REVIEW: Wild Child w/sg Elliot Moss

image9
Photo Credit: Mady Martin

Before the show even started I was already interested. The audience on this Halloween night clearly came from all walks of life. There was the Ark’s more typical, older crowd, dressed quite well for their Saturday night out and looking a bit nervous, a bit amused. There were groups of high school students scattered throughout, clinging on to one another, beaming at the crowd around them, thinking they were cool to be here, among these adults. There were the couples: the twenty-somethings and thirty-somethings, dressed like adults with their lives together but still willing to have a bit of fun (AKA the older hipster look), looking like they were freshly graduated, or freshly engaged, or freshly married–looking fresh and ready for the world. Then there were the college students–both in and out of costume. Don’t get me wrong, individuals of all ages were in costumes (I was escorted to my seat by an older Rosie the Riveter), but it was the students who dominated the costume game that night. I saw angels and vampires, farmers and Wes Anderson characters, Tororo and Pikachu, all before the lights dimmed. It was quite the crowd.

image2
Photo Credit: Mady Martin

Let me say, before I start, that I greatly enjoyed Elliot Moss. And judging by the fact that I left with an Elliot Moss shirt instead of a Wild Child one, I would say that I enjoy Elliot Moss more than Wild Child. However, I’m not sure Elliot Moss is the right choice for an opening act for a band like Wild Child.

They started with the song “Highspeeds,” a song with distorted vocals and deep, dark beats which would sink into your chest until you confused them with your own heartbeats, until your own heart was beating arrhythmically  but you didn’t mind the skipping beats. It was a moody song and with the Ark’s acoustics, it sounded pretty good. From there they shifted between their more rock sounds and their ambient noises and these little beats tinkling here and there, so delicate and so fragile, that I was surprised they didn’t break. Although we didn’t know it yet, these sounds would be quite the contrast to Wild Child’s performance.

The crowd responded respectfully. They clapped after every song and they listened with intent. While it was happening, I thought they were really enjoying the performance–but once Wild Child came on, I realized they had been holding back.

An opening act is an uphill battle. You are fighting for a crowd that isn’t yours, a crowd that is waiting for you to leave the stage, waiting to see what they paid for. You have to win this crowd over, convince them you aren’t wasting their time. I’m not sure Elliot Moss did this–nor am I even sure he ever could. Wild Child is a lively, rowdy, folksy band. They move, they dance, they banter. They get you up on your feet and singing and dancing along. They have seven members on stage and instead of a sound where every note is clear, every beat is heard, every string carefully constructed, they have an entire orchestra of noise going on, and while it is wonderful in its own way, it is nothing like the hypnotic waves of Elliot Moss. It is loud. It is powerful. It demands a response.

If that is what the crowd came to see, what hope did Elliot Moss have of winning its heart? While I appreciated the contrast, I think ultimately, he was ill-suited to open for Wild Child. Even the lights of the stage–all colors, all bright, all warm–weren’t right for them and their sound.

Wild Child was well-received.

(Bonus: Image of Wild Child in costume. Most notably Kelsey Wilson dressed as fellow singer, Alexander Beggins.)

image5
Photo Credit: Mady Martin

REVIEW: Chicago Symphony Orchestra

October has been a very exciting month for orchestra lovers; from the New York Philharmonic’s residency in Ann Arbor earlier this month to this performance by the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, we have not been disappointed.

A bit of bragging moment: earlier that day, I had an opportunity to play for Dwight Parry, an oboist from Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra who has been touring with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra as the principal oboe. He was very inspirational — with much focus on technique as well as musicality, I learned a lot from him. Here’s a proof:

Oboist Dwight Parry (right) instructing me to play with more forward motion.
Oboist Dwight Parry (right) instructing me at the master class.

As a orchestral musician, Mr. Parry has a lot of experience in auditioning and judging auditions. Many of us classical musicians stress over the whole audition process all the time. Winning a position in an orchestra through auditions is extremely difficult — with hundreds of well-qualified applicants fighting over one seat, which is typically to be filled for decades once someone wins the spot. He mentioned that, when he is judging auditions, he is looking for a “colleague” — someone that can play in tune and in tempo, and that is overall pleasant to work with. These words stuck out to me as a lesson.

After that interaction with Mr. Parry, seeing him among many other superb musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra made me feel much closer to the orchestra. And I thought a lot about colleagues in an ensemble. What does it mean to play with the same people on your left and on your right for many, many years? Ideally, these players would develop the chemistry among them that make the “group” sound instead of “individual” sounds. However, this is not always the case, as conflicts and drama do happen. How do you act professional and deliver high-quality music to the audience with your colleagues?

