REVIEW: Bullet Catch

Rob Drummond’s show turned out to be less of a straightforward magic show, and more of a synthesis of magic show, deadpan comedy routine, and one-man stage play. The performance contained a nice mix of stunts that were outright theatrical, and stunts that played with the mind. All the while, listening to Drummond’s Scottish accent was much more soothing to the ears compared to a previous week of listening to various professors lecture.

Right at the beginning, Drummond picks a volunteer from the audience, and so for the next hour and fifteen minutes, the stage is shared by two people. As he explains, his volunteers are never picked on and paraded in front of the audience to be laughed at—these volunteers are there to build a relationship. Our volunteer, Alexis, aided Drummond with each of his tricks, read snippets of writing, and warmed the room with her laughter. Each trick told us new information about her, so that by the time she had to shoot at Drummond, we had a relationship with her that was almost as close as our relationship with Drummond.

Seeing the tricks themselves was like being a child again. Drummond took a hammer to a beer bottle and smashed it in half; then he took the top half and made it disappear inside one of four paper bags. After moving them to his chest of tricks and mixing them up, he smashed them, one by one, with his hand at Alexis’ (the volunteer) request. Somehow she narrowed it down so that the final bag was the one with the bottle. Mind blown.

In another trick, Drummond gave Alexis a choice of seven cards: each with a different desire such as travel, career, money, or sex. Through a series of questions and answers, he asked her to think of a memory and a person involved, and made his guesses by writing on sheets of paper. Drummond guessed the day she was thinking of (almost exactly), the name of the boy she danced with, and the card she picked (sex). Again, mind blown.

At one point during the show, Drummond performed a trick with his assistant, and at its conclusion he asked the audience if we wanted to see how it was performed. Those that wanted it to remain a mystery were asked to close their eyes, while the curious ones kept their eyes open. I won’t spoil anything, but I do wish I had kept my eyes shut to preserve the magic. Unfortunately (or not), Drummond never reveals how he does the bullet catch, and that alone preserves the magical aura of the performance.

Throughout the performance, Drummond presented a story of another magician who was shot and killed accidentally by a performer. I checked online and I don’t believe the magician actually existed, so as far as I can tell the entire thing is Drummond’s (inspired) work. The shocked volunteer questions himself and what could have gone wrong, and only at the end does he realize that the magician WANTED to die. Before the finale, Drummond ties this all together by stating that in a world of nihilism and existential questioning, we have to have something in our lives to make it all worth it. He answers this question by asserting that the answer is the people around us.

Not necessarily a magic show, Rob Drummond’s Bullet Catch was a fantastic show and one of the best I have attended in and around Ann Arbor. Few people have the opportunity to see a bullet shatter a plate, and then watch as the same bullet is caught by a human being.

Rob Drummond's Bullet Catch
Rob Drummond’s Bullet Catch

PREVIEW: Bullet Catch

Watch this video First
Bullet Catch Trailer

That stunt is HERE in Ann Arbor.

Who: Rob Drummond catching a freaking bullet!
Where: The Arthur Miller Theatre (Up on North Campus)
When: January 7th – January 12

As the video says, this stunt is so dangerous even Houdini refused to do it. I don’t know about you, but it sounds worthwhile to see Rob Drummond perform something Houdini never did.

The best part of all, however, is that the show isn’t just a bullet catch! There is an entire magic show featuring levitation, games of chance, and of course the bullet catch.

Rob Drummond

REVIEW–Wolf of Wall Street

Scorsese’s Wolf of Wall Street is one of those movies that reminds me why I love watching movies so much. From Leonardo DiCaprio’s tremendous acting to the engaging and contentious script and of course a slew of technical marvel conducted by directorial legend Martin Scorsese, this is one of the most technically proficient films I have seen in a while. Wolf of Wall Street distinguishes itself from other technically proficient films, however, in its controversial and topically conscious subject matter. Inspired by the life of wall street trader and ex-convict (for insider trading) Jordan Belfort, the film depicts the glamorous and callous life of an investment banker, drawing strong thematic parallels between life in finance and life in the mafia.

