Category: Theatre

REVIEW: For the Love of (Or, the Roller Derby Play)

Maeve Ricks Leave a comment

As I settled into my seat at the Arthur Miller Theatre, little did I know that I was about to be whisked away into the adrenaline-pumping world of roller derby, a world I had never explored before. Enter the Rude Mechanicals and their electrifying production of For the Love of (or, the Roller Derby Play), which proved to be a dazzling spectacle that captivated from start to finish.

The Rude Mechanicals team assembled a seamless fusion of sets, costumes, hair, and lighting, each working harmoniously to transport this newbie into the vibrant, gritty world of roller derby. The dazzling costumes and imaginative set design were like characters themselves, imbued with the essence of the sport and its audacious players. 

And then there was the derby choreography, wow! The energetic sequences dazzled with their exhilarating pace, brilliantly captured the sport’s chaos and thrill while presumably being far safer than the real thing. The cast flew around the stage with infectious energy and precision, making the audience feel as if we’d dropped into a match on the fast track. 

Before the show, audience members were given team flags, stirring up competitive spirit and encouraging us to root for our favorite characters, which is a thrilling addition. This electrified the atmosphere, resulting in a lively yet respectful crowd. Imagine an audience fully engaged, mouths agape, eyes wide, and hearts pounding, not because of a stray Instagram scroll, but because the performance demanded it. 

However, every fierce jam (that’s a roller derby term I learned) has its slip-up, and here, the plot’s initial momentum veers off course. The script begins as a captivating ensemble piece, weaving the members’ stories like a taut team flag. Yet, it falters towards the end of act one, turning towards a singular storyline with a sapphic love triangle. This divulgence from the derby isn’t necessarily bad because sapphic love isn’t relevant to the story, but it dilutes the broader message of empowerment and unity within roller derby, which is what the story initially offers as you get to know the characters in the first act.

Despite this narrative detour, the cast delivered stellar performances. The actresses portraying Lizzie Lightning, Sophia Santos Ufkes, and Andrea the Vagiant, Sarah Josephina Hartmus, stood out, their portrayals embodying fierce athleticism and vulnerable emotion that provided nuanced reflections of the roller derby spirit, and their complicated characters. 

For the Love of (or, the Roller Derby Play) invited me into the intense, enthralling world of roller derby with Rude Mechanicals at the helm—definitely a production to be experienced. While I left with a major issue with the script, the overall excellence of the production remains undeniable. No matter the jam, in the rink, you’ll find your way through.

REVIEW: Our Oz

Maeve Ricks Leave a comment

When whispers of a new, boldly reimagined Our Oz started swirling around campus, I braced myself for the worst. Yet, much to my surprise, the production served up an experience that settled comfortably into the realm of average. Not horrible, not good, just a mixed bag of theatrical intrigue and hasty storytelling, leaving me more intrigued by what it could become than what it was at the moment.

Our Oz ambitiously sets out to explore the beloved tale of Dorothy and co. through a BIPOC and Queer lens, drawing inspiration from “The Wizard of Oz,” “The Wiz,” and even “Our Town.” It’s a potent concept that developed through a devising process between students and faculty, but it’s a concept that suffers from a script that was, frankly, as smooth as Toto’s sudden speaking role (which is to say not smooth whatsoever.) The story unfolded at a speed comparable to a twister through Kansas; this whirlwind pace left little room to develop its characters or embody the timely nuances it aimed for. But, hey, at least I got home early since there was no intermission.

Let’s talk about Toto because, apparently, he’s the narrator now, and an omniscient one with a surprising penchant for clunky, preachy lines that often feel like being hit over the head with a moral textbook. As a character, Toto had energy, but the writing left him scrambling to seamlessly bridge the tale. Remember, show, don’t tell, right?

Thankfully, the production did boast some shining elements. The projection and set design stood out magnificently; videography merged with live theatre in a way that felt fresh and immersive. Scenic Designer, Jungah Han, transformed the stage with a modern yellow brick road, inviting audiences into an Oz that brimmed with modernity and innovation (a promise the script itself couldn’t quite live up to.)

