PREVIEW: The Great Tamer

In the spring of 2017, Dimitris Papaioannou and his ten performers premiered their first display of the breathtaking visual production, The Great Tamer, at the Onassis Cultural Centre in Athens, Greece. Since then, this production has travelled to a multitude of countries in Central Europe and Asia, leaving its viewers in tremendous awe and feeling gravely inspired to exhaust our lives and to give everything we can before leaving this world.

The production encompasses the human condition, revealing the small tragedies and great absurdities of our modern lives through classic theatrical conventions. Papaioannou has chosen to use unique techniques to manipulate simple props, ultimately creating illusions that engage with the material and the metaphysical of life on our current world.

With Ann Arbor, Michigan being one of only two locations that this production is being performed at in the United States, I am anticipating this event highly. I am excited to feel the tragedy and the frivolity that other reviews have promised and to feel enlightened by an orchestrated presentation of the universal emotions common among all of us.

 

PREVIEW: Roma

On January 16 and 17, the Michigan Theater will be screening Roma, a 2018 film directed, produced, co-edited and shot by Alfonso Cuarón. A semi-autobiographical film, Roma details the life of a maid to a middle-class family in Mexico City. The film has received favorable attention from critics, as evidenced by its two Golden Globes and four Critic’s Choice Awards. Be sure to catch a screening of this film on January 16 at 4:00 or 9:25 PM, or January 17 at 7:45 PM. Tickets are $8.50 for students.

REVIEW: Mozarts Birthday Bash

The Concert began on an informative note as the pianist stood in front of the audience and explained the importance of piano concertos.  He compared Mozart’s Piano Concerto No.9 to Beethoven’s third symphony “the Eroica symphony”, in that it changed the way piano concertos are composed like how Beethoven’s Eroica symphony changed the way symphonies are composed. As he explained, the heart of the concerto is the interplay of orchestra and piano, which Mozart brought to new heights. However, Mozart’s concertos go much further because he explored the interplay of all the instruments: the oboe with the horns, the horns with the cello, and even the pianist’s right hand with the pianist’s left hand.

Piano Concerto No.9 is considered by many to be his first masterpiece, which Mozart wrote at the age of 21. This really struck me because I am 21 years old and uhhh nothing needs to be said.

For the Piano Concerto there was a guest conductor because Arie Lipinsky had a pinched nerve. Interestingly, the conductor did not face the pianist, which means he was not conducting the pianist, only the rest of the orchestra. I have never seen this at a classical performance before.  After the piano concerto, the pianist surprised the audience with an encore. The encore was a transcription the pianist made of Leonard Bernstein’s second symphony. It was  a lively piece with the pianinsts hands flying left and right.

For Mozart’s requiem, Arie returned to conduct.  The Ann Arbor symphony orchestra was joined by four professional soloist and five choirs. This made for both a musical and visual feast. Musically, there were over 100 voices on stage, which added to the grandness of the requiem. Visually the different outfits of every singer put together side by side made for a nice picture. I saw tuxedos with red vests,  purple gowns, etc..

My only complaint is regarding the subtitles they had for the requiem.  The requiem is in Latin, but they showed English subtitles on the screen. This is not a good choice because latin words would help the audience follow the singing. Seeing the English translation doesn’t matter because we aren’t following a story or plot where the meaning of the words has any significance.

There is no musical encore for Mozart’s requiem which is so grand and the last piece Mozart wrote on his deathbed. As a substitute encore, they gave every audience member a delicious chocolate truffle at the end.

 

REVIEW: Oliver!

This performance was by the Ann Arbor Civic Theatre.

Oliver is one of my top three favorite musicals in the world, but I am always very nervous when I go to see a performance of Oliver because it stars children. Children are often terrible actors and when they start singing out of tune don’t adjust their voice accordingly for the remainder of the song. Mistakes happen in every performance of Oliver, but the musical is so great that it is easy to ignore them.  This performance by the Ann Arbor Civic Theatre was better than average because the main roles were fantastic.

Fagin is a difficult role because he is supposed to be hilarious. Not just because of his script filled with one-liners, but every awkward mannerism and dance move he makes is supposed to make the audience laugh. Peter Sonnberg who played Fagin accomplished this. Every song I couldn’t take my eyes off Fagin, even if he wasn’t the main singer like in “I’d Do Anything”, because the way he moved was so entertaining. He is like a warm-hearted silly old man who doesn’t realize how goofy he is. When Bill Sikes brought Fagin his bounty of stolen goods for the day, I was laughing out loud, not because of the jokes being said but from Fagin’s lighthearted laugh after every joke.