To me, CSO seemed to do this very well. From the first “overture” — “The Victors” — to the last movement of Mahler’s First Symphony, the chemistry was there. (Has “The Victors” become a new tradition for all orchestras visiting Ann Arbor to play?) Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony (with the iconic “duh-duh-duh-dummmmm” in the first movement) and Mahler’s First Symphony (with full of contrasts and shining moments for all instruments) are both classic favorites, and CSO gave no less than spectacular.

UMS has two more (international!) orchestras coming this season: Royal Philharmonic Orchestra from London in January, and Montreal Symphony Orchestra from Quebec in March. I am very much looking forward to exploring more orchestral artistry in the upcoming months.

 

 

PREVIEW: Fiction @ Literati: Marlon James

Photo Credit: Jeffrey Skemp

Marlon James is coming to Literati tomorrow (November 2nd). He was originally supposed to come on October 12th, but due to his nomination for the Man Booker Prize (awarded on October 13th) he was unable to make it. But now, after winning that award, he will be here. Yes, that’s right, little Literati will be hosting a Man Booker Prize winner just two short weeks after his award.

He will be reading from his latest novel, A Brief History of Seven Killings, which, at 704 pages, is a brick of a novel. The story spirals out from a  failed assassination attempt on Bob Marley, until it encompasses an entire world of seedy criminal enterprises and covers twenty years of Jamaican history.

The reading will take place at 7 PM, but considering Literati’s cramped space and the possibility of a large crowd, I’d recommend getting there as early as you can.

For more information: http://www.literatibookstore.com/event/fiction-literati-marlon-james

Review: Hubbard Street Dance Chicago

I went to the Hubbard Street Dance Chicago performance on Tuesday night, October 27th, at the Power Center.  It was absolutely breathtaking.  The choreographer, William Forsythe, who is known for his “variously extended” and “warped” style of ballet, lived up to that world-renowned reputation. Each performance was executed with the same amount of grace and precision.  Since the choreography was outstanding and paired with the incredibly talented dancers, all three pieces left vivid memories in my head. 

“N.N.N.N” was extremely impressive because the dancers were on stage for twenty minutes without any music.  They emphasized their sounds—clapping, breathing, and sniffing— while making very swift and controlled movements.  That alone was enough to keep me engaged throughout the entire dance.  I found myself in awe thinking about how much practice and focus it must take to memorize sounds while doing moves that are so physically demanding.  It did not matter to me that the message was unclear.  I was mesmerized enough by the fact that if one of the four dancers missed a single move or sound that the entire dance would be thrown off.  They couldn’t talk and didn’t have an abundance of other dancers or music to make up for a miscommunication or wrong move.  When the curtain closed, I didn’t think it could get much better but it did.

The piece that sticks with me the most is “Quintett”.  In this performance, I could tell how extremely athletic the dancers have to be in order to dance so brilliantly. They were able to stay in character and focused while making fluid movements that took strength and agility.  My favorite dancer was the woman in an orange dress. I found myself following her even while the other four dancers were on the stage. I enjoyed how her motions, especially with her legs, were always elongated and dramatized.  When she kicked her legs up, it would be drawn out as if she was gracefully reaching for something on a shelf in front of her with her toes.  The song that they danced to in this piece was not what I would’ve expected to be paired with a classical tune.  At first I thought that the repetitiveness of the accompaniment would distract me from the dancers but it ended up fitting in very well.  This performance had the theme of love.  There was almost always one woman and one man dancing together.  The theme of love, along with their exhaustion, created an apparent strong connection between the dancers.  After this performance, I found myself smiling and couldn’t wait for the lights to turn on for intermission so that I could talk about what I loved and thought about the performance.

The enthusiasm that I had carried into the last dance, “One Flat Thing”.  This piece had me at the edge of my seat.  I knew that “One Flat Thing” was inspired by Captain Scott’s doomed trip to the South Pole so I was looking for signs of that.  There were tables set up on stage, 4×5.  I think that the tables were supposed to represent sheets of ice and obstacles that the voyagers had to face.  I think that the dancers were representing the people struggling to survive.  The play was really energetic right from the beginning, when dancers dragged the tables to the front, to the end, where all the dancers dragged the tables to the back.  Doing this demonstrating that they were in a very chaotic state.  The choreography, the back story, and the music created so much intensity.  The way that the performance ended with a “bang” left me dumbfounded and satisfied.

