It’s Not Who You Know

I was discussing this matter with my Father over lunch one day.  He loves to quote a speaker at one commencement speech he attended saying, “It’s not who you know, but what who you know knows.”  Wow, say that 10 times fast!

I contest him on this topic every time he brings it up, and if you know anyone over the age of 50 you will know their repetitions are far from few.

His argument is that people who you know often know the same people you do, so they are not great resources for you and thus do not get your name ‘out there.’ Whatever this infinite abyss is.

I argue that those you know are more than likely to know an outside group you do not, and therefore will hope to introduce you to them.

As a college student the relationships with the people around us seem to determine a great deal about our present and future lives.  From your best friends to your boyfriends, or your ‘potential’ love lives for those of us out there still waiting to be paired up; every person you interact with determines something about your life.

So if my Dad’s philosophy on relationships is correct, then it seems as if in order to go far you must know a wide range of people.  This seems perfect in theory, but in practice it sounds terrifyingly daunting.  Maybe that’s the part I’m not understanding or blocking myself from understanding.

I am trying to facilitate relationships in the art field, specifically in the museum world, so that I will get letters of recommendations and hopefully secure a job after this magical world of college.

Maybe like many things in life, I should have a backup plan.  Who knows who I will run into or what opportunities may come my way.  In that case, maybe having a connection with many people in an array of fields will open more doors than simply knowing everyone at UMMA, in my case.

So maybe the goal is not who you know, but how many people you know and what can they offer you.  Choose wisely about the relationships you want to foster.  Make sure they better you as a human.

Keep all of your options open and I am sure those ‘right’ people will come your way.

Sara Studies Art History and Enjoys Long Walks

A Garden State of Mind

Cast of Jersey Shore- aka overgrown oompa loompas
"Cast" of Jersey Shore- aka overgrown oompa loompa's

Before I begin, I would like to preface this entry with the following: Yes, I am from New Jersey, and no, I have never encountered (for better or for worse) the “Situation.”

I guess my obsession with the MTV hit “Jersey Shore” was a long time coming. Everywhere I went people were talking about the “shore” and these self proclaimed “guidos” and “guidettes.” Even my friends (both from New Jersey and elsewhere) were completely hooked. “Is that what Jersey is like,” my friends from Michigan would ask, to which I would have to calmly respond, “No. It’s not.” For my friends back home, the intrigue of the show was the fact that it presented them with a new perspective of their home state. The places, roads, and landmarks that are shown throughout the show were the backdrops of some of our fondest memories. In fact, most of my friends spent the weekend after prom frolicking about in what has now been made infamous by MTV, Seaside Heights, New Jersey.

For those of who have read thus far and still don’t know what the hell “Jersey Shore” is let me quickly explain. “Jersey Shore” follows the lives of eight twenty- somethings living and partying together for one summer on the shore. Part “Real World” and part “The Hills” (except instead of Dior we have to settle for DEB) “Jersey Shore” is truly a whirlwind of fake tans, big boobs, and even bigger hair.

 The fakery, however, is not exclusive to the outward appearance of the “cast.” In fact, the entire notion that this show is an authentic portrayal of the Jerseyites (yes, I just made up a word!) is truly ludicrous. The truth is that only one of the eight cast members is actually from New Jersey, while most of the cast hails from New York (while one guy is from the great state of Rhode Island)- oh the joys of “reality” television!

Ultimately, “Jersey Shore” is truly just another caricature of the Garden State, founded upon stereotypes rather than reality (an albeit addictive and “so bad that it’s good” type of caricature!). My only hope is that you, the viewer, will be able to discern the truth from the reality. Trust me, New Jersey is more than theTurnpike, malls, and annoying accents. Take a chance and find out… I can give you first hand accounts if you’d like 🙂

Have a great MLK day/ FOUR-day week and be sure to leave your comments below!

The art of eating

I am a person who loves to eat food.  There are those who eat to live and who live to eat; clearly, I am the latter.  One of the foods I enjoy eating is sushi.  Those balls of delectable rice-y goodness, covered by clean slices of fresh, chewy raw fish, those rolls of seaweed wrapped rice melded with morsels of fish and vegetables– with the slightly stinging pickled gingers and nose-pinching wasabi laden soy sauce… It’s totally delicious.  No doubt about it.

