Brooklyn movie Review

Review

Spoiler Alert:

The synopsis of Brooklyn is relatively simple. A young woman works in the town sundry, general good store.  She seems to be capable and efficient, whereas her employer is insulting to her customers. Later at dinner it is revealed to her mother and sister (though it seems that her sister already knows) that she is to be traveling to America for work. She indicates that her housing is secure as well, and that all of this has been secured by a Priest. Her mother mentions something of her return, yet they all feel that this might not be a possibility. The young girl is very naïve on the ship. Eating and getting food poisoning, only to be later guided by another more experienced passenger. She comes to live in a boarding house with other women, faces homesickness, takes classes, and works. As spring comes she finds adjustment and eventually love. She even marries. Due to a tragedy she has to return to Ireland, and eventually begins to have a double life, and new love. One day when someone says that they know the truth, she reveals to her mother that she must return. And return she does, to her husband.

Over all Brooklyn is great! It is a very honest whole-rest-paced portrayal of a young woman as she navigates the journey to a new country and her first months there. It is very honest when it shows Eilis’ food poisoning on the boat, her initial maladjustment at her job at a shop, her somewhat dowdy attire in her initial arrival in Brooklyn, and her periods of homesickness, nostalgia, and tears.  In the process, as I said in the preview, this film is a visual delight which uses great lighting, costumes and good facial acting to light up the screen, and at times dull dreary Brooklyn.

Pastel picture perfect image

As the story progresses we can see more smiles rather than downcast eyes on Eilis’ facial palette. Her grip on the country is also experienced in the certainty in her tone. But the biggest arena where you see that she has fully blossomed in her new country is evident by the different pastel hues of her costumes. I love the yellow cinched at the waist full skirted chiffon dress she wears as she drops off a letter in the mail box. I love the periwinkle top she wears as the other young ladies teach her to eat pasta.  She is simply a vision.

The problem with this film

I feel like people are going to invent a way to throw tomatoes at me through the internet for even having this subheading.  After all, this movie was named one of the best of the year, nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award, and some have compared it to a beautiful Victorian Novel. It is a beautiful movie. It is heartfelt and honest, and I go to expound on this further. But I just have to say that at times I found that this movie dragged on and on. I am no adrenaline junkie when it comes to movies. However, it just seemed that this movie from her arriving to New York, to her troubled days at work, to crying upon receiving a letter, to just living… seemed to really drag on. Some might say that this is a throwback to neorealism- which showed scenes that nobody really wanted to see.  I like the emotional honesty and honest portrayal of what it is like for someone to adjust in a new country. But, perhaps 3 minutes somewhere along the way could have been shortened.

In addition, I thought that the end had such an anti-climactic ending. Yes, it is heartwarming to see her and her husband embrace and kiss when they rejoin. It is lovely, how the camera freezes on that moment. But, to portray so much of her courting another man , settling in at her sister’s former job, going on and on about her  new life in Ireland, and then before you know it she is in the arms of her husband—it just seemed a bit sudden! Her reunion with her husband should have been a bit lengthened. Or they could have cut down on her time in Ireland where she takes on her old life. That just went on and on…

A Feminist Story

A line that really resonated with me was when someone told Eilis, “Pretty plus you have qualifications, “Which I think is often a University of Michigan or any college educated woman’s dream. To us, this is the idea of having it all.  Many of us are not at the stage of children, a house, and a husband. But to be a confident, pretty woman, with an education is more of the current dream.

If I were to take it one step further I would say that this movie is a feminist one. This is a woman who makes a solo journey, gets a job, takes classes, decides how she feels about someone, decides what she is going to do with her body, etc. And all of this is done before feminism was a real word.

A mystery

The one thing that I was surprised to hear about was that her sister died, or more so how she died. Sometimes as she looked at letters from Eilis she looked a bit of envious. It mostly looked wistful, but with a tinge of envy or lost wondering. I wonder, especially as she could see her sister carve a life for herself, of what would happen with her life. Was she worried about always being the older sister forced to take care of her mother? Was she sad? Did that lead to her death?

We never found out why she died.  A small part of me thought that it was suicide. But after that idea was ruled out, I thought that perhaps her death had to do with more emotional reasons rather than physical.

Throwback to Neorealism

This film is somewhat reminiscent of I Girasoli (the sunflower) directed by Vittorio De Sica and the screenplay written by Cesare Zavattini. They are both behind the nonrealistic classic Bicycle Thief (Or in Italian Bicycle Thieves). In Girasoli, Mastro Mastrianni’s character Antonio loved Sophia Loren’s character Giovanna and even marries her- though he says that he is not the marrying type. Later during World War II he is almost half dead in the snow, when a Russian woman saves him. He eventually marries her. While in Italy Giovanna and her mother-in-law are consumed with worry. One day Giovanna goes to Russia only to find Antonio… married to another with a child.

