Trolls review

Not to be a party pooper but in the first half an hour of this movie, I thought I was going to faint because it felt like Elle Woods from Legally Blonde on steroids! Or perhaps a better description would be an ecstasy trip! Or better yet a Lisa Frank’s fantasy world. I should add that I myself have been compared to Elle Woods because of my effervescence. But, I just thought things were a little too happy and the color of the animation a bit over-the-top.

But, as time progressed this movie contained character arcs, changes, and twists and turns.

Brief Synopsis: The Trolls are little critters who are always happy. Always. They hug, sing, dance, scrapbook, and even poop cupcakes! They even plan hug times. But alas, about 20 years ago they were spotted by the Bergens who cannot feel happy. The only times the Bergens can feel happy is if they devour a troll ( talking about an oral fix in terms of filling a void).

20 years later, Princess Poppy is in charge ( her father King Peppy used to be ruler of the roost)- and she is as optimistic and happy as they come. She decides to throw a party to the celebrate the 20th anniversary of the escape from the Bergens. But a rather grey (on inside and outside) troll named Branch says that this would be a terrible idea- because it would attract the Bergens. And he ends up being right.

Some trolls get captured. Poppy realizes that she is one of the only ones who is one of the only ones who is willing to go to Bergenland to get rescue them ( this made me sad and wonder if most of the Trolls happiness and kindness was superficial). On the way she gets captured by spider- like animals in the forest and Branch comes to her rescue.

They make it to the Bergenland where it is soon discovered that the trolls are being guarded by the scullery maid Bridget. They also discover that she has a crush on the prince of the Bergens. They strike a deal with her- that if she frees them, then they can turn her into ‘Lady Glitter Sparkles.”

Eventually the date happens. And later.. the trolls are captured. Partially thanks to a mole troll. Branch gets some color in him. And well… you will have to see the movie to see the rest.

I will say that there are two characters who confess their love by ‘romantic hugs.’ And I was surprised that there were no kisses between such characters! Perhaps, you the reader can guess which two characters romantically hug? The Bergen couple or the troll couple..

The film gives some good messages. Especially that happiness is inside all of us- and that we need a way to access it. A friend of mine recently was saying that she felt that I was discussing a crush/love interest way too much. Her reasoning was that I needed to find God to mainly focus on and that perhaps I had a void. According to the Bergens, you found happiness by eating trolls. I guess Poppy’s answer would be to access the happiness inside you- the happiness that all of us have.

On college campuses many of us do try to look externally to find happiness. Especially through temporary devices of pleasure. Starbucks coffee. Clothes from Pitaya; friends, and even “friends.” With so much stress in a new environment– it’s easy to understand why. But perhaps, we need to be reminded of Poppy’s message- that we have happiness within, we just need to access it.

So if you are thinking of accessing this message or boosting your happiness within go see this movie! With the exception of me most mind find the bright coloredness of this film an amazing world to enter into.

OHHHH and Before I forget I wanted to say that The 70’s music was great as was the 70’s style roller rink segment. Having lost a parent recently, the song “Sound of Silence” was a great one to hear. But for those boosting pleasure and happiness, other songs from hippie, funk, disco era are omnipresent. So go, see and be happy!

Trolls Preview

Finals Season is upon us! If you need a break from craziness and want to live in a technicolor dream ( or rather CGI dream) then go see this colorful pic! It has the honest, cynical character named appropriately Brash and the cheerful happy-go-lucky character named Poppy! And it is about Poppy facing a problem once and these two working together to come and fix things!
If a visual color fest and clashing of personalities is not enough for you to go and see this, then another reason is nostalgia! Does anyone remember the 90s figurines with the funny colorful hair! I sincerely do. Which is why I am going to see it. Especially because my Daddy used to buy me those and he died a few months ago. It took me a while to write again for the Artscene blog. But as my first attempt- I thought that this would be a good movie that could help me write again.