Eating, I realized in Paris, is as much of an art as cooking is.  In all the cultures around the world, there is a certain kind of etiquette that is considered to be proper during meal times– in European societies, it is to begin with the outer utensils (in total of which there are like 10.. -___-), in America, it is to refrain from burping or picking noses at the table, etc.  Recently, I came upon a random website that taught the basics of eating sushi.  That was when I realized that… I HAD BEEN EATING SUSHI WRONGLY ALL MY LIFE!  Horror of horrors.

Okay, not that I care, really, because no matter how I eat it, it will always taste sooo goood and it all jumbles up in my stomach anyway.  But, it was a gain of new knowledge to me and reading about the different ways to “properly” eat sushi showed a lot of the logic and values of Japanese food culture.  In the case that anyone goes to Japan or a culturally Japanese restaurant in the future, here are some of the basic tips.

1. Do not rub the chopsticks together. I know, this is a hard one; we just really want to get all those little bitty splinters out– after all, who wants to be stabbed in the mouth while enjoying this deliciousness?  Yet, it does make sense that doing so would be a bit gauche: not only do we seem like OCD freaks, but also it could pose an insult to the owners, like their chopsticks are high quality enough (this is pure speculation).

2. Do not put wasabi into the soy sauce. Eeps– but how are we supposed to eat it, then?  In all of its mustard-y, spicy, salty soy sauce-y goodness?  Well, apparently, the thing is that sushi chefs have already placed dabs of wasabi under the fish, determining what he deems to be the correct proportion of wasabi.  However, if more kick is wanted, then we always have the choice to add more.

3. It is acceptable to eat nigiri (rice + fish) with hands. *gasp*  The only thing is, sashimi (raw fish slices) must always be eaten with chopsticks.

4. When eating nigiri, pick up the fish and dip it into the soy sauce, not the rice; otherwise, the rice will soak up too much soy sauce and overwhelm the flavor of the nigiri.

5. The pickeled ginger is meant to be a palate cleanser, eaten between bites or different types of sushi.  It should not be eaten together with the sushi.  Aw…sad.  I love the combination of the sour ginger with the slightly sweetness and saltiness of my sushi!

6. Eat nigiri sushi in one bite. It sounds hard, but nigiri should be easier to eat than rolls.  I don’t know what we’re supposed to do when we eat a giant spider roll the size of a baseball… Force it in?  It can be quite fun to do that, actually, and hold competitions with friends to see who can eat it all in one bite.  But I’m sure that that would not be considered “proper etiquette”.  Haha.

7. When handling food not our own, use the unused end of the chopsticks, not the end we put in our mouths, so as not to be unclean and rude.

Art doesn’t have to be limited to just the canvas or theatre stage.  It can be found everywhere.  It is the birth of an idea, the process of creation, and the result in creativity.  Even the way we eat our food in our daily lives is an art.  Each different method, each different utensil we choose to eat with, each decision to mix and match– all of these are personal, individual choices that affect the final outcome of the taste and experience of eating.  These processes are creative in itself, not to mention the final combinations of taste that are diverse and thus, very creative as well.

—–

Gabby Park is a triple concentrator in Communication Studies, French, and History of Art.  In her spare time, she looks up restaurant menus that make her hungry and consequently dream about eating all the great food in the world one day.

Symphony of Science

There are things that just seem to go together.  You know, the word packages like ‘bouncing baby boy’ or ‘fire engine red’.  They may be cliched, but they fit.  So do peanut butter and chocolate, Batman and Robin, and snow days and sledding.

There are however things that are so odd you can’t help but pause, back step, stare, and then be forced to move along. Or sometimes you just ignore them, such as seeing your professor shopping at Meijer. Or your friend’s boyfriend wearing a French maid costume.  There are the more mundane things too, like witnessing a guy baking or an athlete wearing a shirt proclaiming his love of the 80’s version of Transformers.  Some things just don’t fit.

And yet, they still get forced together.  Example A: CatDog.  

There is so much information, both personal and other that suggest these two creatures, hyperactive poochies and chillaxing kitties, just don’t belong together.  And yet in this cartoon they do.  Not perfectly mind you, but it is a meshing of opposites that works.

Another thing you don’t often see is a combination of art and science.

The two come from completely opposite ends of the spectrum.  Science is logical, structured.  It has to follow rules and procedures. Art? Not so much.  It is about emotions, free thinking, and a lack of restraints.  The two even use different parts our brains!

And yet there is a definite link between the two.  It has been shown that art programs in school results in better grades in the sciences and art is commonly used as a teaching tool.  Learning your ABCs would have been much harder without the song to accompany it. And would you really have reached your current reading level if there had been a lack of pictures to keep you entertained when you first got introduced to books?