In this movie, Antonio cannot put his dual identities together: His Italian past, with what Russia and the Russian woman who finds him. He cannot juggle the concept that this woman saved my life, and I owe her, and possibly Russia to a large extension but Italy is my home- I have people who love me there. Of course, we the outsider can say this so easily with an omniscient viewpoint.  We don’t know what the hell war does to people, and how it can not only kill people but put minds asunder.

Immigration and the life before and after coming to a new world- don’t always balance equally in the mind as well. In fact in an Abnormal Psychology textbook I read that schizophrenia happens a lot new immigrants. I cannot remember exactly why, but perhaps this has a lot to do with the balance to different identities and all that they encompass.

Another thing about both movies is that they show rather certain mundane scenes that more formalistic (or shall we say showy) films might not show.  In other words, both have scenes which seem to go on and on, and don’t always show the prettiest of things ( Eilis suffering food poisoning) and the camera panning on Antonio’s Russian home.. It’s mundane and at times not cute.

Honesty we can All Relate to

At times we might think that we have nothing in common with this movie because we are not an immigrant in the 1950s coming to Brooklyn. But we are all going through some sort of growth where we have to go through the not pretty stages of something. But in the end we blossom from it. This film does an excellent job of not being shy of exposing the drudge that can accompany new experiences and growth.

If you want to vicariously live through someone else’s experience, and yet relate it back to your experience of living, then this is the film for you.

Oh one more thing…

Another fun tidbit of this film is that it showcases… Jessica Pare!!!! This is the actress who portrayed Megan Draper in Mad Men. If you are like me and you go and stalk movies (and TV shows) that show former Mad Men cast members- then that just should be all the reason you need to go see this film!

But Mad Men cast spotting aside, truly: Go see this film.

Brooklyn movie Preview

Brooklyn Preview

Wonder what it would be like for a young woman to make a solo journey to America during the 1950s? What her hopes, her fears, and worries might be? Would you like to experience this vicariously?
If so then Brooklyn is the movie for you! It is a visual delight which uses great lighting, costumes and good facial acting to light up the screen, and at times dull dreary Brooklyn (although I would like to think that Brooklyn is at times is a character of the story and as Sarah Jessica Parker said about New York in regards to Sex in the City, it is another character)
This movie is a combination of love story meets coming of age story. At the same time, it shows how at times it can be hard for certain people have two identities/roles to juggle the two, and not let one overtake the other. In this case it is Eilis in a way, has a trickier time juggling her newfound American immigrant identity with that of her Irish soul.
But what this film is even more about is temptation in the context of out of sight out of mind. Let’s just say Eilis somewhat follows the path of Mastro Mastrianni from the movie Girasoli (Sunflower). He was an Italian WWII officer who was lying frozen/almost dead when the Allied troops went into Russia. When he recovers he marries the lovely Russian girl who saves his life. All the while forgetting the woman he is married to in Italy- played by the goddess Sofia Loren. But as I said earlier, Eilis somewhat follows his path- not completely. In order to see what Eilis does, well you just have to go see this movie, won’t you?
Also, if you need another reason to see this- think of her Saoirse Ronan. If you ever wondered what happened to that girl in Atonement- then this movie offers your answer. She blossoms into a bright beauty and brilliant actress. Unlike other child stars (cough…Lindsay Lohan)…
Enough of Lindsay Lohan—go see this movie!

REVIEW: “Les Liaisons Dangereuses”- Intrigue at Michigan Theater

Wednesday night, a fair sized group braved the cold and slippery roads to see National Theater Live’s screening of Les Liaisons Dangereuses. A stunning play in it’s honesty, brutality, moral ambiguity, discussion of sex and pleasure, it creates just as complicating and deep feelings in its audience.

The set for this production, performed within the Donmar Warehouse, perfectly complimented the theater’s space. With an audience on three sides of the stage it created a sense of forced intimacy that reflected the idea of confinement some of the characters grapple with. The set pieces themselves were fairly minimalist with one chase, a harpsichord, a few chairs and a changing array of paintings. The walls of the space, which simply became a different room in a different house based on the arrangement of the limited furniture, looked as if they belonged in the paintings themselves, they were so artfully done. The colors were warm but not flashy and lit by candlelight they added to the intimate feel. Because, yes, this show was lit largely by candlelight. There were chandeliers with rings of candles on them, that lowered and rose as the amount of light was needed. Actors carried around large candlesticks in evening scenes, just as they would have in the pre-French revolution period that the show is set in. The dramatic lighting and sharp contrasts this provided really highlighted the betrayal and intrigue that is the at the heart of the production.

