PREVIEW: Carrie Smith Returns

Carrie Smith, Residential College and UofM alumna is returning to the campus Thursday night! She will be reading from her latest novel, Silent City, in the Benzinger Library at 7:30 pm. Silent City is Smith’s first crime book. Her protagonist, Detective Claire Codella, lands a high profile case and must fight for her life, in more ways than one.

While Smith currently is Senior Vice President, Publisher of Benchmark Education Company in New York, she grew up in 2016-02-17 19.26.31Detroit.  While studying in Ann Arbor she majored in Creative Writing and Literature. It’s fitting that she will read from her most recent work in East Quad, which houses the Residential College (RC), and her former community. I myself am a proud member of the RC. As someone who hopes to work in publishing one day, I can’t wait to meet her. If you like crime fighting, come listen to Carrie Smith’s story and hear from our fellow Wolverine!

 

Review: Nrityopahara

On Tuesday at UMMA’s Helmut Stern Auditorium, Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant performed three pieces of Indian classical dance. The first piece, performed in the bharatanatyam style of dance, was an interpretation of a segment of the life of Rama, an incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu. The second piece, performed in the kuchipudi style of dance, was a scene from the life of Krishna, another incarnation of Vishnu. The third piece, a bharatanatyam performance with influences from other classical dance styles, was a portrayal of nine different emotions: anger, fear, wonder, disgust, fear, compassion, valor, love, and peace. All three dances were set to music incorporating traditional Indian elements, including flute, violin, drums, cymbals, and vocals (in the first two dances, the vocals were prayers or stories corresponding to the dance, and in the third it was simply syllables, analogous to the Western do-re-mi).

Her performance was the first professional Indian classical dance performance I have seen before, and it was simply spectacular. There were two elements in particular that mesmerized me most: her impeccably timed choreography, and her beautiful facial expressions and body language. Her movements coincided precisely with the music: for example, at one point she portrayed a bow being strung and subsequently breaking. To convey this, she stamped her feet four times, corresponding with four percussive beats in the music, perfectly evoking the sound of snapping wood. I have never noticed that kind of parallelism in the bharatanatyam performances I have seen before, and experiencing that connection between the dance and the music brought another dimension to the performance.

Her body language and facial expressions were similarly eye-opening. Bharatanatyam is a very abstract dance and uses hand gestures to symbolize nouns. Though Dr. Jayant explained the story of each piece and demonstrated some of the key hand gestures before she began, her facial expressions were instrumental in my ability to follow the storyline. For example, the first piece involved a scene in which Rama’s father was forced to send Rama and his brother to fight demons—her brokenhearted face was more touching than any other sorrowful scene I’ve ever seen enacted, and made me want to cry. Similarly, the first piece also included a marriage scene, during which she was portraying two characters at once: Rama and his wife Sita. She gracefully shifted from one persona to another, giving Sita demureness and rapture by keeping her eyes lowered and her head turned to one side, while giving Rama confidence and boldness by keeping her back erect and stance tall.

I could not believe how expressive the performance was. During the brief Q&A session after her performance, during which she talked about everything from the amount of time she spends practicing to her opinion on the role of politics in art, I asked her if she had choreographed all three pieces herself, and she told me she had. This explained the perfect alignment of the music and the choreography as well as the accessibility of her body language, and it only made me more awestruck at her thoughtfulness and thorough attention to detail. It was a fantastic performance, and I was simply bedazzled throughout.

REVIEW: Deadpool

(Please note: This review is written in such a manner as to not spoil the film.)

The first superhero movie of the year crashed into theaters this weekend. However, the Marvel/Fox collaboration Deadpool is nothing like its predecessors.

I’m a huge superhero fan. I love everything from the cheesier, lighthearted fare of the Spider-Man films, to the darker, gritter movies Hollywood has primarily been pumping out more recently, such as Captain America: The Winter Soldier. With Deadpool, however, the genre goes where it has never gone before: rated R. And with it comes a film that is bolder, bloodier, more vulgar–and 100% funnier than anything we’ve seen so far.

Starring Ryan Reynolds (Green Lantern) as the Merc with a Mouth, Deadpool essentially combines the irreverent humor of Guardians of the Galaxy with the fourth-wall-smashing of Ant-Man (with its own hefty addition of F-bombs and innuendos). The dialogue is witty and fast-paced, the jokes (and body count) fly, and the characters are lovable not for being good people, but for being unapologetically, outrageously awful (but still, you know, at least better than the antagonists).

It’s clear everyone involved with the project loved and understood it on an innate level. Every detail is polished to a shine, from the ridiculous opening credit sequence to Stan Lee’s perfect cameo (to, well, pretty much everything else). Without a doubt, this was the role Ryan Reynolds was born to play and it’s no wonder this was the first R-rated movie to surpass $100 million domestically in its opening weekend.

Of course, Deadpool‘s not perfect. The plot is so straightforward, it often feels like an afterthought beneath the pileup of comebacks and battles, and the constant back-and-forth of the storytelling style (flashback to present to flashback to present) gets a little tedious after a while. Plus, I’m concerned about the numerous cultural references (which carry many of the quips) growing stale in a few years.

The first two of these problems are minor in the grand scheme of things, though. The film is definitely more a comedy than a thriller, so the fact that the jokes work matters far more than the twisty-ness of the plot. (And they do work, really, really well.)

As for the cultural references becoming dated: Maybe we just need to get a Deadpool 2 in a couple years to make up for that?

Deadpool is in theaters now. Tickets are available for showings at both Goodrich Quality 16 and Ann Arbor 20. Grab them before someone spoils all the punchlines (both literal and metaphorical) for you.