Spotlight Movie Review

Synopsis ( spoiler alert!) : This story is about the Investigative journalism unit within the Newspaper, “The Boston Globe.” In fact, “Spotlight” is the longest running investigative unit of a newspaper in the US. In the beginning of the movie, Martin “Marty” Baron ( played by Liev Schreiber) is the new editor for the “Boston Globe.” He reads an article about Lawyer Mitchell Garabedian who found out that Cardinal Bernard Law knew about a Priest abusing children and did NOT take any action to stop him. Spotlight sends Rezendes ( played by Mark Ruffalo) to go talk with Garabedian. Garabedian, a very solitary, singular-minded, workaholic lawyer ( played by Stanley Tucci) initially does not want to disclose any details with Rezendes. But later changes his mind, once Rezendes reveals that he is with Spotlight.
At first the Spotlight team think that they are searching for just one priest. Then they meet with Phil Saviano who heads the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, who informs them that there are 13 priests who are abused. Then through Richard Sipe ( a man who helped rehabilitate priests who had abused) they learn that there are 90 priests.
The journalists all do extensive research and meet up with actual victims. Rachel McAdams’ character Sacha Pfeiffer meets with a victim who was nervous and ate nervously. The two connect on that, and the victim reveals to her that he is homosexual. She tries to connect with her victims- some who shut the door in her face. One is a priest who actually admittedly admits that he molested children, but denies that he raped them. When she asks him, how he knows that is not rape, “He says I would know because I was raped.” Before he can talk further a woman ( perhaps his sister) tells him to stop talking and shuts the door in Rachel McAdams’ face.
As the movie proceeds one of the journalists worries about other newspapers beating them to the story- which could hurt other victims in the process. It is also revealed the Cardinal Law knew about the abuse, but tried to do a cover-up. The story also gets a bit pushed to the back burner thanks to 9/11. But, eventually… well the rest is history.

The power of the newspaper:
I loved that this movie showed people the power of investigative journalism- it is not something you usually see in this day and age. When I came as a freshman, I wanted to major in journalism. I was told by an academic adviser, “ That is a major that is not offered here. But, it is also technically not a major” Housemates later said that they don’t believe what is in the news about the war in Afghanistan, and that you cannot trust the media. They said, that one of their cousins is actually in Afghanistan ( I am not sure whether as a member of the armed forces or as a member of the NGO) and that they get the news from him. This is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to hearing from my peers about the lack of their belief and faith in the credibility of newspaper industry- and journalism as a whole.

If you compound that with how in the Great Recession many newspapers like the Detroit Free Press or the Time Picayune have died or reduced their circulation ( thanks to their advertisers pulling out) as well as many citing newspapers’ method of circulation being slow compared with online news then it is easy to say that newspapers/journalism do not share the best reputation in the 21st century.

So as someone who loves journalism and newspapers it was very pleasing to see classic print journalism at its best- from all aspects. It was great to see Sacha and Rezendes on their feet as reporters as they interview victims; and it was equally great to see how employees from the Boston Globe’s library wheeling up books and materials in carts to the journalists. Getting research is a fact-finding process involving books, and materials to be brought up from the bowels of buildings- it is not a superficial line of work. It requires depth and legwork, that’s what resonates with audiences when they see the books being wheeled- they are symbol of the depth of investigative journalism.

The filmmakers could have easily taken out the boring scenes of books being wheeled around. But this is purposeful. The wheeling of the books are a symbol which show the machine of journalism. And as a fan of print journalism, I am a fan.

A boys club based on ethnicity: Now, I have only to been to Boston once and briefly- on a layover flight when I was 8 years old. In other words, I don’t know much. Yea, I have heard my Dad and others say that they liked Boston. But, truth be told I don’t know much about it.
But perhaps once, I heard that Boston is not like a real city like New York or Chicago- but more of a big town. Well, if this movie has taught me anything, Boston is a town indeed; and this town is run by a good ol’ boys club; and this boys’ club is comprised of those who are Irish Catholic. Not WASPS, not Jews, not Armenians, but Catholics who run this city.
I was shocked when I heard men at the golf course discuss the new editor’s Jewishness so openly and negatively question how he would belong as a Jew in Boston. Later when Baron met with the Cardinal, he gave Baron a gift ( knowing of Baron’s religious background) calling it the true guide to understanding Boston. It was a Catechism .
When Garabedian and Rezendes sup together, Garabedian says to Rezendes that he is an outsider (being Armenian) who does not belong here. Then he says that in order to show to the wrongs in this city, it needs outsiders like them to do so.

I was going to fall off my chair hearing all these ethnic assertions. Could this really be? Personally speaking, I cannot fully believe these statements. I cannot believe that things are that rigid. You hear about glass ceilings but, ethnic ceilings in modern times (versus say the 1920s) is news to me. But then again, I did not live through such happenings..

Parting Thoughts:
This film included a great Ensemble cast with actors who portrayed reporters as diligent, passionate, and humble (with Rezendes’ character being a bit sarcastic) and other actors like Garabedian as irreverent but good-hearted; it had appropriate and somber art direction and lighting that for instance, showed the Cardinal’s church as this dark cave and the city of Boston always under the shadow of some gloomy clouds. For a movie which was not about war, or famines, it showed suspense and intrigue thanks to a great musical score, and cinematography-Rezendes running to the court house is such a scene. In these and in many other ways, it truly is filmmaking at its best.