 

Scorsese establishes this parallel in part by returning to filmmaking techniques he used in his classic ‘90’s gangster film Goodfellas. Wolf makes use of long tracking shots following DiCaprio through his personal carnival of grandeur, reminiscent of iconic shots of Ray Liotta walking through a five star restaurant in Goodfellas as if he owns the place. DiCaprio’s portrayal of Bancroft also defies common conceptions of investment bankers—rather than a reserved math wizard making calculated decisions, he is a swaggering and impetuous party animal with drug habits that make Scarface look like a teetotaler. DiCaprio’s performance is crucial to Scorsese’s message. His acting style creates a new archetype for the investment banker in Hollywood, a character type informed by the reckless behavior of investment firm executives precipitating the housing bubble of 2009.

 

DiCaprio’s performance owes a lot to Terrance Winter’s beautifully written script, a cynical critique of the moral hazards intrinsic to a deregulated capitalist economy. Winter’s script focuses on the idea that wealth allows an individual to live above the law. Bancroft’s character engages in selfish reckless behavior that warrants arrest throughout the film. He evades legal repercussions several times due to his wealth and status. Even at the end of the film, when Bancroft finally receives jail time, he spends his days in a prison nicer than most 5 star hotels, and returns home to plenty of wealth a few years later. Bancroft’s personal story serves as a metaphor for the housing bubble. Investment firms intentionally supported the housing bubble knowing they would be bailed out by taxpayer money. The firms were such an integral part of the economy that we had no choice to bail them out. Similarly, Bancroft lives the rockstar lifestyle, indulging in wanton drug binges and avoiding legal persecution because he can easily post bail and leverage his status to evade arrest.

 

I expect Wolf of Wall Street to be a major contender for awards during the academy awards. The film is excellent on all fronts—grandiose set design, fast-paced and intense editing, a cynical and topical script, perhaps DiCaprio’s best acting performance yet, and all of these elements held together by Scorsese’s directorial signature to form a coherent jaded post-recession retrospective on the self destructive, over-indulgent lifestyle of the elite which precipitated economic calamity on the US.

Preview for 12 Years A Slave

If anybody is curious to know how life would be like as the living dead.. well then this is the movie for you. This film gives you a window of how it would be like as a person who does not have any room to do anything they want, say what they want, talk when they want, not to be able to eat what they want, not have choices of what to do with their own body, and so much more.
If you are interested in vicariously living something.. then this is it for you. But, I also remember a teacher once told me that history shouldn’t be just remembered but experienced/visualized, and perceived by as many of the senses as possible. This film lives up to that.
I cannot think of a better way to experience the tragedy of being kidnapped and enslaved and to honor the souls who experienced such atrocities than to see this movie. I guarantee that you will feel not just more empathy after seeing it, but also have immense gratitude for your own life’s blessings.

Saving Mr. Banks Review

In some BIG ways this movie was a surprise. When I saw the trailer in the summer, I really thought that this movie was going to be about that P.L Travers who had a cold unloving,inattentive, unimaginative father, and then a nanny appeared out of nowhere.. and ended up saving her whole family- and especially her father. Hence, the title, ‘ Saving Mr. Banks!’ But much to my surprise, P.L Travers’ father was very loving and she idolized him; And he actually died from alcoholism because he was so unrealistic and drank his problems away..quite the opposite of a stern, overly realistic father as we see in Mary Poppins.He was also very, very imaginative. The lines, we hear in the movie “Mary Poppins,” Winds in the East, Winds to the West,” were actually said by her father in the movie at one point.
The woman who did come later as a nanny to help the Golf family actually failed to save Mr. Banks.. which I thought from the trailer she was going to do and be the inspiration behind Mary Poppins. It took me a while to realize this, but I guess what ended up happening was that P.L Travers.. imagined what would happen if her father could be saved and how the nanny would be if she could actually save him. So Mary Poppins is a mixture of this fantasy and idealism- and barely a morsel of reality.

I guess I was a bit disappointed because I was really hoping that when P.L Travers was a little girl that her father and her family were saved by this nanny who come out of nowhere and helped the whole family, and especially the father, out. I guess if it was real I would have been happier to know that though we cannot be totally saved by others during times of despair.. others can still offer some crucial help. Plus, I feel rather deceived by the trailer.

