never forgetting that it is a manga. I cannot recommend this series enough to those who are still ignorant to the genius of Hiromu Arakawa.

Last Friday, the Michigan Daily hosted a ‘Story Slam.’ Students, both Daily writers and non-Daily students, submitted their poems, stories, and essays beforehand, and a dozen were able to share their pieces in front of a newsroom full of people. It was the first ever Daily Story Slam, but it was a definite success.

I’ve always loved hearing the random stories of people I barely know. There’s something fascinating about hearing a brief anecdote from a stranger that you’ll probably never really become friends with. It’s the same kind of fascination I get from reading the short ‘Humans of New York’ posts. Every stranger has a rich life of their own that I’ll never know about, but sometimes hearing just a little can make them feel real.

Most of my favorite stories at the Story Slam had a similar tone: wistful and light, with some laughs along the way, but with a strong emotional center. Sam, a guy I remembered from middle school, shared his story about not being traditionally masculine and sucking at sports, but it ended on a note of simple joy as his friend taught him to throw a football. Michael, a very short guy from the Daily, read an essay about how he’d never minded being short despite society’s insistence that it was a shameful thing. And Will shared a story about his late grandfather, who he’d always felt bad about never being close with. He eventually came to realize, though, that since he was close with his own father, he had more than enough paternal love in his life.

Also surprisingly heartwarming was the story of a girl who found out that her frequent friend with benefits, Alex, was gay. She’d brought Alex to the Story Slam, and as she read about him, it was hilarious to see him laughing and blushing. At the story’s conclusion, she walked back to their spot and hugged him tightly. It was so sweet.

There were serious stories. One girl, an editor of the Daily’s great Michigan in Color, shared some of the societal disadvantages being a black woman, and one guy shared a poem about the young black male’s fear of the police. These were strong, too, and in many ways, they’re the stories that are most important for society to hear. In fact, the story that won the prize at the end of the night was about a girl whose friend was killed in a car accident right after high school graduation.

My friend Matt leaned over to me and commented that it’d been his least favorite story of the night, and I agreed. There was something pretentious about how she began; she prefaced her story with a long intro explaining that it wasn’t going to make us laugh or teach us anything. It was real, and it happened to her, and it sucked, and she would never get over it. It was like the girl wanted to convey this image of herself as the blunt, honest girl who took no shit and didn’t try to milk simplistic lessons out of her own experiences. But really, as personal as the story was, what made it inherently ‘more honest’ than Derek’s rambling tale of accidentally being stabbed with an EpiPen?

I think that I might’ve still liked the story the least even if it hadn’t contained those off-putting elements, though. For me personally, no racially charged tirade, no tragic story of loss (as important as it may be) will carry the same simple power as the wistful anecdote, the story that lures you in with self-deprecating jokes and surprises you with its emotional candor. That’s what I came to Story Slam for, and I left more than satisfied.

Last week, I wrote an article praising the show Pushing Daisies. Since I wasn’t able to go into too great depth and since I’m rewatching the show anyways; I figured I could turn it into a series of articles. So every week, I will be watching an episode of Pushing Daisies and reviewing it for the blog. This week is the pilot, “Pie-Lette”. (Clever, right?)

*Spoilers*

Summary:

Since this is the pilot, most of the time of the episode is spent on universe building and exposition. It opens with an explanation of Ned’s (The Piemaker) powers. Ned first learns of his power, at age 9, when his dog, Digby, is hit by car. With one touch, Digby is back to life. He later learns the price of his gift when his mother dies of an aneurysm while baking pies. He brings her back to life and a minute later, his neighbor dies in her place. Unfortunately, this isn’t any neighbor, this is his childhood sweetheart’s, Charlotte “Chuck” Charles, father. More tragedy strikes, though, when his mother tucks him into bed and gives him a kiss on the forehead. This second touch kills her and Ned is no longer able to bring her back to life. After this incident, Ned gets placed into a boarding school and Chuck moves in with her aunts. their separation marked with Ned’s first kiss.

We then fast forward to Ned’s adulthood, where he is the owner and head baker of the Pie Hole, a pie bakery where he brings rotten fruit back to life and uses them for pie filling. Here, we are also introduced to Emerson Codd and Olive Snook. Emerson Codd is a private detective who learns of Ned’s power after he sees Ned accidentally bring back a thief he was chasing. Emerson decides to bring Ned into his business as it is much easier to solve crimes if you can speak to the victim. Olive Snook is a waitress and only other worker at the Pie Hole. She is in love with Ned, but can’t bring herself to make a move.

After our introductions, we see Ned and Emerson in action as they solve a murder. Immediately after, Ned learns of the death of sweetheart Chuck after she was suffocated to death on a cruise ship. This becomes their new case. They meet the thieving funeral director and enter the room that Chuck’s body lies in. After Ned wakes her and find out all he can, he comes to find that he can not touch her a second time and the funeral director dies in her place.

Ned and Chuck head back to Pie Hole and she learns of the new rules of her life, including not being able to touch Ned, not being able to see her aunts, and having to use a pseudonym in public. Chuck becomes disturbed by her new celebrity through her death, but also comes to learn of the $50,000 reward for her killer. This is her first step into the murder-solving business and becoming Emerson and Ned’s new business partner.

With this new partnership, Chuck shares the information that she was only able to pay for the cruise ship by agreeing to smuggle two monkey statuettes in her luggage. When they cross paths with the travel agent that Chuck smuggled for, they find her dead, but bringing her back to life proves futile as she prematurely touches Ned’s cheek and dies again. This leads the detectives to Chuck’s aunt’s house as her luggage (with the monkeys) was sent to her next-of-kin. This is where we are introduced to the aunts for the first time and learn of their history as famous synchronized swimmers, known as The Darling Mermaid Darlings. The murderer knows of the luggage as well and finds Chuck’s aunt, Lily, with the (empty) suitcase after he sneaks into the upstairs. Meanwhile, Ned is busy talking with the other aunt, Vivien, and Chuck attempts to sneak into and out of the house with the monkeys. This all comes to head as Ned heads upstairs, finds the killer, and a seemingly dead Lily. Ned is saved as Lily springs up with a shotgun and takes out the killer.

Pros:

– Everything in this episode is beautiful. The universe is bright and colorful and the settings are amazingly unique.

– The storytelling is engaging and the exposition dumps are enjoyable as it follows the rule of “show don’t tell”.

– The humor still works after multiple viewings.

– The characters are incredibly interesting and their interactions feel natural while also being fun to watch.

Cons:

– This is clearly a pilot that was made to convince producers of the marketability, not made for the television.

– This episode is largely expositional, so it can be dragging to watch if you’re not engaged by the nature of the show.

– This episode does create some small, inconsequential plot holes since this episode was not necessarily created for TV.

– The introductions to characters seem rushed. It would’ve been nice to make the show into a two-parter and only introduced Chuck at the end of the first part. This would have allowed us to better understand the relationships between Ned, Emerson, and Olive.

Overall:

While this episode is great and a wonderful introduction to the series, it does have many problems that make it less than perfect. This mostly comes from the previously mentioned fact that this is clearly a pilot that was created to convince producers. If you do not know, often a show will be asked to create a pilot that will be viewed by producers. From this pilot, they judge if they want to put the show on the network. Often times, this pilot becomes the first episode of the series. This damages the episode as Bryan Fuller had to explain too much of the universe’s rules in under half-an-hour. In addition to this, Fuller tried to create a completely self-contained narrative in the single episode, which only separates it from the rest of the series and creates plot holes. While this episode is great, it cannot be considered one of the best of the series.

Rating:

7/10 Daisies