(I will not be talking about the show scene by scene but there may be some SPOILERS for those who have not seen the play)

Photo Credit (from UMS website): Johan Persson
Photo Credit (from UMS website): Johan Persson

This visual beauty was equally matched by the chemistry of the two leads. Janet McTeer and Dominic West, who play La Marquise de Merteuil and Le Vicomte de Valmont respectively, were both stunning. They were flirtatious, scornful, malicious, tender, brutally honest, humorous, and charming; usually all at the same time. At first their relationship was so much fun and it was the never-can-be-quite- platonic relationship of old lovers. Which just added a feeling of excitement to all their interactions. But it seemed for the most part, their cruel game of seduction and wits was more the reason for their friendship than their attraction for each other. That and the always lively banter.

Janet McTeer was especially striking. Dominic West left nothing to be desired; he played the charming bad boy with ruckus charm. No, it’s simply that I found the story and development of his character less intriguing. As a modern audience member, and I have no doubt in almost any period, I felt I’d seen it all before: the man who likes to sleep around but never really finds love in his string of lovers till one woman “changes” him and he gets in over his head. On the other hand, La Marquise de Merteuil in her time, and even now, was extremely fascinating. McTeer really made the character her own, capitalizing on opportunities to incorporate real humor, not even just malicious amusement, into La Marquise.

Photo Credit (from UMS website): Johan Persson
Photo Credit (from UMS website): Johan Persson

La Marquise used her knowledge of the patriarchal system to manipulate people, not just men, for her amusement and pleasure. She was able to find agency and, as she pointed out, it is necessary for women to be more skillful in this than men. While at first amazing and amusing, her ability and commitment to this manipulation slowly grew more and more disturbing. At one of my favorite lines of the show La Marquise said “I was born to dominate your sex, and avenge mine”, McTeer was particularly scary.

While I enjoyed that line, and still do frankly, I find its place within the show interesting to say the least. While for a time to a viewer this might appear true, as the play progresses and her obsession with revenge on an old lover and fear that Valmonte may no longer love her, slowly lead the audience members to question how she thought she was avenging anyone but herself. The same holds true for Valmont, though he proved less adept to the game. Perhaps the first very disturbing example of this was when, in Valmont’s seduction of the innocent

Photo Credit (from UMS website): Johan Persson
Photo Credit (from UMS website): Johan Persson

Cecile, he forced himself on her, telling her she couldn’t go to her mother because this could ruin her reputation. When Cecile confided in La Marquise about how upset she was and about her feeling of being violated, La Marquise told her basically to snap out of it. We got the sense that Cecile is supposed to be honored that she was being enlightened, and by such a master of the science of “pleasure”. Both of the main characters roles in this affair were extremely problematic: First, Valmont raping Cecile is very different from willing bedding a lot of women and showed a very different side of his character (even if this time period didn’t define rape as we do today). It’s the first time we saw some of the power he enjoyed exercising, so clearly. Secondly, by condoning and actually encouraging this interaction to both Valmont and Cecile, how was La Marquise avenging her sex by putting its fellow members at the mercy of men who could overpower them?

The next instance when audiences really realized La Marquise had lost it washer basically demanding that Valmont leave the women he loves. She has begun to realize Valmont actually loves his latest conquest and La Marquise’s jealousy is overpowering.Things advance and his latest conquest ends of being one of the many lives she ruins. Janet McTeer’s portrayal throughout this was natural and deceptively cunning, after her character; at moments her power of the stage and her character’s of the situation were daunting.

One thing I missed until the show basically threw it in my face, was the very numerous appearance of cards. They were used as prop pieces throughout the entire show, whenever someone needed to be busy in a corner. A card game actually opened the show. At the end, the last scene is done with the remaining women holding cards, “playing” a game, and that’s when I connected the dots. It’s really ingenious because the whole show was about people playing their cards and hoping they could outmaneuver the other’s cards. This final scene, with the women holding the cards, was also the moment when La Marquise was unable to deny her defeat. All her maneuvers had been for nothing. The vanity, savagery, and jealousy, with copious amounts of humor, blended into a delicious game whose story will keep audiences enthralled for many more years to come!

Review: Aaron Carter Concert

12743524_977328042343832_5850459296405899938_n

The Aaron Carter concert tonight, February 24th, at the Blind Pig, was sold out and full of college students (mostly girls) who were excited relive childhood memories.

Before the concert, I was a little bit worried because of the negative reviews that I read on Ticketmaster before seeing the show myself.  Unfortunately, this concert left me with the exact same complaints as some of the reviews.  The concert started 40 minutes late.  I always assume that concerts at large venues such as the Palace will begin a little late because the sets there are usually so big but I didn’t anticipate this long of a delay for a concert on a small stage at the Bling Pig.  After the 40 minute wait, the Ann Arbor native, Daniel Henig, opened up for Aaron Carter.