The actors certainly gave it their all. The actor’s playing the four main friends (Dorothy, Scarecrow, Tin Woman, and the Lion) infused their roles with spirit and charisma, managing to breathe warmth and humor into a sometimes uneven narrative. The Lion, played by Jonas Annear, was especially heartwarming with their karaoke songs and dynamic performance, successfully playing timid and fierce throughout the show.

Overall, Our Oz is one of those productions you’re glad to have seen, if only to say you’ve experienced it. The show indeed requires some fine-tuning, perhaps a slower pace and a more refined script could uncover its potential. And who knows, in a few years, after some creative soul-searching and adjustments, I’d consider returning for another round, especially if the tickets were free.Here’s to wishing Our Oz a future as vibrant and visionary as the world it endeavors to conjure.

REVIEW: Titanic: The Musical

Maeve Ricks Leave a comment

Titanic: The Musical is a grand undertaking, promising an epic retelling of the historic disaster. And yet, this production found itself navigating turbulent waters and ultimately struggled to stay afloat. While the intent was ambitious, the execution left something to be desired, particularly in its lack of directorial boldness and inventive staging.

As the familiar story unfolded, one hoped to feel the looming dread and gravity of the sinking ship. Instead, the staging remained disappointingly static, failing to capture the urgency and chaos that the storyline demands. Titanic’s narrative should be a rising tide of tension and emotion, and yet it floundered around in shallow waters. A more dynamic approach to the physical space and movement could have transformed the experience into something truly riveting.

Another unfortunate iceberg in the path was the book itself, drowning under the weight of too many characters. The ensemble cast, while talented, had to fight for precious narrative space, leaving audiences adrift, unable to form meaningful connections or investment in their fates. With a plethora of characters vying for attention, the emotional impact of their plight was diluted, resulting in boredom and a noticeable uptick in glowing screens among the audience.

Sound mixing woes further muddled the waters. The orchestra’s impressive performance was marred by inadequate balance, often overwhelming the vocals. This left many lines and lyrics indecipherable, which is an ironic twist considering the music direction by Tyler Driskell managed to harness the beauty of the score so magnificently. Though the ensemble’s voices were heavenly, our ability to understand their words was sunk all the way down to Davy Jones’ locker.

Despite the muddled aspects, standout performances helped keep the ship from sinking entirely. Landon Wouters as Captain Smith, Nile Andah as Harold Bride, and Jason Mulay Koch as Frederick Barrett delivered compelling portrayals. Andah’s and Koch’s telegraph scene in act one, rich with tension and harmony, was a bright spot in the production and everyone’s phones were put away to witness.

While this titanic production (literally and metaphorically) struggled against its own dramaturgical and directorial currents, there were many shining moments for student performers. This production may have sank, but the performers managed to get on a lifeboat and survive. Hopefully, we will witness their talents navigating clearer waters in the future.

REVIEW: Sense & Sensibility: A New Musical

Sappy Leave a comment

From early to mid-March, under the direction of Matt Bogart, The Encore Musical Theatre put on a beautiful production of Paul Gordon’s Sense & Sensibility: A New Musical. The set design was grand and elaborate, making full use of the theater’s space. The costumes featured intricate details that reflected the period’s distinctive clothing, and the acting and soulful singing contributed to an immersive atmosphere. 

Based on the romance novel by Jane Austen, the plot takes place around 1792-1797 and follows two sisters, Elinor andMarianne Dashwood, played by Chelsea Packard and Jessica Grové. After the sudden death of their father, the women of the Dashwood family are forced to leave their home due to inheritance laws and relocate to a more modest property in the country. The sisters grew anxious about their marriage prospects, as women at the time heavily relied on marriage to secure their future. As they struggle to balance romantic desires with practical concerns, the story unfolds with messy relationships and complex emotions.