Spotlight movie preview

I remember. I remember when waking up, getting ready for grade school, and sleepily munching on my cereal. And hearing the tv news anchors say “ Something about sex abuse with young boys in the Catholic Church.” This was hard to fathom as trix was slowly being munched in my mouth. I remember thinking, “Boys get sexually abused.. I thought that happened more to girls?” Another question I had was, “.. Catholic church priests’ are the ones who are abusing..How is this possible?” I was not sure if it was the morning or abuse and church being in the same sentence, but none of this made sense.
Well grade school ended and summer vacation began. I remember Peter Jennings night after night discussing about more sexual abuse cases coming out. One time I remember a grown man, a victim, go to a priest and ask him why he did this.
If you are like me and remember your childhood background music being sprinkled by such atrocities, then you may want to hear about how these stories made it to the press- or rather almost did not make it to the press.
This movie has a lot of good ensemble acting; great dialogue; and shows a lot of intricacies and nuances to Boston society. The costume and art design also highlight the somber tone and mood of both the story line and Boston itself.
This movie is a great one cinematically and as well as being a great story! Believe it or not, this story can still be found at some theaters and video on demand ( and of the course the state theater’s midnight screenings)! Go see it!

Brooklyn movie Review

Review

Spoiler Alert:

The synopsis of Brooklyn is relatively simple. A young woman works in the town sundry, general good store.  She seems to be capable and efficient, whereas her employer is insulting to her customers. Later at dinner it is revealed to her mother and sister (though it seems that her sister already knows) that she is to be traveling to America for work. She indicates that her housing is secure as well, and that all of this has been secured by a Priest. Her mother mentions something of her return, yet they all feel that this might not be a possibility. The young girl is very naïve on the ship. Eating and getting food poisoning, only to be later guided by another more experienced passenger. She comes to live in a boarding house with other women, faces homesickness, takes classes, and works. As spring comes she finds adjustment and eventually love. She even marries. Due to a tragedy she has to return to Ireland, and eventually begins to have a double life, and new love. One day when someone says that they know the truth, she reveals to her mother that she must return. And return she does, to her husband.

Over all Brooklyn is great! It is a very honest whole-rest-paced portrayal of a young woman as she navigates the journey to a new country and her first months there. It is very honest when it shows Eilis’ food poisoning on the boat, her initial maladjustment at her job at a shop, her somewhat dowdy attire in her initial arrival in Brooklyn, and her periods of homesickness, nostalgia, and tears.  In the process, as I said in the preview, this film is a visual delight which uses great lighting, costumes and good facial acting to light up the screen, and at times dull dreary Brooklyn.

Pastel picture perfect image

As the story progresses we can see more smiles rather than downcast eyes on Eilis’ facial palette. Her grip on the country is also experienced in the certainty in her tone. But the biggest arena where you see that she has fully blossomed in her new country is evident by the different pastel hues of her costumes. I love the yellow cinched at the waist full skirted chiffon dress she wears as she drops off a letter in the mail box. I love the periwinkle top she wears as the other young ladies teach her to eat pasta.  She is simply a vision.

The problem with this film

I feel like people are going to invent a way to throw tomatoes at me through the internet for even having this subheading.  After all, this movie was named one of the best of the year, nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award, and some have compared it to a beautiful Victorian Novel. It is a beautiful movie. It is heartfelt and honest, and I go to expound on this further. But I just have to say that at times I found that this movie dragged on and on. I am no adrenaline junkie when it comes to movies. However, it just seemed that this movie from her arriving to New York, to her troubled days at work, to crying upon receiving a letter, to just living… seemed to really drag on. Some might say that this is a throwback to neorealism- which showed scenes that nobody really wanted to see.  I like the emotional honesty and honest portrayal of what it is like for someone to adjust in a new country. But, perhaps 3 minutes somewhere along the way could have been shortened.

In addition, I thought that the end had such an anti-climactic ending. Yes, it is heartwarming to see her and her husband embrace and kiss when they rejoin. It is lovely, how the camera freezes on that moment. But, to portray so much of her courting another man , settling in at her sister’s former job, going on and on about her  new life in Ireland, and then before you know it she is in the arms of her husband—it just seemed a bit sudden! Her reunion with her husband should have been a bit lengthened. Or they could have cut down on her time in Ireland where she takes on her old life. That just went on and on…

A Feminist Story

A line that really resonated with me was when someone told Eilis, “Pretty plus you have qualifications, “Which I think is often a University of Michigan or any college educated woman’s dream. To us, this is the idea of having it all.  Many of us are not at the stage of children, a house, and a husband. But to be a confident, pretty woman, with an education is more of the current dream.