Oliver’s voice was incredible. Emmanuel Morgan, who played Oliver, should be in a national boys choir. His voice was innocent, pure, and hit every high note with a beautiful falsetto. Oliver’s acting felt unnatural at times and his dancing was choppy, but this actually fit Oliver well who’s personality is supposed to be earnest and naive. The Artful Dodger had a great cockney accent and amazing stage presence. It was easy to see when he was performing with the other kids how much more natural his movements and acting was. Per Bergman who played The Artful Dodger really shone in every choreographed scene. This was important because The Artful Dodger is supposed to be a clever and talented character. Nancy was all around incredible, and perhaps the star of the show because of it.

Now for some complaints. The instrumentals were too quiet. I felt as though the singers were not able to project their voices because the music wouldn’t be able to accompany the volume. Scenes that usually feel intense were missing this intensity because the singing was too soft. For example in the opening song “Food,  Glorious Food” I didn’t think the kids were actually hungry and wanting food, and in “I Shall Scream!” there was no screaming. However, on a positive note the lead violinist did a wonderful job playing the mournful notes.

I also didn’t like Bill Sikes costume. I thought he looked like a vampire with slicked back hair, white faced make-up with dark black eyes, and a black cape over a red vest.

PREVIEW: Carrie Newcomer

This Sunday, January 13, one of my all-time favorite artists will be performing at the Ark in Ann Arbor! Carrie Newcomer is a folk singer-songwriter, as well as a writer, and I have been listening to her for a good portion of my life, having been introduced to her music by my dad. I have seen her in concert once previously, and it was one of my favorite concerts I’ve been to. My family drove to Indiana over my high school spring break to see her perform in a small auditorium at Ball State University, and it did not disappoint.

Described as a “prairie mystic” by the Boston Globe, her music has an intimate spiritual inclination that celebrates human connection. If you have never heard Carrie Newcomer before, check out the video below for a sample!

Tickets are general admission and can be purchased online for $20 through 11 am on Saturday, January 12. After that, they may be purchased at the door on the night of the show. The show begins at 7:30 pm and doors open at 7 pm. The Ark is located at 316 S Main St in Ann Arbor.

REVIEW: Vox Lux

Some movies just leave you wondering: “Why?” That is all I remember thinking as I exited the theater following the film Vox Lux. Never has anything, not even my final exams, left me with such a general air of confusion. And most bewildering of all, it might have been intentional!

Vox Lux stars Natalie Portman as Celeste, an aging pop star. But even that might have been a sort of false advertising. For the film begins when Celeste is still a teenager, portrayed by Raffey Cassidy. Her career begins then, under the shadow of an enormous tragedy, a school shooting. Perhaps, it was the depiction of that tragedy that decisively turned me against the film. It was senseless and horrifying. Worst, it felt as if the movie was exploiting the chilling nature of the event to send a message. Whatever that message, I was certainly not ready to hear it, much less understand it.

This certainly obscured one of the best parts of the film, which was Cassidy’s performance as young Celeste. I was always left wondering what she was thinking. Alternatively, she acted her age and then well beyond her years. Contributing to this, was her odd demeanor, calm when she should be tense, prepared when she should be caught off guard. Celeste was a constant enigma that never ceased to intrigue me, at least when Cassidy was playing her.

Perhaps the greatest disappointment, then, was Natalie Portman’s performance. Whatever subtlety was created in the first few acts of the movie was completely lost by these last few parts. In fact, there seemed to be little connection between the two, which contributed to the overall lack of cohesiveness in the film. This adult Celeste has been jaded by years of public performance and has, at least outwardly, left the past behind. She is always looking to cover up her messes and make everyone as forgetful as she is. This is the philosophy that the film espouses best. The film, itself, wants to move as quickly as possible. It blurs everything together into a hyperactive montage of images. When there is so much information, none of it will matter.

It is a cynical stance that this film takes. But it is a cynicism about the 21st century that means nothing because we are no longer invested in any of the characters nor the world they inhabit. We don’t know what they want because they strive for nothing. We don’t care. Celeste doesn’t care. There is simply no weight in the film at all. Vox Lux is frenetic mess that sprints through scenes but ends up nowhere at all. Maybe that is exactly where it wanted to be?