Because a musical and a novel are different genres, the musical’s pacing was faster, more direct, and exaggerated. While it lacks Austen’s iconic narrative prose, the show boasts an impressive amount of musical numbers with nineteen songs in the first act and twenty-one in the second that all showcase the characters’ personalities and emotional depth more vividly than the novel. As a result, characters with smaller roles in the book were able to have a bigger part in the musical. 

The first musical number that stood out to me was “Lydia,” sung by Colonel Brandon, largely due to the powerful voice of director and actor Matt Bogart, who is also a professor at SMTD. Bogart’s tone and vibrato enhanced the romantic desperation his character conveyed. My favorite songs from Act I, however, were the last three numbers: “Lavender Drops (Reprise),” “Hello,” and “Somewhere in Silence.” “Lavender Drops” and “Somewhere in Silence” were duets between Elinor and Marianne; their voices complimented each other beautifully, reinforcing their sisterly bond for the audience. In contrast, “Hello” is sung by Elinor and her love interest Edward Ferrars (played by Adam Woolsey), which offered insight into their relationship through its thoughtful lyrics. In Act II, I especially loved the humorous lyrics of “Wrong Side of Five and Thirty” sung by Colonel Brandon, which gave his otherwise serious character a more personable and vulnerable side.

Overall, although the tickets were a bit pricey and the commute to the theater was longer than preferred, the high production quality made it well worth it. I enjoyed being able to see a professor perform because I had only seen students perform previously. I’ve always been awed by the students at SMTD, and Bogart’s talent and skill demonstrated how great professors can foster great students. While this wasn’t my favorite musical narratively or musically, it was still a lot of fun to watch.



REVIEW: The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Maeve Ricks Leave a comment

Oh, the thrills of live theater… expectation in the air, anticipation humming, and—oh, what’s that?—a microphone left on backstage, inadvertently picking up the riveting sound of someone’s pre-show snack break. Alas, such was my experience with MUSKET’s winter production of The Hunchback of Notre Dame at the Power Center for Performing Arts. As the house lights dimmed, I was prepared for an epic adventure through the cobblestone streets of 15th-century Paris, guided by the sweeping melodies of a beloved Stephen Schwartz score. What I received instead was a journey paved with glaring sound issues and directorial missteps.

The sound design/mixing was, let’s just say, a unique interpretation of cacophony at its finest. The voices of leading roles were swallowed by the ensemble during featured moments; it was more like they were competing in a vocal tug-of-war where only one side had their microphones turned on. When the sound design is good, you notice nothing; when it’s bad, it’s like nails on a chalkboard. Mics left on at inopportune moments, and mics off when they were supposed to be on was just the beginning of the rest of this epic-length musical.

Then we have the set—a gorgeous, rented fantasy courtesy of Disney itself. Revel in its arches, its gothic allure, the golden bells, and its underwhelming presence because it was scarcely utilized! If I saw one more chorus arc singing center stage and standing still, there’d be hellfire to pay. Not to mention, that every powerful ballad lacked movement, standing on the same bored center stage mark.

The direction, I’m afraid, felt more like a directionless meandering. Lacking dynamism, each scene seemed to wash into the next with a repetitive lull that did no favors for the audience’s attention span or for characters who already struggle to stand out against their major movie counterparts. It’s hard for me to grasp onto characters whose only defining trait is their ability to make me wish the scene transition would happen already.

Despite these misadventures in sound and space, the cast carried the show on their capable shoulders with Esmeralda, played by Abby Lyons, and Quasimodo, played by Max Peluso, shining even through the most challenging acoustic trenches.

In the end, not even the beautiful set could gloss over the production’s glaring flaws, echoing Shakespeare’s timeless observation that “All that glitters is not gold.” Alas, it’s a poignant reminder that the right team can turn straw into gold, but all the gold-rented sets in the world can’t salvage a lackluster vision and poor sound mixing.