PREVIEW: CAFÉ SHAPIRO

The 19th Annual Café Shapiro Anthology has begun!  As taken from an informational email:

“Café Shapiro is a series of study breaks at the Shapiro Undergraduate Library, featuring undergraduate student writers reading from their own work. Each night different students read. Last year was met with 40+ students reading. A recent Prof quote on his nominations:

‘”I feel like I have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to talented students in my creative writing course this semester…..
I think they will relish the opportunity that Café Shapiro offers.”‘

There are multiple Café Shapiro readings.  They occurred on 2/8, 2/9, 2/15, and the final reading takes place tomorrow.  All readings will be held from 7:00 – 8:30pm in the Shapiro Undergraduate Library-Bert’s Café Lobby area.   Coffee, tea, and cookies will be provided to all listeners (and readers).

I highly encourage you to check it out, as this is a free event and the readers were specially nominated by UMich faculty!

REVIEW: Red Eyed RC Players

Saturday night the RC Players presented “Red Eye”, their 24 hour theater spectacular. During the last 24 hours the members wrote, produced and rehearsed two original shows, so that by 8 pm they were ready to perform.  Well, almost. Due to technical difficulties the show didn’t begin until almost 8:30 pm. Though they played catchy tunes, by the time it started the audience was getting a little restless.

The performance got underway with a piece called “Berning the Matriarchs”. And yes, Bernie Sanders was featured as the kidnapped president. In addition, this show drew on a wide collection of female symbols of American nationality (our matriarchs), as well as a slightly confusing “Batwoman”, to create a play that was against corporations and pro Bernie Sanders. In an almost counterproductive measure the villain of the story was also a woman, who fought against the “matriarchs”. The person who saved the day was a man named Carl; he just wanted to dance and not get pushed around by the mean matriarchs anymore. It was a funny show that incorporated a lot of chicken based puns (which makes since because the villain was a half-chicken woman…I think), political riffs, and elaborate dance moves. While I don’t think the show was as feminist as it was trying to be, as none of the women in the show were characters I could root for, it definitely promoted sexual orientation inclusivity (two of the matriarchs finally admitted they still had feelings for each other), and smashed big businesses, namely KFC.

These seemed to be the common themes of the night. In “Love is a Battleship”, the show consistently put down the Bath and Body Works franchise and ended with two women getting married. The story consisted of an interesting combination of mice and men (this allusion was mentioned in the show) and women. And a cyborg named Boobies. It capitalized on physical humor at moments while also still getting to its message about freedom and acceptance. No character exemplified this more than the Owen Wilson impersonation that just about stole the show. Performed by Sara Head, her Wilson, his daddy issues, and the repeated catchphrase of “woooow” had people rolling in the aisles.

Overall, despite the slow start, it was a fun evening! “Red Eye” continues to show the amazing amount that one can accomplish in just 24 hours and I can’t wait to see what they turn out next semester.

REVIEW: NoViolet Bulawayo Reading

IMAG0663

I’ve learned to take notes during these things because it’s easy to let the experience rush past you and carry you for a little while, but when trying to think of things to write the review about, you can remember nothing but the shivers the author’s voice sent down your spine–you can’t even remember the words. But looking over my notes from this reading, I find that they fall flat in an unexpected way. I enjoyed the reading immensely, but looking back at my notes, looking at things that I wrote down thinking this is it, this is what I like, I find something lacking about them, as if they were random, tangential scrawls with little discernment. Whatever it was that roused my interests during the reading is not there.

I think this has to do with the voice of NoViolet Bulawayo. When she speaks, she speaks knowingly, confidently. Her words fell from her lips heavy and assured, as if the way they would land upon ears was predetermined. It was an enchanting certainty–there was nothing hesitating, nothing nervous about it and that lack of a quaver, that calmness–well, it made her words seem true in a nothing-but-the-truth kind of way.

And that really describes Bulawayo’s work and book We Need New Names: true and truth. She has a way of writing about things that one knows to be true but does not think to be true. The kind of things that you wouldn’t come up with on your own, but when spoken aloud, seem like a truth that has always been lurking in the back of your mind. This was noticeable particularly in the second section she read. That section described Darling (the narrator) in Detroit after her move from Zimbabwe. First, she is sitting there thinking about home and what home means to her different family members–they have many homes, according to her, and even though some of them are the same homes, they all describe them differently. Most of these are “before” and “after” kind of descriptions–descriptions less about the homes themselves and more about the events surrounding them, their occupancy and vacancy. Bulawayo does not describe such things with verbose, complicated language–her voice is simple and straight and sufficient for the task at hand. Later, this section transitions to the phone call Darling’s aunt is making. Her aunt is trying to place an order with Victoria Secret but the woman on the other end of the line is having trouble understanding her accent. Readers are given a taste of the frustration, a sip of the embarrassment and the degradation of being accused of not speaking (or knowing) a language that you can speak, and speak well. The words Bulawayo uses to describe the competency of the aunt’s English are particularly precise: “like it was the only language she has ever known.”

The other two portions of her book she read were equally weaved with simple truths. In the first, she talked of how people came to live in Paradise, the shantytown where Darling and her friends reside. They were desolate, they were desperate, but these were not things explicitly stated–like any good author, Bulawayo brought these words to your head by describing their possessions (or lack thereof), their families, or perhaps their children’s fearful eyes. And for the last part of her reading, Bulawayo read from a scene involving Darling, older now, calling her friend Chipo who was still in Zimbabwe. Darling found out, when she attempted to speak of it, that she no longer has the right to speak of the suffering and the turmoil going on in her home country–she is not there, she left. It is no longer her country, her home.

I highly recommend that everyone pick up a copy of We Need New Names. It is touching, insightful truth.