Daniel played the electric guitar, beatboxed, and sang tonight.  He was talented in all three areas so the ladies loved it.  He started off playing guitar and covering popular songs, such as “Drunk in Love” by Beyonce.  He carried himself with confidence and interacted with the crowd very well.  He played some songs from his new album after he got the crowd involved.  I personally thought that his voice sounded the best when he was singing his own songs rather than covers of songs.  Though his songs were great, it was hard to attract the crowd when nobody knew the words.  After giving the crowd a taste of his own music, he switched back to singing covers.  He caught the audience’s attention when he started playing the tune to “Sorry” by Justin Bieber on his guitar.  The audience was engaged by singing a familiar melody again.

Support this upcoming, talented Ann Arbor native by subscribing to his YouTube videos or going to his FREE concert tomorrow at the Michigan Theatre.  He sang the song featured in his new video, “Hostage.”  This song had a catchy chorus so he was able to maintain a connection with the audience even though they didn’t know the song.

Overall, Daniel Heing’s performance was great and he was definitely a crowd pleaser but I think that I would have enjoyed the performance a little bit more if it had started closer to the “start time” of 9pm.  Check out his YouTube channel here.

Aaron Carter finally came on around 10:30.  I was shocked that it took an hour and a half for him to come on stage.  He strolled onto the stage but once the music started playing, he was full of energy and performed throughout the entire concert with the same amount of enthusiasm.  His first three to four songs were from his new album that he is trying to promote.  Succeeding that part of his performance, the mood completely changed.  He started rapping and singing along with a few of his favorite throwback tunes.  I think that he did too many of these since most of the people came to hear their favorite throwback songs of his own.  Finally after about five songs, he announced something similar to, “Let me take you back to why you guys fell in love with my music.”  This preview made it clear that his next song would be one of his most popular and well-known.  The crowd began to cheer and he started singing “I want candy.”  Oddly, he only played the song for 45 seconds, maximum.  I saw a few girls look around, confused about why he cut it off so soon.  Soon after he did other favorites such as “Aaron’s party,” he was already finished.

The concert was certainly an interesting experience. I think that the experience would’ve been much better if the concert had started on time and if Aaron Carter didn’t only play “I want candy” for 45 seconds.  I was confused as to why the Daniel Heing had more time on stage than Aaron Carter when it wasn’t even advertised that there would be an opener when I bought my tickets.

Nevertheless, if you are still interested in seeing Aaron Carter, there is a show on Friday night as well (Maybe show up around 9:30pm rather than 9:00). The information for that concert can be found here.

Preview: Aaron Carter Concert

The Aaron Carter Concert is tonight, February 24th at 9pm.  The event is 18+ at the Blind Pig.

Aaron Carter began his career at the age of seven and over the succeeding five years he made a name for himself.  He stood out because of his energetic and charismatic style.  Some of his first gigs were opening for the Backstreet Boys and Britney Spears.

I’m sure that most of us college students remember Aaron Carter singing the song “I want candy” from Lizzie McGuire on Disney Channel.  Come out and relive childhood memories at the Blind Pig tonight with me!

tumblr_mjy2twpfu41qlo2n6o1_500

The tickets at $15 for general admission and $65 for meet and greet.  There is also a show on February 26th.  For more information about that show, click here.

 

PREVIEW:”Les Liaisons Dangereuses”- Intrigue at Michigan Theater

National Theater Live brings scandal to the Michigan Theater, in the form of Christopher Hampton’s award winning play, Les Liaisons Dangereuses. Wednesday’s screening is a recording of a National Theater’s live performance of the play in London. This production marks the thirty year anniversary of the play, which is directed by Josie Rourke and stars a cast of Elaine Cassidy, Janet McTeer, and Dominic West.

Originally a novel by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos, it was adapted by Christopher Hampton in 1985. It was first performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company with a cast that included the late Alan Rickman as the Vicomte de Valmont. It has been adapted into a film as well, titled Dangerous Liaisons that starred Glenn Close, John Malkovich and Michelle Pfeiffer.

Photo Credit: Johan Persson
Photo Credit: Johan Persson

Les Liaisons Dangereuses is a story of intrigue, sex, morals, and manipulation. Set in pre-revolutionary France, the play follows the lives and rivalries of a group of aristocrats. As scandalizing as when the novel was first released, the play is sure to leave audiences amazed.

The screening at Michigan Theater is Wednesday, February 24th at 7:00 pm. Tickets are $22 for adults and $12 for students. The show has a runtime of 3 hours, that includes a 15 minutes intermission.