Make way for the Frizz!

And don’t forget shows like the Magic School Bus!  I never would have been interested in science if not for Ms. Frizzle and the rest of the class.  Art was used to make science exciting, made children want to learn, and learn they did!  Who doesn’t remember the songs (or at least the choruses) of School House Rock?

But now that we’re older, art isn’t used as a teaching tool.  Well aside from those Screen Arts and Culture classes where you analyze culture concerns through movies. (All those vampire movies in the 80’s, fear of AIDS. Now? Wanting what is out of our reach.  Hey! Avatar was about that too!) Seriously, power point lectures are boring.  You’re lucky if you get to see an old sketch of some old dude.  And very few even do that.  Remember when you learned power point? The words effects and cool backgrounds was where it was at.

But maybe that’s not the case.  Maybe, somewhere out there in the vast network of computers and people that is called the [insert booming voice] The Internet [/voice] someone, somewhere had come with with another way to tech us through art.  I bring you, the Symphony of Science.

Wait no! Don’t run away with images of Yo-Yo Ma lecturing about sound vibration with a harp being plucked gently in the background in your head!  This is modern stuff completely lacking in violins, harps, trumpets, or conductors.  Instead consider John Boswell as a director.

Symphony of Science is an effort to deliver scientific knowledge in musical form.  There are four songs, each with downloads and lyrics available on the website as well as the music videos.  Each song is composed of the remixed quotes of scientists, from Carl Sagan, Jane Goodwell, and Bill Nye the Science Guy, put to the tune of electronic music.  And each explores different subjects: astronomy, evolution, humanity, creation.

They also get stuck in your head, just like the songs you hear on the radio.

But more than that, they actually teach.  Using images and phrases that wow you, make you pause and think.  And the best part is that each song is understandable.  There is no large amount of jargon to confuse you, only simple, eloquent thoughts that explain so much and also put you in your place.

But don’t just listen to me.  Listen to Boswell’s songs yourself.

Interested in more? Click here.

Your (recently converted) Carl Sagan junkie blogger,

Jenny

On rituals and writing

Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, at quarter before one in the stretch of early afternoon, I would push open the side-doors of the Union, a peppermint dissolving languidly on my tongue, and stop by Panera to fill my thermos with coffee in anticipation for two and a half hours of lecture.

Late every evening, at whatever obscene hour I decide it’s time to call it a night — to exalt my pillow in my dreams — I pull on my soft, black sweatpants, wash my face, pouch up the cushions into a more lively, dynamic and agreeable arrangement, and clamber into my bottom bunk with a book to fall asleep to.

And every day, before I sit down to begin a writing endeavor, a lunch-date, breakfast-date, midnight-rendezvous with words, if you will, I clear my desk, and turn on the relevant lighting appliances while I boil two cups of water to steep tea in the one, singular mug I own.

Rituals – mundane as they are, my life is guarded by them, as I assume yours is too to some degree. And this was what my fiction-writing professor inquired of his class. Searching into the small coterie of students, apprentices to his own craft, he posed the following queries. “Do you have a writing schedule? A particular fetish-object? Do you believe in the chisel or the muse?” And as the class, seated conveniently in a somewhat elliptical circle, proceeded to give in fine detail of the elaborate rituals they undertook in order for the words to surface and break into the realm of the consciousness, like swimmers gasping for air, I realized the eccentricity of the writer-personality. Twirling, tapping, and balancing pens and pencils, we all took turns to embrace the spotlight with some small tale of our lives. Some spoke of their joy of burning the midnight oil, driven by the ineffable comfort of the dark and the pin-point stars fastened to the sky; some, the pressing deadline chasing at their coattails. So far, nothing too shocking considering that we were, after all, a class of undergraduates; we were, on average, nocturnal. Others somewhat deviated from the “norm” a bit in either direction, with their best work penned on retractable airplane desks soaring 500 miles an hour over the steel blue Atlantic and thus, the mind and the corporeal body were equally engulfed in coils of wispy clouds. The rest of us, more earth-bound, alternatively would look up towards these tresses of blue sky for inspiration during the peak of the day, when the sun shone squarely on our pages, and while the wind could playfully nudge our curiosities. One classmate only used a typewriter for composition, to “feel the tactile sensation” of pressing a thought to paper, one discrete letter at a time. Meaning, would in effect, be knit together by these quick little physical displacements made by the synchrony of interphalangeal joints. Also suggested were stress balls. There were ski-masks. Apple jacks. Nothing was too bizarre or inconceivable for our group.