If I were to take it one step further I would say that this movie is a feminist one. This is a woman who makes a solo journey, gets a job, takes classes, decides how she feels about someone, decides what she is going to do with her body, etc. And all of this is done before feminism was a real word.

A mystery

The one thing that I was surprised to hear about was that her sister died, or more so how she died. Sometimes as she looked at letters from Eilis she looked a bit of envious. It mostly looked wistful, but with a tinge of envy or lost wondering. I wonder, especially as she could see her sister carve a life for herself, of what would happen with her life. Was she worried about always being the older sister forced to take care of her mother? Was she sad? Did that lead to her death?

We never found out why she died.  A small part of me thought that it was suicide. But after that idea was ruled out, I thought that perhaps her death had to do with more emotional reasons rather than physical.

Throwback to Neorealism

This film is somewhat reminiscent of I Girasoli (the sunflower) directed by Vittorio De Sica and the screenplay written by Cesare Zavattini. They are both behind the nonrealistic classic Bicycle Thief (Or in Italian Bicycle Thieves). In Girasoli, Mastro Mastrianni’s character Antonio loved Sophia Loren’s character Giovanna and even marries her- though he says that he is not the marrying type. Later during World War II he is almost half dead in the snow, when a Russian woman saves him. He eventually marries her. While in Italy Giovanna and her mother-in-law are consumed with worry. One day Giovanna goes to Russia only to find Antonio… married to another with a child.

In this movie, Antonio cannot put his dual identities together: His Italian past, with what Russia and the Russian woman who finds him. He cannot juggle the concept that this woman saved my life, and I owe her, and possibly Russia to a large extension but Italy is my home- I have people who love me there. Of course, we the outsider can say this so easily with an omniscient viewpoint.  We don’t know what the hell war does to people, and how it can not only kill people but put minds asunder.

Immigration and the life before and after coming to a new world- don’t always balance equally in the mind as well. In fact in an Abnormal Psychology textbook I read that schizophrenia happens a lot new immigrants. I cannot remember exactly why, but perhaps this has a lot to do with the balance to different identities and all that they encompass.

Another thing about both movies is that they show rather certain mundane scenes that more formalistic (or shall we say showy) films might not show.  In other words, both have scenes which seem to go on and on, and don’t always show the prettiest of things ( Eilis suffering food poisoning) and the camera panning on Antonio’s Russian home.. It’s mundane and at times not cute.

Honesty we can All Relate to

At times we might think that we have nothing in common with this movie because we are not an immigrant in the 1950s coming to Brooklyn. But we are all going through some sort of growth where we have to go through the not pretty stages of something. But in the end we blossom from it. This film does an excellent job of not being shy of exposing the drudge that can accompany new experiences and growth.

If you want to vicariously live through someone else’s experience, and yet relate it back to your experience of living, then this is the film for you.

Oh one more thing…

Another fun tidbit of this film is that it showcases… Jessica Pare!!!! This is the actress who portrayed Megan Draper in Mad Men. If you are like me and you go and stalk movies (and TV shows) that show former Mad Men cast members- then that just should be all the reason you need to go see this film!

But Mad Men cast spotting aside, truly: Go see this film.

Brooklyn movie Preview

Brooklyn Preview

Wonder what it would be like for a young woman to make a solo journey to America during the 1950s? What her hopes, her fears, and worries might be? Would you like to experience this vicariously?
If so then Brooklyn is the movie for you! It is a visual delight which uses great lighting, costumes and good facial acting to light up the screen, and at times dull dreary Brooklyn (although I would like to think that Brooklyn is at times is a character of the story and as Sarah Jessica Parker said about New York in regards to Sex in the City, it is another character)
This movie is a combination of love story meets coming of age story. At the same time, it shows how at times it can be hard for certain people have two identities/roles to juggle the two, and not let one overtake the other. In this case it is Eilis in a way, has a trickier time juggling her newfound American immigrant identity with that of her Irish soul.
But what this film is even more about is temptation in the context of out of sight out of mind. Let’s just say Eilis somewhat follows the path of Mastro Mastrianni from the movie Girasoli (Sunflower). He was an Italian WWII officer who was lying frozen/almost dead when the Allied troops went into Russia. When he recovers he marries the lovely Russian girl who saves his life. All the while forgetting the woman he is married to in Italy- played by the goddess Sofia Loren. But as I said earlier, Eilis somewhat follows his path- not completely. In order to see what Eilis does, well you just have to go see this movie, won’t you?
Also, if you need another reason to see this- think of her Saoirse Ronan. If you ever wondered what happened to that girl in Atonement- then this movie offers your answer. She blossoms into a bright beauty and brilliant actress. Unlike other child stars (cough…Lindsay Lohan)…
Enough of Lindsay Lohan—go see this movie!