I was astounded at the end of every performance.  If the dance group comes back in the following years, it is not a performance that I would want to miss because seeing Hubbard Street Dance Chicago enhanced my appreciation for dance.  

For mind blowing explanations of the organizational structure of “One Flat Thing”, click here

Men, Women, and Children Review

This is a film about how technology and the internet affect all of us- whether that be men, women, and children. There are probably a multitude of ways in which our phones and internet affect our lives. Whether it is my friend who is in medical school and posted on Facebook that he couldn’t pass his medical school classes without the internet. Then there are my feminist friends (who are deeply concerned with gender politics) who say that thanks to GPS on our phones, the answer to the age-old question of who should ask for directions –is ask Siri!
This film explores different avenues internet technology has permeated our lives. The first trope this film brings to my mind is the Kris Jennerization effect the internet has on parenting, and moreover people’s careers. In this film, a high school student named Hannah is an aspiring actress. She even goes to a casting call for a reality TV show. Her mom is like a Kris Jenner who exploits her daughter’s sexuality by taking salacious pictures of her and posting them on a website. She believes that this will expose her daughter more, bring advertisers to the website, and this in turn will bring them more money for photo and modeling shoots. The reason I said that this story line reminds me of Kris Jenner, is because Kris Jenner uses the platform of the internet to catapult her daughters’ images to the world- and sometimes with the help of salacious photos and photo shoots revolving her daughters.
Another trope of how internet technology permeates our lives is by giving us access into our children’s lives. Brandy Beltmeyer is a normal 21st century high school student in this movie who wants to use the internet to stay in touch with friends. BUT, her mother Patricia Beltmeyer will have NONE of this. And obsessively monitors all her social media activity, to the point of deleting her social media accounts. Brandy, eventually succumbs to making a secret Tumbler account so that she can maintain a friendship with her friend Tim- an ex-football player.
Patricia represents the helicopter, overprotective, smothering parent in the 21st century. Smothers and have always existed throughout the dawn of time. And they will be damned if a little thing like social media will get their way of tightening their grip on their children. Even if this means knowing their children’s social media passwords, and checking every word posted on social media websites. Jennifer Garner portrays the rigid, uptight Patty Beltmeyer convincingly.
Then there is the matter of relationships and the internet. First there is the loveless couple (the husband is portrayed by Adam Sandler) who end up cheating on each other thanks to websites such as Ashley Madison. Then there is their son who sees so much pornography on a daily basis that well he cannot get ‘high’ from the regular amount of porn he sees! Tim, the ex-football player finds companionship through Brandy thanks to her use of a secret tumbler account. It should be noted that Tim also uses the internet to heavily play online video games as a way to cope with an injury which prevents him from rejoining football, and also a way to cope with the loss of his mother who left the family.
The narratives and stories in the subplots are captivating; and a lot of these stories are interwoven (e.g. Tim and Brandy) and it is interesting to see how one of these subplots affects the other. I furthermore like, how the messages characters post on the internet interface on the screen so, the audience can fully see and feel the larger than life/3-d effect these messages have on their character’s mind and emotions.
Perhaps my only complaint for this movie is the title. This movie is so much about how technology/the internet encompasses our life in helping us enhance our careers, helping us maintain our friendships, accessing information, giving us the first glimpse into pornography, and even being the last resort in rekindling our marriages and being yet another tool in tightening the leash onto our children. Though many of these things happen to men, women and children (the title of the film)-the title of the film should reflect the seeping quality of technology in our lives.
One last reason I love this film is because it has the Jason Reitman touch to it. And what I love about director Jason Reitman is that he really isn’t afraid to show the times that we live in and the often mundane aspects of our lives- and highlight them, build stories regarding them, which captivates us and holds our interests. He did this with the movie up in the Air regarding joblessness and the recession and now with internet and internet based communication in this film. None of his films have murders, war, or really crazy things going on, yet his films are interesting and make the viewer want to keep on watching. That said, I hope that you can go out and truly see this film- it will hold your interest.

Men, Women, Children Preview

In this day and age where our lives are often ruled by
iPhones/androids/smartphone/cellphones- or basically anything that is digital and connected to the
internet- we often don’t have a bird’s eye view of who all of these forms of communication fully affect
human relationships. We live by these vessels of technology but we don’t see ourselves living in the
midst of such technology. Well, that is until now. This movie also manages to interweave several
storylines of people in a town, the struggles and triumphs of their existences, as well as how their lives
interact with each other. If you are looking for a story about the ups and downs of human life, and how
our iPhones and Smartphones affect the ride called life, then this is the movie for you.