As I packed up my belongings and thoughts at the end of the class, I began to wonder at how some of the most renowned writers, those that were or would be commended generously generation after generation throughout the continuum of time, have organized their days and their habits around their passion for writing. I discovered, (to a slight dismay) that often, it was the other way around. Kafka who worked an office job during the day, allegedly started writing at 11 at night, and wrote “depending on my strength, inclination, and luck, until one, two, or three o’clock, once even till six in the morning.” Flaubert was “unable to work well on a full stomach, he ate lightly, or what passed for such in the Flaubert household, meaning that his first meal consisted of eggs, vegetables, cheese or fruit, and a cup of cold chocolate.” Toni Morrison found her frame of mind for ingenious, sharply brilliant composition through coffee and watching the sun’s rays break the air of the cold horizon. “I realized that I was clearer-headed, more confident and generally more intelligent in the morning.” Writing before dawn began as a necessity for Morrison, who found time only in the tiny hours of the morning before her children awoke, to lay down sentences from the fountain of her pen. Other fascinating rituals for writers (and artists) can be found here.

As for myself, I don’t think I’ve permanently fallen into one tradition or another that I must follow before I write. At least, nothing that extends beyond testing the buoyancy of a tea-bag (earl grey) in a mug adjacent to my notebook. Noon, midnight… my habits are eclectic and uncertain as I stand on the threshold of adulthood. More or less for now, I adopt Eliot’s approach to writing. “The poet’s mind is a receptacle for seizing and storing up numberless feelings, phrases, images, which remain there until the particles which can unite to form a new compound are present together.” Whenever the right moment arrives, when that tremendous electrical storm shatters the attic upstairs after days of deliberate observation, you’ll find me furiously, ecstatically scrawling on any portable surface, never mind if it’s the backside of a half-destroyed menu or one of those programs they hand out before a concert or play. Some days, when the receptacle is empty, I try to schedule time to write and I stand convinced that the tea helps.

Now, I turn the inquiry over to you: What are some of your own idiosyncratic writing rituals, if any?

Sue majors in Neuroscience & English and tends to lurk in bookstores.

Art and Economic Climate

I am sure a lot of us out there in the arts profession are groveling about our future plans after this liminal space we like to call college.  As funding for the arts continues to decrease, so do positions in our desired fields.

While this economic crisis is new to our generation, it is familiar to older generations who have battled with budgets and recessions on various occasions.  Reflecting and delving into the stories of art related professions provide insight for the next emerging class into how we are going to take on this economic climate, and win.

The theme for this week’s blog stemmed from a visit to my past employer, SPACES Gallery, over Winter break.  SPACES is a contemporary art gallery in downtown Cleveland, Ohio.  Yes, I know boo Ohio!  Well before you start the diss the state we love to hate, listen first to a message of one of SPACES’ exhibits titled Art Work.

I entered the gallery and was impressed by the audio and visual additions to the exhibits.  I wandered from wall to wall attempting to soak in all the information the gallery exhibits were striving to illuminate.  I sat and watched a video about nature for a few moments, but even with the visual aid, my attention span was short and I found myself wandering again.

After fifteen minutes or so of gallivanting around the corners wondering what would surprise me next, I finally came across my subject for today’s discussion.  It didn’t literally speak to me like the other audio videos or try to entertain me like some of the other exhibits; it was simply a compilation of 40 pages of newspaper articles adhered to the wall, waiting to be read.  Seeing two large walls lined with articles was daunting, but I was intrigued by what the words had to say so I started reading, one by one.

For those of you out there who don’t ‘understand’ art, I am strongly convinced you will understand this exhibit’s message.  For instead of looking and interpreting your own opinion for this work of art, this display of words literally provides one for you.  All you need to do is take the time to read!

Below the heading, Art Work, follows the bi-line, “A National Conversation About ART, LABOR, and ECONOMICS.”

Captivating.

The articles consist of personal statements, historical knowledge discussing events as far back as the 1930’s up until the present.  If you read through the entire exhibit you begin to understand art movements dating as far back as the 1930’s in relation to the economic climate.  Another interesting aspect I found helpful was delving into what the exhibit titles, “Personal Economy,” which outlines anonymous personal accounts of creative arts people telling their story of working in the art profession.  Its always nice to see how people similar to you have made a living.  It reminds you it’s possible and that you are truly not crazy.

To read more about the exhibit and SPACES click:here

Have a good week!

Sara

Sara majors in Art History and enjoys long walks