For a student theatre organization that is so popular and well-revered, it’s a shame this production can’t stand next to some of their other hits. Here’s hoping future productions can rise above, allowing both story and song to truly soar.

REVIEW: Titanic: The Musical

Sappy Leave a comment

Photos are provided by Peter Smith Photography

From April 17-20 at the Power Center for the Performing Arts, the School of Music, Theatre & Dance gave a hauntingly beautiful performance of Titanic: The Musical. Alongside Twelfth Night, which was performed earlier in the school year, this production was among my favorite shows of the year and served as a powerful conclusion to the 2024-2025 SMTD season. Everything from the dancing, singing, and acting under the direction of André Garner was exceptionally impressive and truly highlighted the tragedy of the Titanic through compelling storytelling.

Though the movie and musical premiered at similar times, the plot of the musical has no connection to the film. Instead, the stage production is based on a book by Peter Stone, with music and lyrics composed by Maury Yeston. Unlike the movie, which focuses on just a few protagonists, the musical captures the story of an entire ensemble of characters, each with unique personalities and socioeconomic backgrounds. The show does an amazing job showcasing the different passengers’ dreams and motivations for boarding the ship. One aspect of the plot I loved was that, despite their differences, many characters share a common thread: a deep love or devotion for another person. This made me feel more connected to the characters and intensified the emotional weight of the story.

There’s so much to praise about this production—the set design consisted of dark metal frames that created an industrial aesthetic contrasting sharply with the grandeur described by the passengers. I also appreciated the thoughtful use of accents, including British, Irish, and American, which reinforced the historical context and helped clarify class distinctions for the audience. 

The key characters that stood out to me were Thomas Andrews, the ship’s builder; Captain Edward J. Smith, a veteran captain who planned for the Titanic to be his final voyage; J. Bruce Ismay, the wealthy villain behind the tragedy; Isidor and Ida Straus, an elderly couple whose loyalty and enduring romance were unforgettable; and Frederick Barrett, a poor yet charismatic worker in the boiler room.

What stood out to me about Andrews (played by Sutton Kaylor), Captain Smith (played by Landon Wouters), and Ismay (played by Drew Perez Harris) was how their character dynamics were shaped by class and power struggles, and how the tension between just these three characters became the driving force behind the tragedy. Their interactions emphasized how the ambition and greed of a few individuals in power can lead to negligence and disaster. This is most powerfully captured in the number “The Blame,” which musically illustrates their anger, helplessness, and unwillingness to take responsibility.

In contrast, what moved me most about Isidor and Ida Straus was how their love transcended the panic and despair of the situation. Their duet in Act II, “Still,” beautifully expressed their unwavering commitment to one another and served as a powerful symbol of selflessness and hope in the face of death.

The number with the most striking choreography was “Barrett’s Song,” in which Barrett (played by Jason Mulay Koch) sings about a letter to his beloved, whom he left behind to work aboard the ship. The staging of this number featured the boiler room workers performing a physically demanding dance, incorporating flips, extended ballet spins, and synchronized movements that mirrored the intensity and labor of their environment. It was both graceful and raw, and it heightened my excitement for the rest of the musical numbers.

However, what left the deepest impression on me was the final number in Act II, “Finale.” In this solemn closing, the survivors deliver spoken lines that recount real historical facts about the Titanic—including the dreadful imagery of victims’ bodies found among the icebergs and their screams echoing in the darkness, details I never could have imagined. The blend of emotional narration and chilling facts made the conclusion both gut-wrenching and unforgettable, leaving me with a heavy heart as I exited the Power Center.

Overall, this heart-wrenching story and visually stunning production was genuinely awe-inspiring. I will always remember the bittersweet beauty of this musical—its fantastic choreography, breathtaking vocals, and vivid retelling of one of the most infamous tragedies in history. It’s a story that highlights both the devastating consequences of human pride and the enduring power of love, making it an emotionally complex and unforgettable theatrical experience.