But the movie is still a good movie to see. The camerawork was amazing. In the opening scene you have the camera moving down from the sky onto the top of cherry blossoms, then through the cherry blossoms, and then through P.L Travers’ window. It almost gave the beginning a floaty, whimsical..imaginative feeling.. like a fantasy. I almost felt like I was dancing on clouds or eating cotton candy while riding a unicorn. Ironically. P. L Travers says to her agent soon after.. “Don’t they look like clouds?” in reference to the cherry blossoms.

I loved the art direction and how everything meticulously and truly represented the 1960’s. Whether it was the feel of the 1960s airport, the swimming pool by the P.L. Travers’ hotel, The look of the Mickey Mouses in her hotel room, etc. Along with the art direction, I loved the costumes on well, everybody. Whether it was Paul Giamatti’s thick rimmed glasses..Walt Disney’s skinny ties, Walt Disney’s secretary’s flipped hair and skirt suit… the costumes were great!

I will say that I liked Tom Hanks’ portrayal of Disney and how he made Walt Disney so affable. I loved the the acting of the young girl who portrayed a young P.L Travers and how she portrayed this perceptive little girl who rather be imaginative yet had to be an adult more than she would have liked. I also loved the actress who portrayed the mother of P.L Travers. She didn’t have too many speaking lines.. but by all her looks and glances.. she did the worrying for both parents in that family. She really echoed a mother who was trying to do her best.. but felt trapped because she couldn’t do much to change her husband, and also had the pressure of a family to tend to. I really felt bad when she almost committed suicide.. but I could really, really empathize with her. She felt that she really couldn’t help her husband’s drowning himself in alcohol.. so she would take control in the only way she could… Thanks to her daughter, she didn’t she didn’t control her life by cutting it short.

Last nor least, did I mention how much I LOVED Emma Thompson’s portrayal of P.L Travers. Oh My God.. this woman deserves an Oscar nomination for her portrayal. I love how she says, “Oh, no no no no” at least 15 times in this role.. with just enough fussiness! In many other ways, whether through the simplest glance or her short delivery of lines.. she manages to portray this fussy, immensely difficult, mostly somewhat tough, meticulous to the point of clinically obsessive- complusive –mostly unlikable woman. At the same point Thompson, puts in the cracks of likeability into her so that the audience doesn’t completely hate her. There is the time, when she tells Ralph the limo driver, that he is her favorite American and hands him a list of famous people who have had difficulties ( oh in case I forgot to mention it- I loved Giamiatti’s portrayal of Ralph).. but there are other more nuanced times, where you just give in to the fact that she is human. Like when she goes down to the hotel bar and tries to talk to the bartender.. but he doesn’t realize she is talking with him.. leaving her alone. For days she contemplates going down to the bar.. and when she does… she is unable to communicate with anybody. Or the night.. she needs something to hold while sleeping.. so she picks up the Mickey Mouse stuffed animal she initially detested. Yes, Thompson manages to breathe some humanness into this woman.. But furthermore, she manages to portray the pitiful aspects in this woman’s life.. After all this is a woman who is sadly kind of married to her father ( she did take his name…) and is very sore and hurt about the past.
In sum, this is a great and interesting movie to see- just don’t believe everything you see in a trailer.

I give it 4 out 5 stars.

Preview: Saving Mr. Banks

Ever see Mary Poppins? I am sure most of us have. I remember the first time I watched it, I was this little 7 year old thing. It is a classic, no doubt. Well, now you can see and hear about how this movie was made, or rather how it almost wasn’t made.
I am not gonna lie- I saw the trailer to this movie in the summer when I went to see the Butler and I have literally been counting down the days until the release of this film!
I couldn’t wait to see this movie because it talks about subjects that are very dear to me. One of them is how artists’/creators’ works can be so, so dear to them.. that it is hard for them to let them go. As was the case with P.L Travers- the creator of Mary Poppins. The other subject I really wanted to know about was who was this woman who inspired P.L Travers to come up with the Mary Poppins character? In other words, what gave this writer/artist ( P.L Travers) her inspiration to come up with the character Mary Poppins? I am almost always curious to know what inspired artists. Furthermore, how did this figure save the Mr. Banks figure in her life, i.e. her father, and lastly.. exactly how cold was P.L Travers’ father? The trailer just looks so intriguing!! Anyway, if you are as intrigued as I am- then I encourage you to go see this movie!!